3. The Graphic Communication Actor: Generating Visual Rhetoric for Development Initiatives
References
- 1. Anonymous, (2007), Introductory Models and Basic Concepts: Lasswell. The Lasswell Formula.http://www.google. Retrieved: 1/24/2007.
- 2. Blair, M.G., Jones, S.R. & Simpson, H.R. (1975), Educational Psychology. Macmillan Publishing Co; Inc. New York, U.S.A.
- 3. Bowers, J. (1973), Action Research and The Production of Communication Media, In R. Varma, S.L. Ghosal, J. Bowers, and R.H. Hull (eds), Action Research and The Production of Communication Media. Report on the All
- 4. Field Workshop on Action Research in Agricultural Information Communication, Udaipur, 10-20 September, 1973. Typographic Unit, University of Reading, England.
- 5. David, L. (2015). “Paradigms in Learning Theories. https://www.learningtheories.com/paradigms. Retrieved: 6/3/2019.
- 6. Ebigbagha, (2016). Graphic Encoding Choices in Development Communication: Identifying the Several Loops of the Graphic Encoder/Media Team Collaboration. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing - Ominiscriptum, Gmb & Co. KG Germany.
- 7. Ebigbagha, S.Z. (2016b). Graphic Communication for Sustainable Development: Eliciting Desired Response from Target Audience. In Ebohon, O.J., Ayeni, D.A., Egbu, C.O., and Omole, F.K, Process of the Joint International Conference (JIC) on 21st Century Human Habitat: Issues, Sustainability and Development, 21-24 March 2016, Akure, Nigeria Pp. 1045-1052.
- 8. Ebigbagha, (2019). The Laswell Formula: Implications for Graphic Communication in Development Initiatives. Journal of Ceramics and Environmental Design. Vol. 6, No.2, p. 215-232.
- 9. Ejembi, E.A. (1989), Graphic Communication in Development Programmes: Models for Communicators. An Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Typography and Graphic Communication, University of Reading, England.
- 10. Lidwell, W. Holden, K. & Butler, J. (2013). Universal Principles of Design. Rockport. Beverly, Massachusetts, USA.
- 11. Machado, M. (2002), Information Processing and Other Hierarchy of Effects Theories. 382J: theories of Persuasive communication and Consumer Decision Making. University of Texas at Austin, Fall 2002. corbis.com.http://www.google.ie Retrieved: 1/24/2007.
- 12. McGuire, W.J. (1989), Theoretical Foundations of Campaigns. In Rice, R.E.; and Atkin, C.K. (ed.), Public Communication Campaigns; Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California, U.S.A.
- 13. McGuire, W.J. (1999), Constructing Social Psychology: Creative and Critical Processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.10.1017/CBO9780511571206
- 14. Myers, D.G. (2002), Social Psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York, U.S.A. Scholten, M. (1996), Lost and Found: the Information-Processing Model of Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Business Research, 37, p. 97-104.
- 15. Society for Family Health, (2006), Corporate Presentation. Society for Family Health, Abuja, Nigeria.
- 16. Watt, J.H. (1979), Television Form, Content Attributes, and Viewer Behaviour. In Voigt, J.M., and Hanneman, J.G. (ed.), Progress in Communication Sciences, Volume I, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey, U.S.A. World Health Organisation (1987), Communication – A Guide for managers of National Diarrhoeal Disease Control Programmes. World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
- 17. Wright, P. (1981), Problems to be Solved when Creating Usable Documents, MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, England.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rae-2020-0031 | Journal eISSN: 2501-238X
Language: English
Page range: 262 - 279
Published on: May 8, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2020 Sylvester Zifegha Ebigbagha, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.