Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Anatomy of Place-Making in the Context of the Communication Processes: A Story of one Community and one Square in a Post-Socialist City Cover

Anatomy of Place-Making in the Context of the Communication Processes: A Story of one Community and one Square in a Post-Socialist City

Open Access
|May 2019

References

  1. Adams P.C., 2005. The boundless self. Communication in physical and virtual spaces. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse.
  2. Adams P.C., 2009. Geographies of media and communication: A critical introduction. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
  3. Adams P.C., 2017. Geographies of media and communication I: Metaphysics of encounter. Progress in Human Geography 41(3): 365–374.
  4. Andrusz G., Harloe M., Szelenyi I. (eds), 1996. Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
  5. Anguelovski I., 2013. From environmental trauma to safe haven: Place attachment and place remaking in three marginalized neighborhoods of Barcelona, Boston, and Havana. City and Community 12(3): 211–237.
  6. Block P., 2009. Community: The structure of belonging. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Oakland.
  7. Clark J., Kearns A., Cleland C., 2016. Spatial scale, time and process in mega-events: The complexity of host community perspectives on neighbourhood change. Cities 53: 87–97.
  8. Davies N., 1981. God’s playground. A history of Poland. 1795 to the present. Vol. 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  9. Dear M., 1992. What kind of social communication accompany place-making processes from citizens point of view? Journal of the American Planning Association 58(3): 288–300.
  10. Devine-Wright P., 2015. Renewable energy and the public: From NIMBY to participation. Routledge, New York, London.
  11. Downs A., 1981. Neighborhood and Urban Development. Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.
  12. Forrest R., 2000. Does neighbourhood still matter in a globalised world? Occasional Paper Series No. 5, Centre for Comparative Public Management and Social Policy. University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong City.
  13. Friedmann J., 2010. Place and place-making in cities: A global perspective. Planning Theory & Practice 11(2): 149–165.
  14. Galster G., 2001. On the nature of neighbourhood. Urban Studies 38(12): 2111–2124.
  15. Glikman A., Semyonov M., 2012. Ethnic origin and residential attainment of immigrants in European countries. City and Community 11(2): 198–219.
  16. Grant J., Mittelsteadt L., 2004. Types of gated communities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31(6): 913–930.
  17. Gu Hongyan, 2016. NIMBYism in China: Issues and prospects of public participation in facility siting. Land Use Policy 52: 527–534.
  18. Hanhörster H., Weck S., 2016. Cross-local ties to migrant neighborhoods: The resource transfers of out-migrating Turkish middle-class households. Cities 59: 193–199.
  19. Hidalgo C.M., Hernández B., 2001. Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(3): 273–281.
  20. Hirt S., Ferenčuhová S., Tuvikene T., 2016. Conceptual forum: The “post-socialist” city. Eurasian Geography and Economics 57(4–5): 497–520.
  21. Jacobs J., 1992. The death and life of great American cities. Vintage Books, New York.
  22. Jansson A., Falkheimer J. (eds), 2006. Geographies of communication. The spatial turn in media studies. Nordicom, Göteborg.
  23. King C.S., Feltey K.M., Susel B.O., 1998. The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review 58(4): 317–326.
  24. Kotus J., 2006. Changes in the spatial structure of a large Polish city - The case of Poznań. Cities 23(5): 364–381.
  25. Koziołek K., 2013. Poznań: Plac Asnyka odzyska secesyjny charakter. http://Poznań.naszemiasto.pl/artykul/Poznań-plac-asnyka-odzyska-secesyjny-charakter,1706881,art,t,id,tm.html (accessed: January 2013).
  26. Larsen S.C., Johnson J.T., 2016. The agency of place: Toward a more-than-human geographical self. GeoHumanities 2(1): 149–166.
  27. Lepofsky J., Fraser J., 2003. Building community citizens: Claiming the right to place-making in the city. Urban Studies 40(1): 127–142.
  28. Lewicka M., 2010. What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(1): 35–51.
  29. Low S., 2004. Behind the gates. Life, security and the pursuit of happiness in Fortress America. Routledge, New York, London.
  30. Martin D.G., 2003. “Place-framing” as place-making: Constituting a neighbourhood for organizing and activism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(3): 730–750.
  31. Mazur N., 2014. Plac Asnyka – dar od bambrów z Jeżyc. http://Poznań.wyborcza.pl/Poznań/1,36001,15412260,Plac_Asnyka___dar_od_bambrow_z_Jezyc.html (accessed: January 2018).
  32. McClymont K., 2011. Revitalising the political: Development control and agonism in planning practice. Planning Theory 10(3): 238–256.
  33. Middleton A., Murie A., Groves R., 2005. Social capital and neighbourhoods that work. Urban Studies 42(10): 1711– 1738.
  34. Miessen M., 2011. The nightmare of participation (crossbench praxis as a mode of criticality). Sternberg Press, Berlin.
  35. Miller J.G., Das R., Chakravarthy S., 2011. Culture and the role of choice in agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023330
  36. Moote M.A., McClaran M.P., Chickering D.K., 1997. Theory in practice: Applying participatory democracy theory to public land planning. Environmental Management, 21, 6: 877–889.
  37. Oakes T.S., Price P.L., 2008. The Cultural Geography Reader. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
  38. Owens A., 2012. Neighborhoods on the rise: A typology of neighborhoods experiencing socioeconomic ascent. City and Community 11, 4: 345–369.
  39. Patterson M., 2016. The global city versus the city of neighborhoods: Spatial practice, cognitive maps, and the aesthetics of urban conflict. City and Community 15, 2: 163– 183.
  40. Pløger J., 2004. Strife: Urban planning and agonism. Planning Theory 3, 1: 71–92.
  41. Reed M.S., 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141(10): 2417–2431.
  42. Rose-Ackerman S., 2001. Trust and honesty in post-socialist societies. Kyklos, 54, 2–3: 415–443.
  43. Saint M.P., Flavell R.J., Fox P.F., 2009. NIMBY wars. The politics of land use. Philadelphia: Saint University.
  44. Schirato T., Yell S., 2000. Communication and culture: An introduction. Sage Publications
  45. Sevilla-Buitrago A., 2013. Debating contemporary urban conflicts: A survey of selected scholars. Cities 31: 454–468.
  46. Sprawozdanie z audytu 2014. Audyt inwestycji pn. Rewitalizacja Placu Adama Asnyka. https://www.facebook.com/placdlaludzi/ enter November 2014
  47. Tsenkova S., Nedović-Budić Z., 2006. The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe. Contributions to Economics Series: Springer.
  48. Walljasper J., 2007. The great neighbourhood book. A do-it-your-self guide to placemaking. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
  49. Wiliams J.J., 2000. South Africa: Urban transformation. Cities 17(3): 167–183.
  50. Wu Z., Hou F., Schimmele C.M., 2011. Racial diversity and sense of belonging in urban neighborhoods. City & Community 10(4): 373–392.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2019-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 66
Submitted on: Jan 19, 2019
Published on: May 13, 2019
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2019 Jacek Kotus, Tomasz Sowada, Michał Rzeszewski, Patrycja Mańkowska, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.