Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessing Households’ Gas and Electricity Consumption: A Case Study of Djelfa, Algeria Cover

Assessing Households’ Gas and Electricity Consumption: A Case Study of Djelfa, Algeria

Open Access
|Dec 2018

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Climate zone in the department of Djelfa. Based on DTR 3.2: 2004.

Fig. 2

Temperature variation between 1930 and 2004.

Table 1

Mean values, standard deviation and test of normality of the variables.

With log10 transformation
Variables (2013)MeanStd deviationSkewnessKurtosisSkewnessKurtosis
gas subscribers3126.867523.274.3521.320.800.13
gas consumption (Kth)80545.56210208.394.8425.860.720.11
electricity subscribers3968.758209.254.1319.380.740.56
electricity consumption (mwh)10139.7521255.034.1819.660.510.56
number of population35667.1464194.614.5122.920.321.77
number of housing6256.299888.584.0318.070.910.59
Fig. 3

Consumption of (a) electricity and (b) gas by residential buildings in 2013.

Fig. 4

Gas and electricity consumption in 2008 per municipality.

Fig. 5

(a) housing number and size, (b) household size, room occupancy and average number of rooms per housing, (c) appliance ownership (TV, cooker, washing machine, refrigerator and air conditioner).

Table 2

Summary of the gas and electricity model.

Electricity model summary (R2=0.937)Gas model summary (R2= 0.986)
modelunstandardised coefficientsstandardised coefficientsSig.modelunstandardised coefficientsstandardised coefficientsSig.
BStd. errorBetaBStd. errorBeta
(constant)0.9270.2680.002(constant)1.635.163.000
log10_electricity subscribers1.2390.0971.1780.000log10_gas_subscribers1.141.0501.097.000
log10_number_of housings−0.3720.145−0.2380.015log10_population number−.161.065−.120.020
Table 3

Normality tests of the models.

Validation test
Electricity modelGas model
SkewnessKurtosisKolmogorov-Smirnova (KS)Shapiro-WilkSkewnessKurtosisKolmogorov-SmirnovaShapiro-Wilk
.745.426.200*.092*−.334−.718.200*.570*

* Both tests, Kolmogorov-Smirnova and Shapiro-Wilk have a p-value greater than 0.05 which indicates normal distribution (Ghasemi, Zahediasl 2012; Öztuna et al. 2006).

Fig. 6

PCA of all the variables used to cluster municipalities according to their population characteristics, dwelling typology, population distribution, climate zone, and appliance ownership.

Legend: A_Z = arid zone, SA_Z= semi-arid zone H_S = household size, R_O = room occupancy, M_A = mean area, HQ_M = population number living in headquarter municipality, S_Z = population number living in scattered zone, S_A = population living in secondary agglomeration, DT = density, CD = collective dwelling, IVD = individual dwelling, TD = traditional dwelling, G_C = gas consumption per municipality, E_C = electricity consumption per municipality, G_H = gas consumption per housing, E_H = electricity consumption per housing, E_L = education level, App = appliance ownership, AA = average age per housing per municipality.

Table 4

Characteristics of clusters.

Cluster1234
Label
Housing energy consumption++
Municipality energy consumption++
Size3 (8.3 %)26 (72.2%)1 (2.8 %)6 (16.7 %)
Variablesclimate zonesemi-aridsemi-aridsemi-aridarid
population distributiondensityaverage densitylow densitydenselow density
municipality centremoderately populatedthinly populatedhighly populatedthinly populated
secondary agglomerationmoderately populatedthinly populatedthinly populatedthinly populated
scattered zonemoderately populatedmoderately populatedmoderately populatedhighly populated
population characteristicsaverage agehighest ratemoderate ratelowest ratelowest rate
education levelhighest ratelow ratemoderate ratelow rate
dwelling occupancymean areamoderatehighmoderateless
room occupancymoderatemoderatehighest ratelowest rate
household sizelow ratemoderate ratelowest ratehighest rate
dwelling typologycollective dwellinghigh ratelow ratehighest ratelowest rate
individual dwellinghigh ratelow ratehighest ratelow rate
traditional dwellinghigh ratemoderate ratehigh ratemoderate
appliance ownershiphighest ratemoderate ratemoderate ratelowest rate
Fig. 7

Projection of municipalities according to PCA.

Table 5

Bivariate correlations between energy consumption and households, housing variables, density and appliance ownership.

A-AELLog10HRP>60M_AH-SR-OLog10DtLog10 (A-C)CTVRefrWMApp
EUICorrelation.594**.521**.514**−.593**−.781**−.321.335*.280.348*.490**.358*.253.431**
Sig..000.001.001.000.000.057.046.099.038.002.032.137.009
GCorrelation.590**.551**.564**−.543**−.747**−.330*.395*.287.390*
Sig..000.000.000.001.000.049.017.089.019
ECorrelation.362*.018−.166−.782**−.746**−.089−.356*.086.078.044−.234.006
Sig..030.916.332.000.000.604.033.616.653.800.170.973

* − Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

** − Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

With, EUI: energy use index per capita (kwh/m2.y), G: household gas consumption per capita (kwh/m2.y), E: household electricity consumption per capita (kwh/m2.y), AA: average age, El: education level, Log10HRP>60 : log10 household with responsible person older than 60, M_A: mean area (m2), HS: household size, RO: room occupancy, Log10Dt: log10 density, Log10(A–C): log10 air conditioner, C: cooker ownership, TV: TV ownership, Refr.: refrigerator ownership, WM: washing machine ownership, App: mean appliance ownership.

Table 6

Model fit Indices of per-capita gas consumption.

dfχ2Probability levelRMSEANFICFI
gas model88.9080.350.0570.9640.996
Fig. 8

Path analysis containing all possible hypotheses.

Fig. 9

Standardised direct effect for gas consumption per kwh/person.m2.y.

Table 7

Path analysis: standardised direct effect.

EstimateStandard ErrP
housing areahouseholds size1.047***
housing arearoom occupancy−.745***
log 10 densityHRP>60.805***
gas_kwhm2_plog 10 density.257.021**
gas_kwhm2_peducation level.239.032**
gas_kwhm2_phousing area−.234.052*
gas_kwhm2_phouseholds size−.493***

*** significant at 0.001 level

** significant at 0.05 level

* significant at 0.06 level

Table 8

Direct, indirect and total effect of household, housing and density variables on per-capita gas consumption.

HRP>60Room OccupancyHouseholds sizeEducation LevelHousing areaLog 10 Density
effectDirIndtotDirIndtotDirIndtotDirIndtotDirIndtotDirIndtot
M_A.000.000.000−.745.000−.7451.047.0001.047.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000
density.805.000.805.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000
gas*.000.207.207.000.174.174−.493−.245−.738.239.000.239−.234.000−.234.257.000.257

* Gas: per-capita gas consumption (kwh/m2.y.capita).

Fig. 10

Direct and indirect effect of variables on household gas consumption. With: H_S: household size, E_L: education level, R_O: room occupancy, HRP>60: household with a responsible person over the age of 60, DT: density, H_A: housing area.

Table 9

Electricity Model fit Indices.

dfχ2Probability levelRMSEANFICFI
Electricity model116.3520.8490.0570.9801.000
Fig. 11

Direct impact of variables on per-capita electricity consumption.

Table 10

Path analysis: significance of direct impact.

EstimateP
log 10 densityHRP>60.805***
appliancelog density.275.008**
applianceroom occupancy−.163.014**
applianceeducation local1.070***
applianceHRP>60−.480***
housing arearoom occupancy−.745***
housing areahousehold size1.047***
E_kwhm2_phousing area−.829***
E_kwhm2_plog density−.430***
E_kwhm2_pappliance.194.071*
E_kwhm2_proom occupancy−.395***

*** significant at 0.001 level

** significant at 0.05 level

* significant at 0.08 level

Table 11

Direct, indirect and total impact of variables on per-capita electricity consumption. Effect Household size Education level Room occupancy HRP>60 Log 10 density Appliance Housing area

EffectHousehold sizeEducation levelRoom occupancyHRP>60Log 10 densityApplianceHousing area
DirindirtotDirindirtotDirindirtotDirindirtotDirindirtotDirindirtotDirindirtot
density.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.805.000.805.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000
App.000.000.0001.070.0001.070−.163.000−.163−.480.222−.259.275.000.275.000.000.000.000.000.000
M_A1.047.0001.047.000.000.000−.745.000−.745.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000
Elec*.000−.868−.868.000.207.207−.395.586.192.000−.396−.396−.430.053−.376.194.000.194−.829.000−.829

* Elec: per-capita electricity consumption (kwh/m2.y.capita).

Fig. 12

Direct and indirect effect of variables on household electricity consumption. With: H_S: household size, E_L: education level, R_O: room occupancy, HRP>60: household with a responsible person over the age of 60, DT: density, App: appliance ownership, H_A: housing area.

Fig. 13

Direct and indirect effect of variables on gas and electricity household consumption. With: H_S: household size, E_L: education level, R_O: room occupancy, HRP>60: household with a responsible person over the age of 60, DT: density, App: appliance ownership, H_A: housing area.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0034 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103 (formerly 0137-477X)
Language: English
Page range: 111 - 129
Submitted on: Mar 25, 2018
Published on: Dec 31, 2018
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2018 Soufiane Boukarta, Ewa Berezowska-Azzag, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.