Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Selected Modern Methods and Tools for Public Participation in Urban Planning – A Review

Quaestiones Geographicae
Volume 37 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)
By:
Open Access
|Sep 2018

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Public participation support system by Kahila-Tani (2016).
Public participation support system by Kahila-Tani (2016).

Fig. 2

M. Haklay’s interpretation of Freenberg’s (1999) opinion on technology.
M. Haklay’s interpretation of Freenberg’s (1999) opinion on technology.

Fig. 3

Workflow for the GeoCitizen Platform (by Fundación CEC and Z-GIS Salzburg).
Workflow for the GeoCitizen Platform (by Fundación CEC and Z-GIS Salzburg).

Fig. 4

Organisational design of the GeoCitizen Platform (by T. Blaschke and K. Atzmanstorfer).
Organisational design of the GeoCitizen Platform (by T. Blaschke and K. Atzmanstorfer).

Fig. 5

Comments on draft plan of land use of the Rokietnica centre (by D. Walczak and M. Młodkowski).
Comments on draft plan of land use of the Rokietnica centre (by D. Walczak and M. Młodkowski).

Fig. 6

P. Nijkmap’s view on a smart, interactive navigation tool based on a balanced trade-off of Society, Environment and Economy.
P. Nijkmap’s view on a smart, interactive navigation tool based on a balanced trade-off of Society, Environment and Economy.

Fig. 7

Age distribution of respondents in Olomouc (by J. Pánek).
Age distribution of respondents in Olomouc (by J. Pánek).

Fig. 8

Age and gender structure of respondents in geo-questionnaire on Tumska Street in Płock (by B. Kietlińska et al.).
Age and gender structure of respondents in geo-questionnaire on Tumska Street in Płock (by B. Kietlińska et al.).

Fig. 9

Methodological framework of Geodesign for Pampulha in Brazil. The whole case study was developed in three iterations of Geodesign method (by A.C. Moura et al.).
Methodological framework of Geodesign for Pampulha in Brazil. The whole case study was developed in three iterations of Geodesign method (by A.C. Moura et al.).

Fig. 10

The composition of three Geodesign iterations in the case study of Pampulha. Each iteration involves working with representation, process, and evaluation models resulting in the production of data, information, and knowledge, respectively. Following the account of the existing conditions, the proposal stage begins, which is related to change, impact and decision models that also produce data, information and knowledge, respectively (by A.C. Moura et al.).
The composition of three Geodesign iterations in the case study of Pampulha. Each iteration involves working with representation, process, and evaluation models resulting in the production of data, information, and knowledge, respectively. Following the account of the existing conditions, the proposal stage begins, which is related to change, impact and decision models that also produce data, information and knowledge, respectively (by A.C. Moura et al.).

Fig. 11

Screenshot of Web-based application FirstLife (firstlife.org).
Screenshot of Web-based application FirstLife (firstlife.org).

Fig. 12

Public participation in urban planning in Poland and Web-based applications of geo-questionnaire and geo-discussion (by E. Bąkowska et al.).
Public participation in urban planning in Poland and Web-based applications of geo-questionnaire and geo-discussion (by E. Bąkowska et al.).

Fig. 13

Structured process of decision-making in urban planning (by E. Bąkowska et al.).
Structured process of decision-making in urban planning (by E. Bąkowska et al.).

Fig. 14

Some results of geo-questionnaire and their influence on the formation of draft land use plan (by E. Bąkowska et al.).
Some results of geo-questionnaire and their influence on the formation of draft land use plan (by E. Bąkowska et al.).

Fig. 15

Framework for an integrated approach to public participation in urban planning (by M. Czepkiewicz et al.).
Framework for an integrated approach to public participation in urban planning (by M. Czepkiewicz et al.).

The complementary case study approach involves three case studies in Dublin, Nottingham, and London (by A_ Corcoran and Z_ Nedovic-Budic)_

Case study elementsResearch stepCommon methodologyAnalysis method
Stakeholder group
Resilience principlePre-design data collectionFocus groupsContent analyses
Resilience issuePre-design data collectionFocus groupsContent analyses
G-ICT (geographical information and communication technology)Pre-design data collectionFocus groupsContent analyses
Prototyping developmentProgramming
ImplementationRecruitment of prototype users/gathering of content
EvaluationControlled experimentStatistical analysis
Focus GroupsContent analyses
SurveyStatistical analysis

Proposed dimensions of PPGIS design (by M_ Czepkiewicz et al_)_

Socio-institutional context of participation processParticipants Who is participating?Technology Design considerations for PPGIS GIS tools
Rules and normsPlanning approachSituation in the planning processObjectivesConveners and recipientsSubjectResourcesSystem of tools and communication channelsKnowledge available to participantsSelection criteriaGroup sizeRecruitmentDirection of communicationType of interactions between participantsTypes of contributionsInput formatGeographic information aids
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0030 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 127 - 149
Submitted on: Aug 17, 2017
Published on: Sep 6, 2018
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Geoweb methods,
public participation,
urban planning,
GIScience,
citizen science
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geography

© 2018 Muki Haklay, Piotr Jankowski, Zbigniew Zwoliński, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 37 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)Next article