Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Number of respondents in Srigading and Gadingsari based on capacity level and distance between houses and shoreline_
| Capacity levels | Distance between Houses and Shoreline | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Srigading | Gadingsari | |||||||||
| Near | Moderate | Far | Total | % | Near | Moderate | Far | Total | % | |
| Low | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 11.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 4 | 10 | 9 | 23 | 63.89 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 | 65 |
| High | 6 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 25.00 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 35 |
The classification of capacity levels_
| Classes | Total scores | Descriptions |
|---|---|---|
| Low | 6–13 | Lack of capacity to implement disaster risk reduction |
| Medium | 14–22 | Adequate capacity to implement disaster risk reduction |
| High | 23–30 | High capacity to implement disaster risk reduction |
The extent of susceptible area to coastal erosion based on land use_
| Land use | Vulnerability classes | Area (ha) |
|---|---|---|
| Beach sands | Medium | 12.08 |
| Beach sands | Medium | 13.39 |
| Beach sands | Medium | 16.40 |
| Beach sands | High | 23.07 |
| Beach sands | High | 6.07 |
| Beach sands | High | 43.14 |
| Settlement | High | 6.09 |
| Grass | High | 2.14 |
| Irrigated rice field | Medium | 4.46 |
| Irrigated rice field | High | 27.06 |
| Irrigated rice field | High | 6.43 |
| Dry land | Medium | 2.25 |
| Dry land | Medium | 1.91 |
| Dry land | High | 0.30 |
| Dry land | High | 3.64 |
| Water body | High | 22.71 |
| Water body | High | 9.51 |
Research variables_
| Objectives | Factors | Variables | Descriptions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vulnerability | Physical | Number of houses | The higher, the more vulnerable |
| Distance to shoreline | The closer to shoreline, the more vulnerable | ||
| House types | Non-permanent house is more vulnerable than the permanent one | ||
| Social | Population size | The higher, the more vulnerable | |
| Sex | Women are more vulnerable than men | ||
| Age | Elderly and children cause more vulnerability | ||
| Education | The higher, the less vulnerable | ||
| Number of disabled people | The higher, the more vulnerable | ||
| Economic | Job | People with professional jobs are less vulnerable | |
| Unemployment | The higher, the more vulnerable | ||
| Number of poor household | The higher, the more vulnerable | ||
| Economic facilities | The higher, the more vulnerable | ||
| Community capacity | Knowledge of abrasion | Abrasion | The more the knowledge, the less vulnerable |
| The cause of abrasion | The more the knowledge, the less vulnerable | ||
| The impact of abrasion | The more the knowledge, the less vulnerable | ||
| The countermeasures of abrasion | The more the knowledge, the less vulnerable | ||
| Abrasion risk reduction measures | The more the knowledge, the less vulnerable |
Contingency coefficients_
| Symmetric Measuresc | Value | Approx. Sig. | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nominal by Nominal | Phi | 0.335 | 0.180 |
| Cramer’s V | 0.237 | 0.180 | |
| Contingency coefficient | 0.317 | 0.180 | |
| N of valid cases | 56 | ||
j_quageo-2018-0029_tab_006_w2aab3b7b8b1b6b1ab1b1b4b3Aa
| Gadingsari Village: |
| 395 / 1,108 × 56 = 20 households, |
| Srigading Village: |
| 713 / 1,108 × 56 = 36 households, |
| Total = 56 households. |