Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Variations in the Spatial Distribution of Areas of Economic Growth and Stagnation in Poland: Determinants and Consequences Cover

Variations in the Spatial Distribution of Areas of Economic Growth and Stagnation in Poland: Determinants and Consequences

By: Paweł Churski  
Open Access
|Jun 2014

References

  1. Aumayr Ch.M., 2007. European region types in EU-25. The European Journal of Comparative Economics 4(2): 109-147.
  2. Chojnicki Z., Czyż T. (eds), 1991. Zróżnicowanie przestrzenne poziomu i warunków życia ludności (Spatial differences in the population’s level and conditions of living). Biuletyn KPZK PAN 153, Warszawa.
  3. Churski P., 2012. Zróżnicowanie przestrzenne obszarów wzrostu i obszarów stagnacji gospodarczej w Polsce - wyzwania dla polskiej polityki spójności po 2013 r. (Spatial differences in areas of economic growth and stagnation in Poland: Challenges for the post-2013 Polish cohesion policy). In: Ciok S., Raczyk A. (eds), Wyzwania polityki regionalnej i lokalnej. Rozprawy Naukowe IGiRR UWr 27, Wrocław. Cohesion Policy Support for Local Development. Best Practice and Future Policy Options. Final Report. Brussels, April 2010.
  4. Dymnicki A.B., Henry D.B., 2011. Use of clustering methods to understand more about the case. Methodological Innovations Online 6(2), 6-26. http:// www.pbs.plym.ac.uk/mi/pdf/31-08-11/2.%20Dymnicki%20-%20pp6-26.pdf 10.4256/mio.2010.0033
  5. Faludi A., 2006. From European spatial development to territorial cohesion policy. Regional Studies 40(6): 667-678. 10.1080/00343400600868937
  6. Fifth Report of Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Investing in Europe’s future. 2010. European Union Commission, Regional Policy, Luxembourg. Identyfikacja i delimitacja obszarów problemowych i strategicznej interwencji w Polsce. Wnioski z analiz (Identification and delimitation of problem areas and strategic intervention areas in Poland. Conclusions from analyses). 2009.
  7. Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego, Instytut Badań Strukturalnych, Warszawa. Janc K., 2006. Zjawisko autokorelacji przestrzennej na przykładzie statystyki I Morana oraz lokalnych wskaźników zależności przestrzennej (LISA) - wybrane zagadnienia metodyczne (Spatial autocorrelation as exemplified by Moran’s I statistic and local indicators of spatial association (LISA)). In: Komornicki T., Podgórski Z. (eds), Idee i praktyczny uniwersalizm geografii. Dokumentacja Geograficzna 33, IGiPZ, Warszawa: 76-83.
  8. Kostrubiec B., 1965. Klasyfikacja dynamiczna i wielocechowa województw Polski (Dynamic and multivariate classification of Poland’s voivodeships). Biuletyn KPZK PAN 35, Warszawa: 28-49.
  9. Kronhalter F., 2003. A study of the competitiveness of regions based on cluster analysis: The example of East Germany. Halle Institute for Economic Research. Halle/Saale.
  10. Krugman P., 1995. Development, geography, and economic theory (Ohlin Lectures). MIT Press, Cambridge, London.10.7551/mitpress/2389.001.0001
  11. Martin R., Sunley P., 2011. The new economic geography and policy relevance. Journal of Economic Geography 11(2): 357-369.10.1093/jeg/lbq042
  12. Meijers E.J, Waterhout B., Zonneveld W.A.M., 2007. Closing the gap: Territorial cohesion through polycentric development. European Journal of Spatial Development 24: 1-24.
  13. Molle W., 2007. European cohesion policy. Routledge, London.10.4324/9780203945278
  14. Morrison D.F., 1990. Multivariate statistical analysis. McGraw- Hill, New York (3rd ed.).
  15. Palme G., 1995a. Divergenz regionaler Konvergenzclubs. WIFO Monatsberichte 12(95): 769-781.
  16. Palme G., 1995b. Struktur und Entwicklung österreichischer Wirtschaftsregionen. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft 137: 393-416.
  17. Pakiet legislacyjny 2014-2020 (The 2014-2020 legislation package). http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/what/future/proposals_2014_2020_pl.cfm.
  18. Regional development policies in OECD countries, 2010. OECD Report, Paris.
  19. Reshaping economic geography, 2009. World Development Report, World Bank, Washington.
  20. Regional policy contributing to sustainable growth in Europe 2020, 2011. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. European Commission, SEC (2011) 92 final, Brussels.
  21. Shrinking regions: A paradigm shift in demography and territorial development, 2008. Study - Regional Development, Policy Department B, Structural and Cohesion Policies, European Parliament, PE 408.928., Brussels.
  22. Smith D., 1972. Geography and social indicators. South African Geographical Journal 54: 43-57.10.1080/03736245.1972.10559497
  23. Szymla Z., 2000. Determinanty rozwoju regionalnego (Determinants of regional development). Ossolineum, Wrocław.
  24. Tryon R.C., 1939. Cluster analysis. Edwards Bros., Ann Arbor, MI.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2014-0016 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103
Language: English
Page range: 63 - 77
Submitted on: Oct 4, 2013
Published on: Jun 17, 2014
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2014 Paweł Churski, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.