Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Controlled Authentication Semi-Quantum Key Agreement Protocol for the Internet of Medical Things Cover

Controlled Authentication Semi-Quantum Key Agreement Protocol for the Internet of Medical Things

By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Jun 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Healthcare model with CASQKA.

Figure 2.

Quantum circuit diagram for preparing and measuring a 4-Particle W States.

Figure 3.

Workflow of the proposed protocol.

Figure 4.

(a) Quantum circuit for case 1 in Table 2. (b) Quantum circuit for case 2 in Table 2 (similar to case 3 and case 5 in Table 2). (c) Quantum circuit for case 4 in Table 2 (similar to case 6 and case 7 in Table 2). (d) Quantum circuit for case 8 in Table 2.

Figure 5.

(a) Run results of (a) in Figure 4. (b) Run results of (b) in Figure 4. (c) Run results of (c) in Figure 4. (d) Run results of (d) in Figure 4.

Figure 6.

Measurement results of the quantum circuit in Figure 4 under noisy environment.

Figure 7.

Quantum bit error rate under various noise levels.

Figure 8.

Key generation rate under various noise levels.

Simulation-Experiment Parameter_

PlatformIBM Quantum
Software Development KitQiskit(2.1.1)
Noise parameters (amplitude damping noise, depolarizing noise)(0.001,0.01)(0.005,0.02)(0.01,0.03)(0.02,0.04)

Comparison of the proposed CASQKA protocol with other protocols_

ProtocolQuantum resourceIdentity authentication functionSemi-quantum propertiesQubit efficiency (%)
Ref. [36]Cluster statesNoYes2.08
Ref. [28]Cluster statesNoYes1.60
Ref. [39]Five qubit entangled statesYesNo7.70
Ref. [40]Bell statesNoYes6.70
Ref. [25]Bell statesYesNo16.67
Ref. [22]Four-particle GHZ statesYesNo53.33
Ref. [49]Single-particle statesYesNo16.67
Ref. [50]three-particle GHZ-like statesNoYes16.67
Proposed protocolW statesYesYes2.43

Communication complexity comparison_

MetricProposed protocolRef [5]
Quantum communication complexity30n qubitsn qubits
Classical communication complexity3n classical bits~0.5n classical bits
Total communication complexity33n bits1.5n bits
Qubit efficiency (η)3.03%~66.67%

All operational scenarios of Bob, Charlie, and Dave_

CaseBobCharlieDaveProtocol phase
1CTRLCTRLCTRL
2CTRLCTRLSIFT
3CTRLSIFTCTRL
4CTRLSIFTSIFTSecurity check
5SIFTCTRLCTRL
6SIFTCTRLSIFT
7SIFTSIFTCTRL
8SIFTSIFTSIFTKey agreement

Variable-Meaning_

IB, IC, IDBob/Charlie/Dave’s pre-shared identity bit strings (n bits)
KA, KB, KC, KDEach party’s private key string (n bits)
SA, SB, SC, SDThe four-particle sequences of the W state are held by Alice, Bob, Charlie, and Dave, respectively.
VB, VC, VDThe n-bit outcomes of Z-basis measurements performed by Bob/Charlie/Dave at the SIFT positions.
VB*VC*,VD*V_B^*V_C^*,V_D^*The XOR of the measurement outcome with the identity string, VB*={ VB(1)IB(1),VB(2)IB(2),VB(3)IB(3)VB(n)IB(n) }V_B^* = \left\{ {V_B^{(1)} \oplus I_B^{(1)},V_B^{(2)} \oplus I_B^{(2)},V_B^{(3)} \oplus I_B^{(3)} \ldots V_B^{(n)} \oplus I_B^{(n)}} \right\} used for authentication.
VAB, AC, VADThe classical bit string actually measured by Alice at the corresponding positions, used for comparison and verification.
RB,RC,RDRB,RC,RDK{{R_B},{R_C},{R_D}}The n-bit SIFT measurement results of Bob/Charlie/Dave in Case-8 used to conceal the private key the final 4-party shared key
KAB, KAC, KADThe key segments permuted by Alice using IB, IC, ID are sent to Bob/Charlie/Dave, respectively.

Encoding rules_

Quantum statesClassical bits
|0〉0
|1〉1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/qic-2026-0007 | Journal eISSN: 3106-0544 | Journal ISSN: 1533-7146
Language: English
Page range: 129 - 153
Submitted on: Oct 12, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 6, 2026
Published on: Jun 4, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Yefeng He, Liaoyuan Shen, Yichi Zhang, published by Cerebration Science Publishing Co., Limited
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.