Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Role of stenting in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: multiple challenges of the current approach Cover

Role of stenting in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: multiple challenges of the current approach

Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. AGREE Collaboration. (2003). Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: The AGREE project. Qual. Saf. Health Care, 12 (1), 18–23. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.1.18.10.1136/qhc.12.1.18174367212571340
  2. Al-Qahtani, A. S. (2012). Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tubing: A prospective randomized study. Amer. J. Rhinol. Allergy, 26 (4), 332–334. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3789.10.2500/ajra.2012.26.378922732136
  3. Ali, M. J., Baig, F., Lakshman, M., Naik, M. N. (2015a). Scanning electron microscopic features of nasolacrimal silastic stents retained for prolong durations following dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 31, 414–417. DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000395.10.1097/IOP.000000000000039525689783
  4. Ali. M. J., Manderwad, G., Naik, M. N. (2013). The microbiological spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity profile of extubated silicone stents following dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit, 32, 298–303. DOI: 10.3109/01676830.2013.815231.10.3109/01676830.2013.81523124024780
  5. Ali, M. J., Wormald, P. J., Psaltis, A. J. (2015b). The dacryocystorhinostomy ostium granulomas: Classification, indications for treatment, management modalities and outcomes. Orbit, 34, 146–151. DOI: 10.3109/01676830.2015.1014510.10.3109/01676830.2015.101451025901394
  6. Ben Simon, G. J., Joseph, J., Lee, S., Schwarcz, R. M., Mc-Cann, J. D., Goldberg, R. A. (2005). External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Oph-thalmology, 112, 1463–1468. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.03.015.10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.03.01515953636
  7. Caldwell, G. W. (1893). Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct, with preservation of the canaliculi and an incidental description of a new lacrimal probe. NY Med. J., 57, 581–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2011.52.12.1391.10.3341/jkos.2011.52.12.1391
  8. Callejas, C. A., Tewfik, M. A., Wormald, P. J. (2010). Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with selective stenting. Laryngoscope, 120 (7), 1449–1452. DOI: 10.1002/lary.20916.10.1002/lary.2091620564733
  9. Cavaliere, M., Luca, P. D., Scarpa, A., Bonis, E. D., Troisi, D. Cassandro, C., Concilio, G., D’Ascanio, L., Stadio, A. D. (2022). Longitudinal randomized study to evaluate the long-term outcome of endoscopic primary dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tube. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 279 (2), 1105–1109. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07104-w.10.1007/s00405-021-07104-w34586476
  10. Cetin, Y. S., Akin, R., Duzenli, U., Turan, M., Bozan, N. (2022).
  11. Effect of silver nitrate application on the success of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Amer. J. Rhinol. Allergy, 36 (2), 216–221. DOI: 10.1177/19458924211042786.10.1177/1945892421104278634499002
  12. Cheng, S. M., Feng, Y. F., Xu, L., Li, Y., Huang, J. H. (2013). Efficacy of mitomycin C in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. www.plosone.org. PMID: 23675423 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062737.10.1371/journal.pone.0062737365281323675423
  13. Chong, K. L. L., Lai, F. H. P., Ho, M., Luk, A., Wong, B. W., Young, A. (2013). Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology, 20 (10), 2139–2145. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.036.10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.03623672972
  14. Cokkeser, Y., Evereklioglu, C., Er, H. (2000). Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg., 123, 488–491. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.105470.10.1067/mhn.2000.10547011020191
  15. Fayers, T., Dolman, P. T. (2016). Bicanalicular silicone stents in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology, 123 (10), 2255–2259. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.026.10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.02627432206
  16. Gibbs, D. C. (1967). New probe for the intubation of lacrimal
  17. canaliculi with silicone rubber tubing. Brit. J. Opthalmol., 51, 198. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.51.3.198.10.1136/bjo.51.3.1985063616019817
  18. Huang, J., Malek, J., Chin, D., Snidvongs, D., Wilcsek, G., Tumuluri, K., Sacks, K., Harvey, R. J. (2014). Systematic review and meta-analysis on outcomes for endoscopic versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit, 33, 81–90. DOI: 10.3109/01676830.2013.842253.10.3109/01676830.2013.84225324354575
  19. Jo, A., Lee, S. H., Song, W. C., Shin, H. J. (2018). Effects of ostium granulomas and intralesional steroid injections on the surgical outcome in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol., 256, 1993–2000. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-4024-7.10.1007/s00417-018-4024-729858678
  20. Kaçaniku, G., Ajazaj, V., Shabani, A., Dida, E. (2018). Assessing the usefulness of different silicone tubes in external dacryocystorhinostomy. Med. Arch., 72, 414–417. DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.414-417.10.5455/medarh.2018.72.414-417634060830814772
  21. Kim, S. E., Lee, S. J., Lee, S. Y., Yoon, J. S. (2012). Clinical significance of microbial growth on the surfaces of silicone tubes removed from dacryocystorhinostomy patients. Amer. J. Ophthalmol., 153, 253–257. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.030.10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.03021920491
  22. Limbu, B., Lyons, H. S., Shrestha, M. K., Tabin, G. C., Saiju, R. (2019). Comparison of early versus standard timing for silicone stent removal following external dacrocystorhinostomy under local anaesthesia. Nepal J. Ophthalmol., 11 (21), 24–28. DOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v11i1.254013.
  23. Longari, F., Moboraki, P. D., Ricci, A. L., Lapenna, R., Cagini, C., Ricci, G. (2016). Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: 4 years retrospective study. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 273 (8), 2079–2084. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3876-2.10.1007/s00405-015-3876-226732693
  24. Nerad, J. A. (2010). Techniques in Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery. Saunders of imprint if Elsevier Inc. Book. 499 pp.
  25. Okuyucu, S., Gorur, H., Oksuz, H., Akoglu, E. (2015). Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone, polypropylene, and T-tube stents; randomized con-trolled trial of efficacy and safety. Amer. J. Rhinol. Allergy, 29, 63–68. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4119.10.2500/ajra.2015.29.411925590323
  26. Ricca, A. M., Kim, A. K., Chahal, H. S., Shriver, E. M. (2018). Nasolacrimal Stents: An Introductory Guide. EyeRounds.org. http://EyeRounds.org/tutorials/Stents/ (accessed 01.04.2022).
  27. Samimi, D. B., Ediriwickrema, L. S., Bielory, B. P., Miller, D., Lee, W., Johnson. T. E. (2016). Microbiology and biofilm trends of silicone lacrimal implants: Comparing infected versus routinely removed stents. Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 32 (6), 452–457. DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000590.10.1097/IOP.000000000000059026588208
  28. Singh, M. (2015). Lacrimal stents and intubation systems: An insight. Delhi J. Ophthalmol., 26 (1), 14–19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7869/djo.128.10.7869/djo.128
  29. Tsirbas, A., Davis, G., Wormald, P. J. (2004). Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 20, 50–56. DOI: 10.1097/01.IOP.0000103006.49679.23.10.1097/01.IOP.0000103006.49679.2314752311
  30. Ullrich, K., Malhotra, R., Patel, B.C. (2022). Dacryocystorhinostomy. http://www.pubmed.gov. PMID: 32496731 Bookshelf ID: NBK557851 (accessed 01.04.2022).
  31. Wakaki, S., Marumo, H., Tomioka, K. (1958). Isolation of new fractions of
  32. antitumor mitomycins. Antibiot Chemother., 8 (5), 228–240.
  33. Yim, M., Wormald, P.J., Doucet, M., Gill, A., Kingdom, T., Orlandi, R., Crum, A., Marx, D., Alt. J. (2021). Adjunctive techniques to dacryocystorhinostomy: An evidence-based review with recommendations. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol., 11 (5), 885–893. DOI: 10.1002/alr.22699.10.1002/alr.2269932981236
  34. Yu, B., Xia, Y., Sun, J. Y., Ye, Q., Tu, Y. H., Zhou, G. M., Wu, W. C. (2021). Surgical outcomes in acute dacryocystitis patients undergoing endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tube intubation. Int. J. Ophthalmol., 14 (6), 844–848. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2021.06.08.10.18240/ijo.2021.06.08816562834150538
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/prolas-2022-0090 | Journal eISSN: 2255-890X | Journal ISSN: 1407-009X
Language: English
Page range: 578 - 584
Published on: Dec 10, 2022
Published by: Latvian Academy of Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2022 Ekaterina Kondratishko, Dace Tjurina, Mihails Bekers-Ancipolovskis, Aleksejs Derovs, published by Latvian Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.