Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment of iPBS Primers Potential to Be Used in Genetic Diversity Studies of Wild Cloudberry (Rubus Chamaemorus L.) Populations Cover

Assessment of iPBS Primers Potential to Be Used in Genetic Diversity Studies of Wild Cloudberry (Rubus Chamaemorus L.) Populations

Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Auniņš, A. (2013). Eiropas Savienības aizsargājamie biotopi Latvijā. Noteikšanas rokasgrāmata [Europe Union protected habitats in Latvia]. Latvijas Dabas fonds, Rīga. 320 lpp.
  2. Doyle, J. J., Doyle, J. L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantities of fresh leaf tissues. Phytochem Bull., 19 (1), 11–15.
  3. Ehrich, D., Also, I. G., Brochmann, C. (2008). Where did northern peatland species survive the dry glacials? Cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus) as an example. J. Biogeogr., 35, 801–814.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01864.x
  4. Kachanovsky, I. M. (2015). Red Book of the Republic of Belarus. Plants: Rare and Endangered Species of Wild Plants [Качановский, И. M. Красная книга Республики Беларусь. Растения: редкие и находящиеся под угрозой исчезновения виды дикорастущих растении]. Belarusian Encyclopedia n/a Piatrus Browka, Minsk. 448 pp. (in Russian).
  5. Kalendar, R., Antonius, K., Smykal, P., Schulman, A. H. (2010). iPBS: A universal method for DNA fingerprinting and retrotransposon isolation. Theor. Appl. Genet., 121 (8), 1419–1430.10.1007/s00122-010-1398-2
  6. Korpelainen, H. (1994). Sex ratios and resource allocation among sexually reproducing plants of Rubus chamaemorus. Ann. Bot., 74, 627–632.10.1006/anbo.1994.1164
  7. Nilsen, G. S. (2005). Cloudberries – the Northern Gold. Int. J. Fruit Sci., 5 (2), 45–60.10.1300/J492v05n02_06
  8. Laiviņš, M., Bice, M., Krampis, I., Knape, Dz., Šmite, D., Šulcs, V. (2009). Latvijas kokaugu atlants [Atlas of Latvian Woody Plants]. Apgāds Mantojums, Rīga. 606 lpp. (in Latvian).
  9. Leišová-Svobodová, L., Phillips, J., Martinussen, I., Holubec, V. (2018). Genetic differentiation of Rubus chamaemorus populations in the Czech Republic and Norway after the last glacial period. Ecol. Evol., 00, 1–11.10.1002/ece3.4101
  10. Rantala, E. M. (1978). Sexual reproduction in the cloudberry. Ann. Agricult. Fenn., 15 (4), 295–303.
  11. Roldán-Ruiz, I., Dendauw, J., Van Bockstaele, E., Depicker, A., De Loose, M. (2000). AFLP markers reveal high polymorphic rates in ryegrasses (Lolium spp.). Mol. Breed., 6, 125–134.10.1023/A:1009680614564
  12. Soengas, P., Velasco, P., Padilla, G., Ordás, A., Cartes, M. E. (2006). Genetic relationships among Brassica napus crops based on SSR markers. Hort Sci., 41 (5), 1195–1199.10.21273/HORTSCI.41.5.1195
  13. Taylor, K. (1971). Biological flora of the British Isles: Rubus chamaemorus. J. Ecol., 59, 293–306.10.2307/2258468
  14. Thiem, B. (2003). Rubus chamaemorus L.: A boreal plant rich in biologically active metabolites: A review. Biol. Lett., 40, 3–13.
  15. Thiem, B., Sliwinska, E. (2003). Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus L.) in vitro cultures. Plant Sci., 164, 129–134.10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00344-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/prolas-2022-0045 | Journal eISSN: 2255-890X | Journal ISSN: 1407-009X
Language: English
Page range: 314 - 316
Submitted on: Aug 30, 2021
|
Accepted on: Nov 12, 2021
|
Published on: Jun 2, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2022 Nikole Krasņevska, Andra Miķelsone, Alesia Kruchonok, Isaak Rashal, Dalius Butkauskas, Dace Grauda, published by Latvian Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.