References
- A language and environment for statistical computing (2017). R Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org (accessed 01.12. 2020).
- Āboliņa, A., Piterāns, A., Bambe, B. (2015). Latvijas ķērpji un sūnas. Taksonu saraksts [Lichens and Bryophytes of Latvia. List of Taxons]. Saule, Daugavpils. 213 lpp. (in Latvian).
- Auniņš, A. (Ed.). (2013). European Union Protected Habitats in Latvia. Interpretation Manual. Latvian Fund for Nature, Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development, Rīga. 320 pp.
- Avotniece, Z., Aņiskeviča, S., Maļinovskis, E. (2017). Klimata pārmaiņu scenāriji Latvijai. Ziņojuma kopsavilkums [Climate Change Scenarios for Latvia. Summary]. Latvijas Vides, ģeoloģijas un meteoroloģijas centrs, Rīga. 16 lpp. (in Latvian).
- Bates, J. W. (1998). Is ‘life-form’ a useful concept in bryophyte ecology? Oikos, 82, 223–237.10.2307/3546962
- Bengtsson, J., Nilsson, S. G., Franc, A., Menozzi, P. (2000). Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests. Forest Ecol. Manag., 132, 39–50.10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00378-9
- Bernhardt-Römermann, M., Poschlod, P., Hentschel, J. (2018). BryForTrait: A life-history trait database of forest bryophytes. J. Veget. Sci., 29 (4), 798–800.10.1111/jvs.12646
- Boudreault, C., Coxson, D., Vincent, E., Bergeron, Y., Marsh, J. (2008). Variation in epiphytic lichen and bryophyte composition and diversity along a gradient of productivity in Populus tremuloides stands of northeastern British Columbia, Canada. Ecoscience, 15 (1), 101–112.10.2980/1195-6860(2008)15[101:VIELAB]2.0.CO;2
- Cleavitt, N. L. (2002). Stress tolerance of rare and common moss species in relation to their occupied environments and asexual dispersal potential. J. Ecol., 90 (5), 785–795.10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00713.x
- Convention on Biological Diversity. Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2021–2030. 2020. https://www.cbd.int/doc/strategic-plan/Post2020/Bubb.pdf (accessed 21. 12. 2020).
- Darell, P., Cronberg, N. (2011). Bryophytes in black alder swamps in south Sweden: Habitat classification, environmental factors and life-strategies. Lindbergia, 34, 9–29.
- Dieler, J., Uhl, E., Biber, P., Müller, J., Rötzer, T., Pretzsch, M. (2017). Effect of forest stand management on species composition, structural diversity, and productivity in the temperate zone of Europe. Eur. J. Forest Res., 136, 739–766.10.1007/s10342-017-1056-1
- Dittrich, S., Leuschner, C., Hauck, M. (2016). Change in the bryophyte diversity and species composition of Central European temperate broad-leaved forests since the late nineteenth century. Biodivers. Conserv., 25, 2071–2091.10.1007/s10531-016-1179-6
- During, H. J. (1979). Life strategies of bryophytes: A preliminary review. Lindbergia, 5, 2–18.
- During, H. J. (1992). Ecological classification of bryophytes and lichens. In: Bates, J. W., Farmer, A. M. (eds.). Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment. Claredon Press, Oxford, pp. 1–30
- Friedel, A., Oheimb, G. V., Dengler, J., Härdtle, W. (2006). Species diversity and species composition of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens: A comparison of managed and unmanaged beech forests in NE Germany. Feddes Repertorium, 117 (1–2), 172–185.10.1002/fedr.200511084
- Fritz, Ö., Brunet, J. (2010). Epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in Swedish beech forests: Effects of forest history and habitat quality. Ecol. Bull., 53, 95–107.
- Hedderson, T. A. (1992). Rarity at range limits: dispersal capacity and habitat relationships of extraneous moss species in a boreal Canadian national park. Biol. Conserv., 59, 113–120.10.1016/0006-3207(92)90569-9
- Ievinsh, G., Gaile, L., Elferts, D., Liepiņa, L. (2020). Relationship between functional traits, functional types, and habitat in boreonemoral bryophytes. Proc. Latvian Acad. Sci., Section B, 74 (3), 196–205.10.2478/prolas-2020-0031
- Ikauniece, S., Brūmelis, G., Zariņš, J. (2012). Linking woodland key habitat inventory and forest inventory data to prioritize districts needing conservation efforts. Ecol. Indicators, 14, 18–26.10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.009
- Király, I., Nascimbene, J., Tinya, F., Ódor, P. (2013). Factors influencing epiphytic bryophyte and lichen species richness at different spatial scales in managed temperate forests. Biodivers. Conserv., 22, 209–223.10.1007/s10531-012-0415-y
- Király, I., Ódor, P. (2010).The effect of stand structure and tree species composition on epiphytic bryophytes in mixed deciduous–coniferous forests of Western Hungary. Biol. Conserv., 143 (9), 2063–2069.10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.014
- Kürschner, H. (2004). Life strategies and adaptations in bryophytes from the Near and Middle East. Turkish J. Bot., 28, 73–84.
- Liepiņa, L. (2017). Īpaši aizsargājamās un reti sastopamās sūnu sugas Latvijā [Especially Protected and Rare Bryophyte Species in Latvia]. Latvijas vides aizsardzības fonds, Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde, Daugavpils Universitātes Dabas izpētes un vides izglītības centrs, Rīga. 154 pp. (in Latvian).
- Li, Y., Vitt, D. H. (1994). The dynamics of moss establishment: Temporal responses to nutrient gradients. The Bryologist, 97 (4), 357–364.10.2307/3243900
- Löbel, S., Snäll, T., Rydin, H. (2006). Species richness patterns and meta-population processes: Evidence from epiphyte communities in boreo-nemoral forests. Ecography, 29, 169–182.10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04348.x
- Lõhmus, A., Lõhmus, P. (2008). First-generation forests are not necessarily worse than long term managed forests for lichen and bryophytes. Restor. Ecol., 16 (2), 231–239.10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00266.x
- Lõhmus, A., Lõhmus, P., Vellak K. (2007). Substratum diversity explains landscape-scale co-variation in the species-richness of bryophytes and lichens. Biol. Conserv., 135, 405–414.10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.015
- Łubek, A., Kukwa, M., Czortek, P., Jaroszewicz, B. (2020). Impact of Fraxinus excelsior dieback on biota of ash-associated lichen epiphytes at the landscape and community level. Biodivers. Conserv., 29, 431–450.10.1007/s10531-019-01890-w
- Madžule, L., Brūmelis, G., Tērauds, A., Zariņš, J. (2012). Time needed to achieve sufficient richness of structural elements and bryophytes in deciduous forest stands. Environ. Exper. Biol., 10, 57–66.
- Mägdefrau, K. (1969). Die Lebensformen der Laubmoose. Vegetatio, 16, 285–297.
- Meža nozare skaitļos un faktos 2021 2020. [Forest Sector in Numbers and Facts 2021]. Zemkopības Ministrija. Publishers Zaļās mājas, Rīga. 53 lpp. (in Latvian).
- Mežaka, A., Brūmelis, G., Piterāns, A. (2012). Tree and stand-scale factors affecting richness and composition of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in deciduous woodland key habitats. Biodivers. Conserv., 21 (12), 3221–324.10.1007/s10531-012-0361-8
- Mežaka, A., Kirillova, J. (2019). Epiphytic bryophytes and lichens and their functional trait relationships with host characteristics in the Lūznava Manor Park. Acta Biol. Univ. Daugavp., 19 (2), 241–251.
- Michel, P., Lee, W. G., During, H. J., Cornelissen, J. H. C. (2012). Species traits and their non-additive interactions control the water economy of bryophyte cushions. J. Ecol., 100 (1), 222–231.10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01898.x
- Mitchell, R. J., Beaton, J. K., Bellamy, P. E., Chetcuti, J., Eaton, S., Ellis, C. J., Gimona, A., Harmer, R., Hester, A. J., Hewison, R. L. et al. 2014. Ash dieback in the UK: A review of the ecological and conservation implications and potential management options. Biol. Conserv., 175, 95–109.
- Nordčn, B., Paltto, H., Gotmark, F., Wallin, K. (2007). Indicators of biodiversity, what do they indicate? Lessons for conservation of cryptogams in oak-rich forest. Biol. Conserv., 135, 369–379.10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.007
- Patińo, J., González-Mancebo, J. M., Fernández-Palacios, J. M. (2009). Epiphytic bryophytes in Canarian subtropical montane cloud forests: The importance of the time since disturbance and host identity. Canad. J. Forest Res., 39, 48–63.10.1139/X08-155
- Peck, J. E. (2010). Multivariate Analysis for Community Ecologists: Step-by-Step using PC-ORD. MjM Software Design. Gleneden Beach, Oregon. 162 pp.
- Sjörs, H. (1963). Amphi-Atlantic zonation, nemoral to arctic. In: Löve, A., Löve, D. (eds.). North Atlantic Biota and Their History. New York, The Macmillan Company, pp. 109–125.
- Snäll, T., Hagström, A., Rudolphi, J., Rydin, H. (2004). Distribution pattern of the epiphyte Neckera pennata on three spatial scales: importance of past landscape structure, connectivity and local conditions. Ecography, 27, 757–766.10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.04026.x
- Söderström, L. (2006). Conservation biology of bryophytes. Lindbergia, 31, 24–32.
- Sporn, S. G., Bos, M. M., Kessler, M., Gradstein, S. R. (2010). Vertical distribution of epiphytic bryophytes in an Indonesian rainforest. Biodivers. Conserv., 19, 745–760.10.1007/s10531-009-9731-2
- Strazdiņa, L., Brūmelis, G., Rēriha, I. (2013). Life-form adaptations and substrate availability explain a 100-year post-grazing succession of bryophyte species in the Moricsala Strict Nature Reserve, Latvia. J. Bryol., 35 (1), 33–46.10.1179/1743282012Y.0000000029
- Timonen, J., Siitonen, J., Gustafsson, L., Kotiaho, J. S., Stokland, N. J., Sverdrup-Thygeson, A., Mönkkönen, M. (2010). Woodland key habitats in northern Europe: Concepts, inventory and protection. Scand. J. Forest Res., 25 (4), 309–324.10.1080/02827581.2010.497160
- Virtanen, R. (2012). Diaspore and shoot size as drivers of local, regional and global bryophyte distributions. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 23, 610–619.10.1111/geb.12128