Morphological Characterisation And Molecular Sex Determination Of Human Remains From The 15th–17th Centuries In Latvia
References
- Actiņš, A., Lūsēns, M., Rudoviča, V., Vīksna, A., Zariņa, G. (2009). Rīgas Sv. Ģertrūdes baznīcas kapsētas augsnes paraugu ķīmiskā sastāva izpēte [The study of chemical composition of soil samples from Riga St Gertrude’s Church cemetery]. In:(59.–70. lpp). Rīga: Latvijas vēstures institūta apgāds (in Latvian).
- Ascádi, G., Nemeskéri, J. (1970).. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
- Brickley, M., Ives, R. (2008).. Oxford: Academic Press.
- Bauer, C. M., Niederstätter, H., McGlynn, G., Stadler, H., Parson, W. (2013). Comparison of morphological and molecular genetic sex-typing on mediaeval human skeletal remains.,(6), 581–586.
- Brooks, S., Suchey, J. M. (1990). Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: A comparison of the Acsadi-Nemeskeri and Suchey-Brooks methods.,227–238.
- Bruzek, J. (2002). A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone.,, 157–168.
- Buckberry, J. L., Chamberlain, A. T. (2002). Age estimation from the auricular surface of the ilium: A revised method.,231–239.
- Buikstra, J. E., Ubelaker, D. H. (1994). Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains., Vol. 33). Fayetteville: Arkansas Archeological Survey. 218 pp.
- Cox, M., Mays, S. (2000).Greenwich Medical Media Ltd, London. 548 pp.
- Donoghue, H. D. (2008). Molecular palaeopathology of human infectious disease. In:Phinasi, R., Mays, S. (eds.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp. 147–176.
- Genove´s, S. (1959). L’estimation des diffe´rences sexuelles dans l’os coxal; differences me´triques et diffe´rences morphologiques [The estimation of sex differences in the hip bone; metric and morphological differences].,, 3–95 (in French).
- Grigorenko, A. P., Borinskaya, S. A., Yankovsky, N. K., Rogaev, E. I. (2009). Achievements and peculiarities in studies of ancient DNA and DNA from complicated forensic specimens.,(3), 58–69.
- Haas-Rochholz, H., Weiler, G. (1997) Additional primer sets for an amelogenin gene PCR-based DNA-sex test.,(6), 312–315.
- Hoyme, L. E., Iscan, M. Y. (1989). Determination of sex and race: Accuracy and assumptions. In:. Iscan, M. Y., Kennedy, K. A. D. (eds.). New York: Wiley & Sons, pp. 53–93.
- Li, S., Feng, T., Fu, L., Li, Z., Lou, C., Zhang, X., Ma, C., Cong, B. (2012). Pyrosequencing of a short fragment of the amelogenin gene for gender identification.,(6), 6949–6957.
- Lovejoy, C. O., Meindl, R. S., Mensforth, R. P., Barton, T. J. (1985) Multifactorial determination of skeletal age at death: A method and blind tests of its accuracy.,, 1–14.
- Lūsēns, M. (2008). Arheoloģiskie pētījumi Sv. Ģertrūdes baznīcas kapsētā Rīgā [Archaeological studies of St Gertrude Church cemetery in Riga]. In:. Zinātne, Rīga, pp. 143–151 (in Latvian).
- Mannucci, A., Sullivan, K. M., Ivanov, P. L., Gill, P. (1994) Forensic application of a rapid and quantitative DNA sex test by amplification of the X-Y homologous gene amelogenin.,, 190–193.
- Mays, S. (1992). Taphonomic factors in a human skeletal assemblage.,(2), 54–58.
- Meindl, R. S., Lovejoy, C. O. (1985). Ectocranial suture closure: A revised method for the determination of skeletal age at death based on the lateral–anterior sutures.,, 57–66.
- Milner, G. R. (1992).Manual prepared for the Dickson Mounds skeletal reburial project. Springfield: Illinois State Museum,
- Phenice, T. W. (1969). A newly developed visual methods of sexing the os pubis.,, 297–301.
- Santos, F. R., Pandya, A., Tyler-Smith, C. (1998). Reliability of DNA-based sex tests., 103.
- Saunders, S. R., Fitzgerald, C., Rogers, T., Dudar, C., McKillop, H. (1992). A test of several methods of skeletal age estimation using a documented archaelogical sample.,, 97–118.
- Spirģis, R. (2012). Rīgas Sv. Pētera baznīcas kapsētas apbedījumu stratigrāfija [Stratigraphy of the Riga’s St. Peter's Church cemetery burial]. In:(179.–225. lpp.). Rīga: Latvijas vēstures institūta apgāds (in Latvian).
- Stojanowski, C. M., Seidemann, R. M., Doran, G. H. (2002). Differential skeletal preservation at Windover Pond: Causes and consequences.,15–26.
- Tozzo, P., Giuliodori, A., Corato, S., Ponzano, E., Rodriguez, D., Caenazzo, L. (2013). Deletion of amelogenin Y-locus in forensics: Literature revision and description of a novel method for sex confirmation.,(5), 387–391.
- Waldron, T. (1987). The relative survival of the human skeleton: Implications for palaeopathology. In:(pp. 55–64). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
- Willerslev, E., Cooper, A. (2005). Ancient DNA.,, 3–16.
- Ye, J., Ji, A., Parra, E. J., Zheng, X., Jiang, C., Zhao, X., Hu, L., Tu, Z. (2004). A simple and efficient method for extracting DNA from old and burned bone.,(4), 754–759.
- Zapico, S. C., Ubelaker, D. H. (2013). Sex determination from dentin and pulp in a medicolegal context.,(12), 1379–1385.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/prolas-2014-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2255-890X (formerly 1407-009X) | Journal ISSN: 1407-009X
Language: English, Latvian
Page range: 8 - 13
Submitted on: Jun 12, 2014
Published on: Jul 14, 2015
Published by: Latvian Academy of Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:
© 2015 Asta Ščėsnaitė-Jerdiakova, Liāna Pliss, Guntis Gerhards, Elīna Pētersone Gordina, Agnija Gustiņa, Ilva Pole, Egija Zole, Jānis Ķimsis, Inta Jansone, Renāte Ranka, published by Latvian Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.