Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Morphological Characterisation And Molecular Sex Determination Of Human Remains From The 15th–17th Centuries In Latvia Cover

Morphological Characterisation And Molecular Sex Determination Of Human Remains From The 15th–17th Centuries In Latvia

Open Access
|Jul 2015

References

  1. Actiņš, A., Lūsēns, M., Rudoviča, V., Vīksna, A., Zariņa, G. (2009). Rīgas Sv. Ģertrūdes baznīcas kapsētas augsnes paraugu ķīmiskā sastāva izpēte [The study of chemical composition of soil samples from Riga St Gertrude’s Church cemetery]. In: Senā Rīga 6: Pilsētas arheoloģija, arhitektūra (59.–70. lpp). Rīga: Latvijas vēstures institūta apgāds (in Latvian).
  2. Ascádi, G., Nemeskéri, J. (1970). History of Human Lifespan and Mortality. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
  3. Brickley, M., Ives, R. (2008). The Bioarchaeology of Metabolic Bone Disease. Oxford: Academic Press.
  4. Bauer, C. M., Niederstätter, H., McGlynn, G., Stadler, H., Parson, W. (2013). Comparison of morphological and molecular genetic sex-typing on mediaeval human skeletal remains. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 7 (6), 581–586.10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.05.005382002023941903
  5. Brooks, S., Suchey, J. M. (1990). Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: A comparison of the Acsadi-Nemeskeri and Suchey-Brooks methods. Hum. Evol., 5, 227–238.10.1007/BF02437238
  6. Bruzek, J. (2002). A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 117, 157–168.10.1002/ajpa.1001211815949
  7. Buckberry, J. L., Chamberlain, A. T. (2002). Age estimation from the auricular surface of the ilium: A revised method. J. Phys. Anthropol., 119, 231–239.10.1002/ajpa.1013012365035
  8. Buikstra, J. E., Ubelaker, D. H. (1994). Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Proceedings of a Seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History (Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series, Vol. 33). Fayetteville: Arkansas Archeological Survey. 218 pp.
  9. Cox, M., Mays, S. (2000). Human Osteology in Archaeology and Forensic Science. Greenwich Medical Media Ltd, London. 548 pp.
  10. Donoghue, H. D. (2008). Molecular palaeopathology of human infectious disease. In: Advances of Human Palaeopathology. Phinasi, R., Mays, S. (eds.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp. 147–176.
  11. Genove´s, S. (1959). L’estimation des diffe´rences sexuelles dans l’os coxal; differences me´triques et diffe´rences morphologiques [The estimation of sex differences in the hip bone; metric and morphological differences]. Bull. Mem. Soc. Anthropol. Paris, 10, 3–95 (in French).
  12. Grigorenko, A. P., Borinskaya, S. A., Yankovsky, N. K., Rogaev, E. I. (2009). Achievements and peculiarities in studies of ancient DNA and DNA from complicated forensic specimens. Acta Naturae, 1 (3), 58–69.10.32607/20758251-2009-1-3-58-69
  13. Haas-Rochholz, H., Weiler, G. (1997) Additional primer sets for an amelogenin gene PCR-based DNA-sex test. Int. J. Legal Med., 110 (6), 312–315.10.1007/s0041400500949387013
  14. Hoyme, L. E., Iscan, M. Y. (1989). Determination of sex and race: Accuracy and assumptions. In: Reconstruction of Life from the Skeleton. Iscan, M. Y., Kennedy, K. A. D. (eds.). New York: Wiley & Sons, pp. 53–93.
  15. Li, S., Feng, T., Fu, L., Li, Z., Lou, C., Zhang, X., Ma, C., Cong, B. (2012). Pyrosequencing of a short fragment of the amelogenin gene for gender identification. Mol. Biol. Rep., 39 (6), 6949–6957.10.1007/s11033-012-1522-222311027
  16. Lovejoy, C. O., Meindl, R. S., Mensforth, R. P., Barton, T. J. (1985) Multifactorial determination of skeletal age at death: A method and blind tests of its accuracy. Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., 68, 1–14.
  17. Lūsēns, M. (2008). Arheoloģiskie pētījumi Sv. Ģertrūdes baznīcas kapsētā Rīgā [Archaeological studies of St Gertrude Church cemetery in Riga]. In: Arheologu pētījumi Latvijā 2006. un 2007. gadā. Zinātne, Rīga, pp. 143–151 (in Latvian).
  18. Mannucci, A., Sullivan, K. M., Ivanov, P. L., Gill, P. (1994) Forensic application of a rapid and quantitative DNA sex test by amplification of the X-Y homologous gene amelogenin. Int. J. Leg. Med., 106, 190–193.
  19. Mays, S. (1992). Taphonomic factors in a human skeletal assemblage. Circaea, 9(2), 54–58.
  20. Meindl, R. S., Lovejoy, C. O. (1985). Ectocranial suture closure: A revised method for the determination of skeletal age at death based on the lateral–anterior sutures. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 8, 57–66.10.1002/ajpa.13306801064061602
  21. Milner, G. R. (1992). Determination of Skeletal Age and Sex. Manual prepared for the Dickson Mounds skeletal reburial project. Springfield: Illinois State Museum,
  22. Phenice, T. W. (1969). A newly developed visual methods of sexing the os pubis. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 30, 297–301.10.1002/ajpa.13303002145772048
  23. Santos, F. R., Pandya, A., Tyler-Smith, C. (1998). Reliability of DNA-based sex tests. Nat. Genet.18, 103.10.1038/ng0298-1039462733
  24. Saunders, S. R., Fitzgerald, C., Rogers, T., Dudar, C., McKillop, H. (1992). A test of several methods of skeletal age estimation using a documented archaelogical sample. Can. Soc. For. Sci., 25, 97–118.
  25. Spirģis, R. (2012). Rīgas Sv. Pētera baznīcas kapsētas apbedījumu stratigrāfija [Stratigraphy of the Riga’s St. Peter's Church cemetery burial]. In: Senā Rīga 7: Pētījumi pilsētas arheoloģijā un vēsturē (179.–225. lpp.). Rīga: Latvijas vēstures institūta apgāds (in Latvian).
  26. Stojanowski, C. M., Seidemann, R. M., Doran, G. H. (2002). Differential skeletal preservation at Windover Pond: Causes and consequences. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 119, 15–26.10.1002/ajpa.1010112209570
  27. Tozzo, P., Giuliodori, A., Corato, S., Ponzano, E., Rodriguez, D., Caenazzo, L. (2013). Deletion of amelogenin Y-locus in forensics: Literature revision and description of a novel method for sex confirmation. J. Forensic. Leg. Med., 20 (5), 387–391.10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.01223756502
  28. Waldron, T. (1987). The relative survival of the human skeleton: Implications for palaeopathology. In: Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science (pp. 55–64). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  29. Willerslev, E., Cooper, A. (2005). Ancient DNA. Proc. R. Soc., 272, 3–16.
  30. Ye, J., Ji, A., Parra, E. J., Zheng, X., Jiang, C., Zhao, X., Hu, L., Tu, Z. (2004). A simple and efficient method for extracting DNA from old and burned bone. J. Forensic. Sci., 49 (4), 754–759.10.1520/JFS2003275
  31. Zapico, S. C., Ubelaker, D. H. (2013). Sex determination from dentin and pulp in a medicolegal context. J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 144 (12), 1379–1385.10.14219/jada.archive.2013.007424282268
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/prolas-2014-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2255-890X | Journal ISSN: 1407-009X
Language: English
Page range: 8 - 13
Submitted on: Jun 12, 2014
Published on: Jul 14, 2015
Published by: Latvian Academy of Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2015 Asta Ščėsnaitė-Jerdiakova, Liāna Pliss, Guntis Gerhards, Elīna Pētersone Gordina, Agnija Gustiņa, Ilva Pole, Egija Zole, Jānis Ķimsis, Inta Jansone, Renāte Ranka, published by Latvian Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.