Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysis of EEG Characteristics and Coherence in Patients Diagnosed as Borderline Personality Cover

Analysis of EEG Characteristics and Coherence in Patients Diagnosed as Borderline Personality

Open Access
|Feb 2020

References

  1. 1. Widiger TA, Weissman MM. Epidemiology of borderline personality disorder. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1991; 42: 1015–21.
  2. 2. Stern A. Psychoanalytic Investigation of and therapy in the border line group of neuroses. Psycho-anal Q 1938; 7: 467–89.10.1080/21674086.1938.11925367
  3. 3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th Edition: DSM-5. Washington D. C.: Author (2013).10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
  4. 4. Biskin R, Paris J. Diagnosing borderline personality disorder. CMAJ. 2012 Nov 6; 184(16): 1789–1794.10.1503/cmaj.090618
  5. 5. Lind M, Vanwoerden S, Penner F, Sharp C. In-patient adolescents with borderline personality disorder features: Identity diffusion and narrative incoherence. Personal Disord. 2019 Apr 29. doi: 10.1037/per0000338. [Epub ahead of print]10.1037/per0000338
  6. 6. Kerr IB, Finlayson-Short L, McCutcheon LK, Beard H, Chanen AM. The ‘Self’ and Borderline Personality Disorder: Conceptual and Clinical Considerations. Psychopathology. 2015; 48(5): 339–48. doi: 10.1159/000438827. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
  7. 7. Sarah l. Tragesser, Marika Solhan, Whitney c. Brown, Rachel l. Tomko, Courtney Bagge, and Timothy j. Trull, Longitudinal associations in borderline personality disorder features: diagnostic interview for borderlines – revised (dib-r) scores over time. J Pers Disord. 2010 jun; 24(3): 377–391.10.1521/pedi.2010.24.3.377
  8. 8. (Nunez, P. Neocortical dynamics and human EEG rhythms. Oxford University Press, New York (1995).
  9. 9. Nunez et al. (1997). Nunez PL, Srinivasan R, Westdorp AF, Wijesinghe RS, Tucker DM, Silberstein RB, Cadusch PJ. EEG coherency. I: statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1997; 103: 499–515.
  10. 10. Nunez PL, Silberstein RB, Shi Z, Carpenter MR, Srinvasan R, Tucker DM, Doran SM, Cadusch PJ, Wijesinghe RS: EEG Coherency II: Experimental comparisons of multiple measures. Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 110: 469–486.10.1016/S1388-2457(98)00043-1
  11. 11. Vysata O, Kukal J, Prochazka A, Pazdera L, Simko J, Valis M. Age-related changes in EEG coherence. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2014 Jan-Feb; 48(1): 3 5–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2013.09.001. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
  12. 12. Duffy FH, Jones KH, McAnulty GB, Albert MS: Spectral coherence in normal adults: unrestricted principal components analysis – relation of factors to age, gender, and neuropsychologic data. Clin Electroencephalogr 1995, 26: 30–46.10.1177/1550059495026001067882541
  13. 13. Robert Thatcher, D North, C Biver. Mechanism and significance of global coherence in scalp EEG. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2014; 31C: 199–205.10.1016/j.conb.2014.11.00825506772
  14. 14. Silvana Markovska-Simoska, Nada Pop-Jordanova, Jordan Pop-Jordanov. EEG inter and intra-hemispheric coherence study in adults with psychiatric disorders CONTRIBUTIONS. Sec. of Med. Sci., XXXIX 2–3, 2018: 5–19.10.2478/prilozi-2018-003730864354
  15. 15. Mark A. Kramer, An Introduction to Field Analysis Techniques: The Power Spectrum and Coherence, Kramer, 2013 Department of Mathematics and Statistics Boston University Boston, Massachusetts, MATLAB.
  16. 16. Saunders et al. (2016) Saunders, A. Kirk, I. J. and Waldie, K. E. (2016). Hemispheric Coherence in ASD with and without Comorbid ADHD and Anxiety, BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 4267842, 12 pages, 2016.
  17. 17. Sarnthein J., Daniel Jeanmonod D. High Thalamocortical Theta Coherence in Patients with Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neuroscience 3 January 2007; 27 (1): 124–131.
  18. 18. Luyten P, Campbell C, Fonagy P. EEG and intelligence: Relations between EEG coherence, EEG phase delay and power. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2005; 116(9): 2129–41.10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.02616043403
  19. 19. Coben, R., and Myers, T. Connectivity theory of autism: use of connectivity measure in assessing and treating autistic disorders. J. Neurother. 2008; 12: 161–179. doi: 10.1080/1087420080239882410.1080/10874200802398824
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/prilozi-2020-0005 | Journal eISSN: 1857-8985 | Journal ISSN: 1857-9345
Language: English
Page range: 57 - 68
Published on: Feb 27, 2020
Published by: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Nada Pop-Jordanova, Silvana Markovska-Simoska, Maja Milovanovic, Dusica Lecic-Tosevski, published by Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.