Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of Pain Following the Use of Scalpel Versus Electrosurgery for Skin Incisions in the Facial Regions Cover

Evaluation of Pain Following the Use of Scalpel Versus Electrosurgery for Skin Incisions in the Facial Regions

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. 1. Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Segelcke D, Schug SA. Postoperative pain - from mechanisms to treatment. Pain Reports. 2017; 2(2): e588. doi:10.1097/PR9.0000000000000588.10.1097/PR9.0000000000000588577017629392204
  2. 2. Diva Shrestha. Evaluation of pain following the use of scalpel versus diathermy for skin incisions in Ear, Nose, Throat and Head and Neck surgeries. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2018 Jan-Mar; 16(38): 58–60.10.3126/jnhrc.v16i1.19367
  3. 3. Petrovski M, Kaftandziev I, Petrovski D, Zhogovska E, Cvetanovski V, Todorovik L, et al. Surgical propaedeutics, practicum for exercises. 1 edition. Skopje: Makavej, 2006.
  4. 4. Scalpel in Wikipedia. Retrieved June 16, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalpel.
  5. 5. Пановски М. Електрохирургија. Скопје: Табернакул: 2013.
  6. 6. Elbohoty AE, Gomaa MF, Abdelaleim M, Abd-El-Gawad M, Elmarakby M, Diathermy versus scalpel in transverse abdominal incisions in woman undergoing repeated cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Oct;41(10): 1541-6.doi: 10.1111/jog.12776.10.1111/jog.1277626446416
  7. 7. Mirza F, Beenish Bareeqa S, Alam JM, Husein SI, Ahmed SI. Pain scores of scalpel versus Diathermy Skin Incisions in Head and Neck Surgeries. Glob J Otolaryngol 2018, Issue 3, vol 16. doi: 10.19080/GJO.2018.16.55593610.19080/GJO.2018.16.555936
  8. 8. Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, Chandler JG (1998) High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surgical endoscopy 12(6): 876–888.10.1007/s0046499007339602010
  9. 9. Harold KL, Pollinger H, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Sing RF, et al. (2003) Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 17(8): 1228–1230.10.1007/s00464-002-8833-7
  10. 10. Landman J, Kerbl K, Rehman J, Andreoni C, Humphrey PA, et al. (2003) Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. The Journal of urology. 169(2): 697–700.10.1097/00005392-200302000-00067
  11. 11. Takada M, Ichihara T, Kuroda Y (2005) Comparative study ofelectrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomy. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 19(2): 226–228.10.1007/s00464-004-9072-x15573241
  12. 12. Kearns SR, Connolly EM, McNally S, McNamara DA, Deasy J. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective mid-line laparotomy. Br J Surg. 2001 Jan;88(1):41-4. PubMed PMID: 11136307.10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01625.x11136307
  13. 13. Ayandipo OO, Afuwape OO, Irabor D, Oluwatosin OM, Odigie V. Diathermy versus Scalpel Incision in a Heterogeneous Cohort of General Surgery Patients in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. Nigerian Journal of Surgery: Official Publication of the Nigerian Surgical Research Society. 2015; 21(1): 43–47. doi:10.4103/1117-6806.153193.10.4103/1117-6806.153193438264225838766
  14. 14. Charoenkwan K, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z, Rerkasem K, Matovinovic E. Scalpel versus electrosurgery for major abdominal incisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD005987. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD005987.pub3.10.1002/14651858.CD005987.pub3648151428931203
  15. 15. Kumar V, Tewari M, Shukla HS. A comparative study of scalpel and surgical diathermy incision in elective operations of head and neck cancer. Indian J Cancer. 2011 Apr-Jun; 48(2): 216–9. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.82904. PubMed PMID: 21768669.10.4103/0019-509X.82904.PubMedPMID:21768669
  16. 16. Chalya PL, Mchembe MD, Mabula JB, Gilyoma JM. Diathermy versus Scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy: A prospective randomized controlled clinical study. East and Central Afric J Surg. 2013; 18(1): 71–7.
  17. 17. Talpur AA, Khaskheli AB, Kella N, Jamal A. Randomized, Clinical Trial on Diathermy and Scalpel Incisions in Elective General Surgery. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2015; 17(2): e14078. doi:10.5812/ircmj.14078.10.5812/ircmj.14078
  18. 18. Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, Reinke CE, Morgan S, Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Dellinger EP, Itani KMF, Berbari EF, Segreti J, Parvizi J, Blanchard J, Allen G, Kluytmans JAJW, Donlan R, Schecter WP; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017 May 3. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 28467526.10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904.[Epubaheadofprint]PubMedPMID:28467526
  19. 19. Chrysos E, Athanasakis E, Antonakakis S, Xynos E, Zoras O. A prospective study comparing diathermy and scalpel incisions in tension-free inguinal hernioplasty. Am Surg. 2005 Apr;71(4): 326–9. PubMed PMID: 15943407.10.1177/00031348050710041015943407
  20. 20. Ayandipo OO, Afuwape OO, Irabor D, Oluwatosin OM, Odigie V. Diathermy versus Scalpel Incision in a Heterogeneous Cohort of General Surgery Patients in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. Nigerian Journal of Surgery: Official Publication of the Nigerian Surgical Research Society. 2015; 21(1): 43–47. doi:10.4103/1117-6806.153193.10.4103/1117-6806.153193438264225838766
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/prilozi-2018-0048 | Journal eISSN: 1857-8985 | Journal ISSN: 1857-9345
Language: English
Page range: 107 - 112
Published on: Dec 31, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Margarita Peneva, Andrijana Gjorgjeska, Smilja Tudzarova Gjorgova, Boro Dzonov, Lazo Noveski, Vladimir Ginoski, Roza Dzoleva Tolevska, Hristina Breshkovska, published by Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.