References
- 1. Horner MJ, Ries LA, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2006. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csp/1975_2006.
- 2. Crane JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1058-62.10.1097/00006250-200311000-00031
- 3. Kainz C, Gitsch G, Heinzl Hm Breitenecker G. Incidence of cervical smears indicating dysplasia among Austrian women durign the 1980s. Br. J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:541-4.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11357.x
- 4. Ting J, Kruzikas DT, Smith JS. A global review of age-specific and overall prevalence of cervical lesions. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 2010;20:1244–9.10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181f16c5f
- 5. Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK et al. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;121(4):829-46.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182883a34
- 6. Kyrgiou M, Kaliopoulos G, Martin – Hirsch P. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta–analysis. Lancet 2006;367:489–98.10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68181-6
- 7. Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G, Soutter WP. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(11):985–93.10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70283-8
- 8. Oliveira CA, Russomano FB, Gomes Júnior SC, Corrêa FM. Risk of persistent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion after electrosurgical excisional treatment with positive margins: a meta-analysis. Sao Paulo Med J 2012;130:119-25.10.1590/S1516-31802012000200009
- 9. Lu CH, Liu FS, Kuo CJ, Chang CC, Ho ES. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization forcervical intraepithelial neoplasia III. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:830-5.10.1097/01.AOG.0000206777.28541.fc16582119
- 10. Tillmanns TD, Falkner CA, Engle DB, Wan JY, Mannel RS, Walker JL, et al. Preoperative predictors of positive margins after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure-Cone. Gynecol Oncol 2006;100:379-84.10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.09.01516321430
- 11. Paraskevaidis E, Lolis ED, Koliopoulos G, Alamanos Y, Fotiou S, Kitchener HC. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after large loop excision with clear margins. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:828-31.10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00791-2
- 12. Kietpeerakool C, Khunamornpong S, Srisomboon J, Siriaunkgul S, Suprasert P. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease? J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2007;33:660-4.10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00628.x17845326
- 13. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(12):2893-917.10.1002/ijc.2551621351269
- 14. Herbert A, Smith JA. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CIN III) and invasive cervical carcinoma: the yawning gap revisited and the treatment of risk. Cytopathology 1999; 10:161-70.10.1046/j.1365-2303.1999.00169.x10390064
- 15. Narducci F, Occelli B, Boman F, Vinatier D, Leroy JL. Positive margins after conization and risk of persistent lesion. Gynecologic Oncology 2000;76:311–4.10.1006/gyno.1999.569710684702
- 16. Mohamed-Noor K, Quinn MA, Tan J. Outcomes after cervical cold knife conization with complete and incomplete excision of abnormal epithelium: a review of 699 cases. Gynecologic Oncology 1997;67:34–8.10.1006/gyno.1997.48179345353
- 17. Jakus S, Edmonds P, Dunton C, King SA. Margin status and excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a review. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 2000;55:520–7.10.1097/00006254-200008000-0002510945195
- 18. Leguevaque P, Motton S, Decharme A, Soule-Tholy M, Escourrou G, Hoff J. Predictors of recurrence in high-grade cervical lesions and a plan of management. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2010;36:1073–9.10.1016/j.ejso.2010.08.13520870375
- 19. Baloglu A, Uysal D, Bezircioglu I, Bicer M, Inci A. Residual and recurrent disease rates following LEEP treatment in high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2010;282:69–73.10.1007/s00404-009-1298-319940997
- 20. Chen Y, Lu H, Wan X, Lv W, Xie X. Factors associated with positive margins in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and postconization management. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009;107:107–10.10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.05.02719628208
- 21. Chang D-Y, Cheng W-F, Torng P-L, Chen R-J, Huang S-C. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;63:53–6.10.1006/gyno.1996.02778898168
- 22. Kliemann LM, Silva M, Reinheimer M, Rivoire WA, Capp E, Dos Reis R. Minimal cold knife conization height for high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 165: 342-6.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.08.01622948133
- 23. Papoutsis D, Rodolakis A, Mesogitis S, Sotiropoulou M, Antsaklis A. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2013; 75: 163-8.10.1159/00034586423296191
- 24. Milinovic D, Kalafatic D, Babic D, Oreskovic LB, Grsic HL, Oreskovic S. Minimally invasive therapy ofcervical intraepithelial neoplasia for fertility preservation. Pathol Oncol Res 2009;15:521-5.10.1007/s12253-009-9148-y
- 25. Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J, Meyer P, Philippe E. Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 933-8. [Crossref]10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00331-6
- 26. Girardi F, Heydarfadai M, Koroschetz F, Pickel H, Winter R. Cold-knife conization versus loop excision: histopathologic and clinical results of a randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 55: 368-70. [Crossref]10.1006/gyno.1994.13087835776
- 27. Andia D, Mozo de Rosales F, Villasante A, Rivero B, Diez J, Perez C. Pregnancy outcome in patients treated with cervical conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 112: 225-8. [Crossref]10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.01521247572