References
- 1. Bleyaert A, Soetens M, Vaes L, Van Steenberge L, Van der Donck A. Bupivacaine, 0,125 per cent, in obstetric epidural analgesia: Experience in three thousand cases. Anesthesiolgy. 1979; 51: 435–8.
- 2. Gambling DR, Yu P, Cole C, McMorland GH, Pal mer L A. Comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour. Can J Anaesth. 1988; 35: 249–54.
- 3. Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo CE. Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a preliminary study on a novel approach of providing pain relief in labour. Singapore Med J. 2006; 47: 951–6.
- 4. Wong CA, Ratliff JT, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Toledo P, McCarthy RJ. A randomized comparation of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2006; 102: 904–9.
- 5. Petry J, Vercauteren M, Van Mol I, Van Houwe P, Adriaensen HA. Epidural PCA with bupivacaine 0.125%, sufentanil 0.75 microgram and epinephrine 1/800.000 for labor analgesia: is a background in fusion beneficial? Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2000; 51(3): 163–6.
- 6. M. van der Vyver, S. Halpern and G. Joseph. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 89: 459–65.
- 7. Niels Koopmans, Götz J. K. Wietasch and Michel M. R. F. Struys. Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia regimens for labor analgesia: Background infusion or demand-only? Anesth Analg July. 2009; 109: 284– 91.
- 8. Srivastava U, Gupta A, Saxena S, Kumar A, Singh S, Saraswat N, Mishra AR, Kannaujia A, Mishra S. Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia during labour: Effect of addition of background infusion on quality of analgesia & maternal satisfaction. Indian J Anaesth. 2009; 53(6): 649–53.
- 9. Stephen H. Halpern and Brendan Carvalho. Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for labour. Anesth Analg. 2009; 108(3): 921–8.
- 10. Boselli E, Debon R, Cimino Y, Rimmele T, Allaouchiche B, Chassard D. Background infusion is not beneficial during labor patient-controlled analgesia with 0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 microg/ml sufentanil. Anesthesiology. 2004; 100(4): 968–72.
- 11. Kaynar A. Murat. Epidural Infusion: Continuous or Bolus? Anesth Analg. 1999; 89: 534–540.
- 12. Wilson MJ, Cooper G, MacArthur C, Shennan A. Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) study group UK. Effect of low dose mo bile versus traditional epidural technique on mode of delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2002; 97(6): 1567–75.
- 13. Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S, Farcomeni A. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: The effects of maternal motor function and labor out come. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women. Anesth Analg. 2011; 113: 826–31.
- 14. Breen TW, Shapiro T, Glass B, Foster-Payne D, Oriol NE. Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambu latory patient. Anesth Analg. 1993; 77: 919–24.
- 15. Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo C. Automated regular bo luses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with con tinuous infusion. Int Obstet Anesth. 2005; 14: 305–9.
- 16. Wilson MJA, MacArthur C, Cooper GM, Shennan A. Ambulation in labour and delivery mode: a rando mised controlled trial of high-dose vs mobile epidural analgesia. Anaesthesia. 2009; 64: 266–72.
- 17. Martin EJ, Ruth DJ. Caring for the laboring woman. In: Kenedy BB, Ruth DJ, Martin EJ, editors. Intrapartum manamgement modules. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Wolter Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2009. p. 134–5.
- 18. Chua SM, Sia AT. Automated intermittent epidural boluses improve analgesia induced by intrathecal fentanyl during labour. Can J Anaesth. 2004; 51: 581–5.
- 19. Fettes PD, Moore CS, Whitesede JB, McLeod GA, Wildsmith JA. Intermittent vs continous administration of epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl for anal gesia during labour. Brit J Anaesth. 2006; 97: 359– 64.
- 20. George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infu sions for labor analgesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anesth Analg. 2013; 116: 133–44.
- 21. Ruppen W, Derry S, McQuay H, Moore A. Incidence of epidural hematoma, infection, and neurologic injury in obstetric patients with epidural analge sia/anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2006; 105: 394–9.
- 22. Beilin Y, Guinn NR, Bernestein HH, Zahn J. Local anaesthetics and mode of delivery: bupivacaine ver sus ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2007; 105: 756–63.
- 23. Halpern S. Recent advances in patient –controlled epidural analgesia. Curr Opion Anesth. 2005; 18: 247–51.
- 24. Sheng-Huan Ch. et al. Comparison of Patient-contro lled Epidural Analgesia and Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Analgesia. Chang Gung Med J. 2006; 29: 576–82.
- 25. Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo CE. Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a preliminary study on a novel approach of providing pain relief in labour. Singapore Med J. 2006; 47: 951–56.
- 26. Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo C. A comparison of basal infusion with automatic mandatory boluses in par turient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor. Anesth Analg. 2007; 104: 673–38.
- 27. Toledo P, Sun J, Grobman WA, Wong CA, Feinglass J, Hasnain-Wynia R. Racial and ethnic disparities in neuraxial labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2012; 114(1): 172–78.
- 28. Jiménez-Puente, et al. Ethnic differences in the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia. BMC Health Services Research. 2012; 12: 207–11.
- 29. Christiaens, et al. Pain acceptance and personal con trol in pain relief in two maternity care models: a cross-national comparison of Belgium and the Net herlands. BMC Health Services Research. 2010; 10: 268–70.
- 30. Tasnim S. Perception about Pain Relief During Nor mal Labour Among Health Care Providers Con ducting Delivery. Med Today. 2010; 22(1): 20–23.
- 31. Glance et al. Racial Differences in the Use of Epidural Analgesia for Labor. Anesthesiology. 2007; 106: 19–25.
- 32. Bauchat R. J, et al. Prior lumbar discectomy surgery does not alter the efficacy of neuroaxial labour anal gesia. Anesth Analg. 2012; 115: 348–53.
- 33. Unintentional Dural puncture with a Touhy Needle Increases Risk of Chronic Headache. Anesth Analg. 2012; 115: 124–32.
- 34. Can S. O, Yilmaz A. A, Hasdogan M, Alkaya F, Turhan C. S, Can F. M, Alanoglu Z. Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Cosolidated Standards of repor ting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011; 28: 485–92.