Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Continuous Versus Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labour Analgesia and Their Effects on Maternal Motor Function and Ambulation Cover

Continuous Versus Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labour Analgesia and Their Effects on Maternal Motor Function and Ambulation

PRILOZI
Volume 35 (2014): Issue 2 (October 2014)
By: ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Dec 2014
References

References

  1. 1. Bleyaert A, Soetens M, Vaes L, Van Steenberge L, Van der Donck A. Bupivacaine, 0,125 per cent, in obstetric epidural analgesia: Experience in three thousand cases. Anesthesiolgy. 1979; 51: 435–8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Gambling DR, Yu P, Cole C, McMorland GH, Pal mer L A. Comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour. Can J Anaesth. 1988; 35: 249–54.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo CE. Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a preliminary study on a novel approach of providing pain relief in labour. Singapore Med J. 2006; 47: 951–6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Wong CA, Ratliff JT, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Toledo P, McCarthy RJ. A randomized comparation of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2006; 102: 904–9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Petry J, Vercauteren M, Van Mol I, Van Houwe P, Adriaensen HA. Epidural PCA with bupivacaine 0.125%, sufentanil 0.75 microgram and epinephrine 1/800.000 for labor analgesia: is a background in fusion beneficial? Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2000; 51(3): 163–6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. M. van der Vyver, S. Halpern and G. Joseph. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 89: 459–65.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Niels Koopmans, Götz J. K. Wietasch and Michel M. R. F. Struys. Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia regimens for labor analgesia: Background infusion or demand-only? Anesth Analg July. 2009; 109: 284– 91.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Srivastava U, Gupta A, Saxena S, Kumar A, Singh S, Saraswat N, Mishra AR, Kannaujia A, Mishra S. Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia during labour: Effect of addition of background infusion on quality of analgesia & maternal satisfaction. Indian J Anaesth. 2009; 53(6): 649–53.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Stephen H. Halpern and Brendan Carvalho. Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for labour. Anesth Analg. 2009; 108(3): 921–8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Boselli E, Debon R, Cimino Y, Rimmele T, Allaouchiche B, Chassard D. Background infusion is not beneficial during labor patient-controlled analgesia with 0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 microg/ml sufentanil. Anesthesiology. 2004; 100(4): 968–72.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Kaynar A. Murat. Epidural Infusion: Continuous or Bolus? Anesth Analg. 1999; 89: 534–540.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Wilson MJ, Cooper G, MacArthur C, Shennan A. Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) study group UK. Effect of low dose mo bile versus traditional epidural technique on mode of delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2002; 97(6): 1567–75.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S, Farcomeni A. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: The effects of maternal motor function and labor out come. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women. Anesth Analg. 2011; 113: 826–31.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Breen TW, Shapiro T, Glass B, Foster-Payne D, Oriol NE. Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambu latory patient. Anesth Analg. 1993; 77: 919–24.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo C. Automated regular bo luses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with con tinuous infusion. Int Obstet Anesth. 2005; 14: 305–9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Wilson MJA, MacArthur C, Cooper GM, Shennan A. Ambulation in labour and delivery mode: a rando mised controlled trial of high-dose vs mobile epidural analgesia. Anaesthesia. 2009; 64: 266–72.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Martin EJ, Ruth DJ. Caring for the laboring woman. In: Kenedy BB, Ruth DJ, Martin EJ, editors. Intrapartum manamgement modules. 5ed. Philadelphia: Wolter Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2009. p. 134–5.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Chua SM, Sia AT. Automated intermittent epidural boluses improve analgesia induced by intrathecal fentanyl during labour. Can J Anaesth. 2004; 51: 581–5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Fettes PD, Moore CS, Whitesede JB, McLeod GA, Wildsmith JA. Intermittent vs continous administration of epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl for anal gesia during labour. Brit J Anaesth. 2006; 97: 359– 64.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infu sions for labor analgesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anesth Analg. 2013; 116: 133–44.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Ruppen W, Derry S, McQuay H, Moore A. Incidence of epidural hematoma, infection, and neurologic injury in obstetric patients with epidural analge sia/anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2006; 105: 394–9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Beilin Y, Guinn NR, Bernestein HH, Zahn J. Local anaesthetics and mode of delivery: bupivacaine ver sus ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2007; 105: 756–63.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Halpern S. Recent advances in patient –controlled epidural analgesia. Curr Opion Anesth. 2005; 18: 247–51.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Sheng-Huan Ch. et al. Comparison of Patient-contro lled Epidural Analgesia and Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Analgesia. Chang Gung Med J. 2006; 29: 576–82.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo CE. Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a preliminary study on a novel approach of providing pain relief in labour. Singapore Med J. 2006; 47: 951–56.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo C. A comparison of basal infusion with automatic mandatory boluses in par turient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor. Anesth Analg. 2007; 104: 673–38.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Toledo P, Sun J, Grobman WA, Wong CA, Feinglass J, Hasnain-Wynia R. Racial and ethnic disparities in neuraxial labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2012; 114(1): 172–78.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Jiménez-Puente, et al. Ethnic differences in the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia. BMC Health Services Research. 2012; 12: 207–11.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Christiaens, et al. Pain acceptance and personal con trol in pain relief in two maternity care models: a cross-national comparison of Belgium and the Net herlands. BMC Health Services Research. 2010; 10: 268–70.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Tasnim S. Perception about Pain Relief During Nor mal Labour Among Health Care Providers Con ducting Delivery. Med Today. 2010; 22(1): 20–23.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Glance et al. Racial Differences in the Use of Epidural Analgesia for Labor. Anesthesiology. 2007; 106: 19–25.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Bauchat R. J, et al. Prior lumbar discectomy surgery does not alter the efficacy of neuroaxial labour anal gesia. Anesth Analg. 2012; 115: 348–53.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Unintentional Dural puncture with a Touhy Needle Increases Risk of Chronic Headache. Anesth Analg. 2012; 115: 124–32.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Can S. O, Yilmaz A. A, Hasdogan M, Alkaya F, Turhan C. S, Can F. M, Alanoglu Z. Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Cosolidated Standards of repor ting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011; 28: 485–92.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/prilozi-2014-0010 | Journal eISSN: 1857-8985 (formerly 0350-1914) | Journal ISSN: 1857-9345
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 75 - 83
Published on: Dec 1, 2014
Published by: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year
Keywords:
epidural analgesia,
continuous,
patient-controlled,
motor block
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Education,
Education, other

© 2014 Margarita Lovach-Chepujnoska, Jordan Nojkov, Slagjana Joshevska-Jovanovska, Robert Domazetov, published by Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 35 (2014): Issue 2 (October 2014)
Previous article
Next article