Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Hydrodynamic Characteristics of a Propeller in Open Water, Ducted and in a Semi-Tunnel Conditions - a Case Study on Small Waste Collecting Vessel Cover

Hydrodynamic Characteristics of a Propeller in Open Water, Ducted and in a Semi-Tunnel Conditions - a Case Study on Small Waste Collecting Vessel

Open Access
|Mar 2025

References

  1. Deng S, Mi Z. A review on carbon emissions of global shipping. Mar Dev 1(4), 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44312-023-00001-2
  2. Ahmadzadehtalatapeh M, Mousavi M. A review on the drag reduction methods of the ship hulls for improving the hydrodynamic performance. International Journal of Maritime Technology 4, pp. 51-64 2015.
  3. Dudziak J. Teoria okrętu [Theory of ship], Book, Fundacja Promocji Przemysłu Okrętowego i Gospodarki Morskiej [Fundation for Promotion of Ship Industry and Maritime Economy], 2008.
  4. Bøckmann E, Steen S. The effect of a fixed foil on ship propulsion and motions. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’13, pp. 553–561, 2013.
  5. Niklas K, Pruszko H. The retrofitting of ships by applying retracTable bow hydrofoils: A case study. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy 9(4), pp. 767–788, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-023-00289-8
  6. Danişman DB, Gören Ö, Çalişal S. Resistance reduction studies by means of increasing the beam with waterline parabolization. GMO-SHIPMAR, no. 207, pp. 66-79, 2017.
  7. Faltinsen OM, Hydrodynamics of high-speed marine vehicles. Book, Cambridge University Press; 2006.
  8. Collins CA, Clynch JR, Rago TA, Margolina T. Comparison of swath and monohull vessel motion for regional class research vessels. Marine Technology Society Journal 41(2), pp. 56-61 2007. https://doi.org/10.4031/002533207787442231
  9. Nguyen TV, Shimizu N, Kinugawa A, Tai Y, Ikeda Y. Numerical studies on air resistance reduction methods for a large container ship with fully loaded deck containers in oblique winds. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering, MARINE, pp. 1040-1051. 2017.
  10. RAEng. Future ship powering options: Exploring alternative methods of ship propulsion, Tech. Rep. Royal Academy of Engineering, July 2013.
  11. Carlton JS. Marine propellers and propulsion, 3rd edition. Elsevier Ltd.; 2018.
  12. Król P. Hydrodynamic state of art review: Rotor-stator marine propulsor systems design. Polish Maritime Research 28(1), pp. 72 - 82, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2021-0007
  13. Nadery A, Ghassemi H. Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamic performance of the propeller behind the ship with and without wed. Polish Maritime Research 27(4), pp. 50 - 59, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-0065
  14. Voermans A. Experimental determination of hydrodynamic loads on the Wärtsilä preswirl stator EnergoFlow and validation of a prediction methodology for design loads. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’19, 2019.
  15. Zhai SC, Liu DC, Han YB. Numerical study of pressure fluctuation induced by propeller cavitation with pre-shrouded vanes. Chuan Bo Li Xue/Journal of Ship Mechanics 25(10), pp. 1292-1301, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2021.10.002
  16. Inukai Y. A development of a propeller with backward tip raked fin. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Marine Propulsion, SMP’13, 2013.
  17. Druckenbrod M, Wang K, Greitsch L, Heinke H-J, Abdel-Maksoud M. Development of hub caps fitted with PBCF. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’15, 2015.
  18. Ueda N, Oshima A, Unseki T, Fujita S, Takeda S, Kitamura T. The first hybrid CRP-POD driven fast ROPAX ferry in the world. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review 41(6), 2004.
  19. Reichel M, Pruszko H, Czerski K, Necel M. Innovative twin-CRP-pod propulsion system for ultra large container ships - Challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures, PRADS, 2022.
  20. Pivano L. Thrust estimation and control of marine propellers in four-quadrant operations. PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty of Engineering Science & Technology Department of Marine Technology, 2008.
  21. Smogeli ON, Control of marine propellers. PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty of Engineering Science & Technology Department of Marine Technology, 2006.
  22. Pivano L, Johansen TA, Smogeli ØN. A four-quadrant thrust estimation scheme for marine propellers: Theory and experiments. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 17(1), pp. 215-226, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2008.922602
  23. Fossen TI. Marine control system-guidance, navigation and control of ships, rigs and underwater vehicles. Marine Cybernetics; Trondheim, Norway, 2002.
  24. Van Lammeren WPA, van Manen JD, Oosterveld MWC. The Wageningen B-screw series. Transactions SNAME 77, pp. 269-317, 1969.
  25. Oosterveld MWC. Wake adapted ducted propellers. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1970.
  26. Faller W, Roddy RF, Hess DE. Neural network predictions of the 4-quadrant Wageningen propeller series. Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division, Hydromechanics Department Report NSWCCD‐50‐TR‐2006/004, April 2006.
  27. Sunarsih, Z. Mohd, and I. Nur. Four quadrant thrust generation model for ship manoeuvring simulation. Aust. J. Basic & Appl. Sci. 10(11), pp. 243–248, 2016.
  28. Tran M, Binns J, Chai S, Forrest AL, Nguyen H. A practical approach to the dynamic modelling of an underwater vehicle propeller in all four quadrants of operation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment 233(1), pp. 333-344, 2019.
  29. Li D, Wang Z, Chi H. Chebyshev fitting way and error analysis for propeller atlas across four quadrants. J. Marine. Sci. Appl. 1(1), pp. 52–59, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02921417
  30. Häusler J, Saccon A, Hauser J, Pascoal AM, Aguiar AP. A novel four-quadrant propeller model. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’15, 2015.
  31. Bruce EP, Gearhart WS, Ross JR, Treaster AL. The design of pumpjets for hydrodynamic propulsion. Conference paper, Fluid Mech., Acoustics, and Design of Turbomachinery, Pt. 2, 1974.
  32. Xi P, Meng L, Huang Z, Wang Z. Controllable pitch propeller comparison of different speed and pitch matches at noncavitation condition. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1985(1):012066, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1985/1/012066
  33. Burak Şamşul M, Görener N. The usage of propeller tunnels for higher efficiency and lower vibration. In Proceedings of the 1st International Meeting - Propeller Noise & Vibration, 2014. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3061.4724
  34. Bhattacharyya A, Krasilnikov V. Scale effects on a 4-bladed propeller operating in ducts of different design in open water. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’15, 2015.
  35. Falcao de Campos JAC. On the calculation of ducted propeller performance in axisymmetric flows. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1983.
  36. Blount DL. Design of propeller tunnels of high-speed craft. Marine Technology and SNAME News 34(4), pp. 276-292, 1997. https://doi.org/10.5957/mt1.1997.34.4.276
  37. Burunsuz S, Özden MC, Özden A, Helvacıoğlu İH. Four quadrant thrust and torque prediction of INSEAN E-1619 generic submarine propeller for submarine maneuvering simulations. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, 2017.
  38. Gaggero S, Rizzo CM, Tani G, Viviani M. EFD and CFD design and analysis of a propeller in decelerating duct. International Journal of Rotating Machinery 2012 (2), pp. 1-15, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/823831
  39. Ponkratov D, Zegos C. Validation of ship scale CFD self-propulsion simulation by the direct comparison with sea trials results. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’15, 2015.
  40. ITTC. Practical guidelines for ship CFD applications - 7.5-03-02-03. ITTC - Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, pp. 1-18, 2011.
  41. ITTC. Practical guidelines for ship resistance CFD - 7.5-03-02-04. ITTC - Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, pp. 1-9, 2014.
  42. Siemens PLM software. User Guide Star CCM+ v12.04. 2017.
  43. Nouroozi H, Zeraatgar H. Propeller hydrodynamic characteristics in oblique flow by unsteady ranse solver. Polish Maritime Research 27(1), pp. 6-17, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-0001
  44. Vier-Kwadrant Vrijvarende-Schroef-Karakterstieken Voor B-Serie Schroeven. Fourier-Reeks Ontwikkeling en Operationeel Gebruik [Four-quadrant open water propeller characteristics for B-series propellers. Fourier series development and operational use]. MARIN Report 60482-1- MS, 1984 [Limited Availability].
  45. Oosterveld MWC, van Oossanen P. Recent developments in marine propeller hydrodynamics. In International Jubilee Meeting: 40th Anniversary of the Netherlands Ship Model Basin, NSMB Publication No. 433, 1972.
  46. ITTC. Uncertainty analysis in CFD verification and validation, methodology and procedures - 7.5-0.3-0.1-0.1. ITTC -Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, 2024.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2025-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2083-7429 | Journal ISSN: 1233-2585
Language: English
Page range: 19 - 30
Published on: Mar 5, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Piotr Pruszko, Hanna Pruszko, Maciej Reichel, published by Gdansk University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.