References
- Millward A.The effect of hull separation and restricted water depth on catamaran resistance. Trans. R. Inst. Nav. Archit. 134, 341-349, 1992.
- Zaraphonitis G, Spanos D, Papanikolaou A. Numerical and experimental study on the wave resistance of fast displacement asymmetric catamarans. Proc. 2nd Int. Euro Conference HIPER, vol. 1, 2001.
- Moraes H B, Vasconcellos J M, Latite RG. Wave resistance for high-speed catamarans. Ocean Eng. 31(17-18), 2253-2282, 2004. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng 2004.03.012.
- Lee S H, Lee Y G, Kin S H. On the development of a small catamaran boat. Ocean Eng. 34(14-15), 2061-2073, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.
- Zaghi S, Broglia R, Di Mascio A. Experimental and numerical investigations on fast catamarans interference effects. J. Hydrodyn. 22(5), 545-549, 2010. doi:10.1016/ S1001-6058(09)60250-X.
- Zaghi S, Broglia R, Di Mascio A. Analysis of the interference effects for high-speed catamarans by model tests and numerical simulations. Ocean Eng. 38(17-18), 2110-2122, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng 2011.09.037.
- Farkas A, Degiuli N, Martić I. Numerical investigation into the interaction of resistance components for a series 60 catamaran. Ocean Eng. 146(August), 151-169, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng 2017.09.043.
- Lin C T, Lin T, Lin C W, Hsieh Y W, Lu L, Hsin C Y. Investigation of the seakeeping performance of twin hull vessels by different computational methods. 10th International Workshop on Ship and Marine Hydrodynamics Keelung. Taiwan, November 5th-8th, 2017.
- Fitriadhy A, Adam N, Amalina N, Azmi S.A. Seakeeping prediction of deep-V high-speed catamaran using computational fluid dynamics approach. SINERGI 22(3), 139-148, 2018. doi:10.22441/sinergi.2018.3.001.
- Chen X, Zhu R., Chuan Song Y, Lan, Fan J. An investigation on HOBEM in evaluating ship wave of high-speed catamaran ship. J. Hydrodyn. 31(3), 531-541, 2019. doi:10.1007/s42241-018-0092-8.
- Honaryar A, Ghiasi M, Liu P, Honaryar A. A new phenomenon in interference effect on catamaran dynamic response. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 190, 106041, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106041.
- Dogrul A, Kahramanoglu E, Cakıcı F. Numerical prediction of interference factor in motions and added resistance for Delft catamaran 372. Ocean Engineering 223, 108687, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108687.
- Farkas A, Degiuli N, Tomljenović I, Martić I. Numerical investigation of interference effects for the Delft 372 catamaran. In: Sustainable development and innovations in marine technologies (pp. 67-74). CRC Press. 2022. doi:10.1177/14750902231197886.
- Windyandari A, Sugeng S, Sulaiman, Ridwan M, Kurniawan Yusim A. Seakeeping behavior of hexagonal catamaran hull form as an alternative geometry design of flat-side hull vessel. Journal of Applied Engineering Science 21(4), 1016-1030, 2023. doi:10.5937/jaes0-41412.
- Moghaddas A, Zeraatgar H. Investigation of the static trim angle effects on the hydrodynamic performances of a semi-planing catamaran in calm water and waves. Scientia Iranica (under publication).
- ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines. Practical guidelines for ship CFD application. 7.5-03-02-03. Revision 01. 2011.
- Celik I, Ghia U, Roache P, Freitas C, Coleman H, Raad P. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J. Fluids Eng. 130(7), 078001-078004, 2008. DOI:10.1115/1.2960953.
- ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines. Practical guidelines for ship CFD application. 7.5-03-02-03. Revision 01. 2011.
- ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines. Seakeeping Experiments. 7.5-02-07-02.1. Revision 04. 2014.
- ISO 2631. Mechanical vibration and shock-evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration. Part 1: General Requirements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1997.