Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Influence of Material Thickness on the Ductile Fracture of Steel Plates for Shipbuilding Cover

Influence of Material Thickness on the Ductile Fracture of Steel Plates for Shipbuilding

Polish Maritime Research
Volume 29 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)
By:
Open Access
|Oct 2022

References

  1. 1. A. Griffith, ‘The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids’, Philosophical Transactions, vol. 221, pp. 163–198, 1920.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1921.0006" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1098/rsta.1921.0006</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. 2. A. Wells, ‘Application of fracture mechanics at and beyond general yield, Report No. M13/63’, British Welding Journal, pp. 563–590, 1963.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. 3. J. R. Rice, ‘A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks’, J Appl Mech, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 379–386, Jun. 1968, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3601206." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1115/1.3601206.</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. 4. W. Dahl and P. Langenberg, ‘Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials’, in Encyclopaedia of Materials: Science and Technology (Second Edition), 2001, pp. 3336–3340.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043152-6/00596-9" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/B0-08-043152-6/00596-9</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. 5. DNV, RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION, Ships, Part 2 Materials and welding, Chapter 1 General requirements for materials and fabrication. DNV AS, 2022.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. 6. Standards Norway, NORSOK STANDARD M-101, Structural steel fabrication, 5th ed. Lysaker, 2011.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. 7. DNV, DNV OFFSHORE STANDARDS, DNV-OS-B101, Metallic materials. DNV AV, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://rules.dnv.com/docs/pdf/DNV/OS/2021-07/DNVOS-B101.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 8. Polski Rejestr Statków, Rules For Classification and Construction on sea-going ships, Part IX, Materials and Welding. Gdańsk: PRS, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.prs.pl/uploads/mor_p9.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. 9. BSI, BS 7448-1:1991 - Fracture mechanics toughness tests. Method for determination of KIc, critical CTOD and critical J values of metallic materials. London: BSI, 1991.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. 10. ASTM International, ‘ASTM E1820 - 18a Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness’, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. 11. ISO, ISO 12135:2016 Metallic materials — Unified method of test for the determination of quasistatic fracture toughness. Geneva, 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. 12. P. L. Moore and A. M. Crintea, ‘Single edge notched tension (SENT) testing at low temperatures’, Proceedings of the Biennial International Pipeline Conference, IPC, vol. 3, 2016, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC201664021." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1115/IPC201664021.</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. 13. A. Neimitz, Mechanika Pękania. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 1998.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. 14. T. Kawabata, T. Tagawa, T. Sakimoto, Y. Kayamori, M. Ohata, Y. Yamashita, E. Tamura, H. Yoshinari, S. Aihara, F. Minami, H. Mimura, Y. Hagihara, ‘Proposal for a new CTOD calculation formula’, Eng Fract Mech, vol. 159, pp. 16–34, 2016, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.019." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.019.</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. 15. W. L. Khor, ‘A CTOD equation based on the rigid rotational factor with the consideration of crack tip blunting due to strain hardening for SEN(B)’, Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1622–1630, Jul. 2019, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13005." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/ffe.13005.</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. 16. F. C. Campbell, ‘Fatigue and Fracture: Understanding the Basics’. 2012.<a href="https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.tb.ffub.9781627083034" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.31399/asm.tb.ffub.9781627083034</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. 17. J. Morrison and J. P. Gough, ‘Specimen size and orientation effects on the toughness of steel weldments’, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 270–277, 1989, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3226466." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1115/1.3226466.</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. 18. M. Palombo, S. Sandon, and M. de Marco, ‘An Evaluation of Size Effect in CTOD-SENB Fracture Toughness Tests’, Procedia Eng, vol. 109, pp. 55–64, 2015, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.207." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.207.</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. 19. J. Kowalski and J. Kozak, ‘The Effect of Notch Depth on CTOD Values in Fracture Tests of Structural Steel Elements’, Polish Maritime Research, vol. 25, no. 2, 2018, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2018-0058." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/pomr-2018-0058.</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. 20. J. Kowalski, ‘Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Specimen Geometry Effect on the CTOD Value for VL-E36 Shipbuilding Steel’, Polish Maritime Research, vol. 28, no. 3, 2021, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2021-0038." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/pomr-2021-0038.</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. 21. J. Kowalski and J. Kozak, ‘Numerical Model of Plastic Destruction of Thick Steel Structural Elements’, Polish Maritime Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 78–84, 2018, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2018-0057." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/pomr-2018-0057.</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2022-0036 | Journal eISSN: 2083-7429 | Journal ISSN: 1233-2585
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 160 - 166
Published on: Oct 29, 2022
Published by: Gdansk University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
ductility,
toughness,
plasticity,
CTOD
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other,
Geosciences,
Atmospheric science and climatology,
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2022 Jakub Kowalski, Janusz Kozak, published by Gdansk University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 29 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)Next article