Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Influence of Selected Strain-Based Failure Criteria on Ship Structure Damage Resulting from a Collision with an Offshore Wind Turbine Monopile Cover

The Influence of Selected Strain-Based Failure Criteria on Ship Structure Damage Resulting from a Collision with an Offshore Wind Turbine Monopile

Polish Maritime Research
Volume 28 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)
By:
Open Access
|Jan 2022

References

  1. 1. L. Ramirez, D. Fraile, and G. Brindley, “Offshore wind in Europe: Key trends and statistics 2019,” 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. 2. L. Ramirez, D. Fraile, and G. Brindley, “Offshore wind in Europe: Key trends and statistics 2020,” 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. 3. EMSA, “Marine Casualties and Incidents PRELIMINARY ANNUAL OVERVIEW OF MARINE CASUALTIES AND INCIDENTS 2014-2020,” no. April, 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. 4. L. Junlai, X. Yonghe, W. Weiguo, and Z. Chi, “Analysis of the Dynamic Response of Offshore Floating Wind Power Platforms in Waves,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 17–25, 2020. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-006210.2478/pomr-2020-0062" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/pomr-2020-006210.2478/pomr-2020-0062</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. 5. A. Karczewski and Ł. Piątek, “The influence of the cuboid float’s parameters on the stability of a floating building,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 27, no. 107, pp. 16–21, 2020. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-004210.2478/pomr-2020-0042" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/pomr-2020-004210.2478/pomr-2020-0042</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. 6. K. Niklas and A. Karczewski, “Determination of seakeeping performance for a case study vessel by the strip theory method,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 27, no. 108, pp. 4–16, 2020. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-006110.2478/pomr-2020-0061" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/pomr-2020-006110.2478/pomr-2020-0061</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. 7. F. Wang and N. Chen, “Dynamic response analysis of drill pipe considering horizontal movement of platform during installation of subsea production tree,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 22–30, 2020. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-004310.2478/pomr-2020-0043" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/pomr-2020-004310.2478/pomr-2020-0043</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 8. J.T. Wu, J.H. Chen, C.Y. Hsin, and F.C. Chiu, “Dynamics of the FKT System with Different Mooring Lines,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2019. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2019-000310.2478/pomr-2019-0003" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/pomr-2019-000310.2478/pomr-2019-0003</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. 9. E. Mieloszyk, M. Abramski, and A. Milewska, “CFGFRPT Piles with a Circular Cross-Section and their Application in Offshore Structures,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 128–137, 2019. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2019-005310.2478/pomr-2019-0053" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/pomr-2019-005310.2478/pomr-2019-0053</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. 10. W. Litwin, W. Leśniewski, D. Piątek, and K. Niklas, “Experimental Research on the Energy Efficiency of a Parallel Hybrid Drive for an Inland Ship,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 1675, 2019.<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091675" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/en12091675</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. 11. V.S. Blintsov, K.S. Trunin, and W. Tarełko, “Determination of Additional Tension in Towed Streamer Cable Triggered by Collision with Underwater Moving Object,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 58–68, 2020. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-002710.2478/pomr-2020-0027" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/pomr-2020-002710.2478/pomr-2020-0027</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. 12. K. Niklas and H. Pruszko, “Full scale CFD seakeeping simulations for case study ship redesigned from V-shaped bulbous bow to X-bow hull form,” Appl. Ocean Res., vol. 89, pp. 188–201, Aug. 2019.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.05.011" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.apor.2019.05.011</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. 13. F. Biehl, “Collision Safety Analysis of Offshore Wind Turbines,” 4th LSDYNA Eur. Conf., pp. 27–34, 2005.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. 14. K. Niklas, “Strength analysis of a large-size supporting structure for an offshore wind turbine,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 24, pp. 156–165, 2017. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2017-003410.1515/pomr-2017-0034" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/pomr-2017-003410.1515/pomr-2017-0034</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. 15. P. Dymarski, “Design of Jack-Up Platform for 6 MW Wind Turbine: Parametric Analysis Based Dimensioning of Platform Legs,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 183–197, 2019. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2019-003810.2478/pomr-2019-0038" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/pomr-2019-003810.2478/pomr-2019-0038</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. 16. B. Rozmarynowski, “Spectral Dynamic Analysis of A Stationary Jack-Up Platform,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 1, 2019. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2019-000510.2478/pomr-2019-0005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/pomr-2019-000510.2478/pomr-2019-0005</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. 17. WindEurope, “Offshore wind in Europe - Key trends and statistics 2020,” WindEurope, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 14–17, 2021.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-0846(02)80021-X" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/S1471-0846(02)80021-X</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. 18. N. Ren and J. Ou, “Dynamic numerical simulation for ship-OWT collision,” Proc. 2009 8th Int. Conf. Reliab. Maintainab. Safety, ICRMS 2009, no. July, pp. 1003–1007, 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. 19. E. Homayoun, H. Ghassemi, and H. Ghafari, “Power Performance of the Combined Monopile Wind Turbine and Floating Buoy with Heave-Type Wave Energy Converter,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 107–114, 2019. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2019-005110.2478/pomr-2019-0051" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/pomr-2019-005110.2478/pomr-2019-0051</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. 20. J.R.A. Tomporowski, A. Al-Zubiedy, J. Flizikowski, W. Kruszelnicka, P. Bałdowska-Witos, “Analysis of the Project of innovative floating turbine,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 121–183, 2020. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2019-007410.2478/pomr-2019-0074" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/pomr-2019-007410.2478/pomr-2019-0074</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. 21. A. Bela, L. Buldgen, P. Rigo, and H. Le Sourne, “Numerical crashworthiness analysis of an offshore wind turbine monopile impacted by a ship,” Anal. Des. Mar. Struct. - Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Mar. Struct. MARSTRUCT 2015, no. 2013, pp. 661–669, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. 22. A. Bela, H. Le Sourne, L. Buldgen, and P. Rigo, “Ship collision analysis on offshore wind turbine monopile foundations,” Mar. Struct., vol. 51, pp. 220–241, 2017.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.10.009" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.10.009</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. 23. H. Jia, S. Qin, R. Wang, Y. Xue, D. Fu, and A. Wang, “Ship collision impact on the structural load of an offshore wind turbine,” Glob. Energy Interconnect., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2020.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloei.2020.03.009" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.gloei.2020.03.009</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. 24. E. Lehmann and J. Peschmann, “Energy absorption by the steel structure of ships in the event of collisions,” Mar. Struct., vol. 15, no. 4–5, pp. 429–441, 2002.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8339(02)00011-4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/S0951-8339(02)00011-4</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. 25. K. Niklas and J. Kozak, “Experimental investigation of Steel-Concrete-Polymer composite barrier for the ship internal tank construction,” Ocean Eng., vol. 111, pp. 449–460, 2016.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.11.030" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.11.030</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. 26. Ringsberg, J., Amdahl, J., Chen, B., Cho, S.-R., Ehlers, S., Hu, Z., Kubiczek, J., Kõrgesaar, M., Liu, B., Marinatos, J., Niklas, K., Parunov, J., Quinton, B., Rudan, S., Samuelides, M., Soares, C., Tabri, K., Villavicencio, R., Yamada, Y., Yu, Z., & Zhang, S., “MARSTRUCT benchmark study on nonlinear FE simulation of an experiment of an indenter impact with a ship side-shell structure,” Mar. Struct., vol. 59, pp. 142–157, 2018.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.01.010" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.01.010</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. 27. A. AbuBakar and R.S. Dow, “The impact analysis characteristics of a ship’s bow during collisions,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 100, no. August 2018, pp. 492–511, 2019.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.02.050" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.02.050</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. 28. K. Niklas, “Numerical calculations of behaviour of ship double-bottom structure during grounding,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 15, no. SUPPL. 1, 2008.<a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/v10012-007-0073-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/v10012-007-0073-2</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. 29. M.A.G. Calle and M. Alves, “A review-analysis on material failure modelling in ship collision,” Ocean Eng., vol. 106, pp. 20–38, 2015.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.032" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.032</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. 30. O. Kitamura, “FEM approach to the simulation of collision and grounding damage,” Mar. Struct., vol. 15, no. 4–5, pp. 403–428, 2002.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8339(02)00010-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/S0951-8339(02)00010-2</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. 31. DNVGL, “DNV-RP-C208: Determination of Structural Capacity by Non-linear FE analysis Methods,” 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. 32. J.L. Martinez, J.C.R. Cyrino, and M.A. Vaz, “FPSO collision local damage and ultimate longitudinal bending strength analyses,” Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2020.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78255952" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1590/1679-78255952</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. 33. G. Wang, K. Arita, and D. Liu, “Behavior of a double hull in a variety of stranding or collision scenarios,” Mar. Struct., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 147–187, 2000.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8339(00)00036-8" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/S0951-8339(00)00036-8</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. 34. S. Yagi, H. Kumamoto, O. Muragishi, Y. Takaoka, and T. Shimoda, “A study on collision buffer characteristic of sharp entrance angle bow structure,” Mar. Struct., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 12–23, 2009.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2008.06.006" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.marstruc.2008.06.006</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. 35. S. Ehlers, “The influence of the material relation on the accuracy of collision simulations,” Mar. Struct., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 462–474, 2010.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2010.12.002" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.marstruc.2010.12.002</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. 36. S. Ehlers, J. Broekhuijsen, H.S. Alsos, F. Biehl, and K. Tabri, “Simulating the collision response of ship side structures: A failure criteria benchmark study,” Int. Shipbuild. Prog., vol. 55, no. 1–2, pp. 127–144, 2008.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. 37. Standards Norway, “NORSOK Standard - Design of steel structure N-004, Rev.3,” 2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. 38. DNVGL, “DNVGL-RP-C204 - Design against Accidental Loads,” 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. 39. M. Scharrer, L. Zhang, and E.D. Egge, “Final report MTK0614, Collision calculations in naval design systems, Report Nr. ESS 2002.183,” Hamburg, 2002.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. 40. DNVGL, “DNV-RP-C208: Determination of Structural Capacity by Non-linear FE analysis Methods,” 2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. 41. S. Zhang, “The mechanics of ship collisions,” Technical University of Danemark, 1999.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. 42. Verband Deutscher Ingenieure, “Systematic calculation of high duty bolted joints joints with one cylindrical bolt,” Berlin, 2003.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. 43. O. Ozgur, “Numerical Assessment of FPSO Platform Behaviour in Ship Collision,” Trans. Marit. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, 2020.<a href="https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v09.n02.003" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.7225/toms.v09.n02.003</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. 44. T. S. Bøe, “Analysis and Design of Stiffened Columns in Offshore Floating Platforms Subjected to Supply Vessel Impacts,” Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. 45. M.P. Mujeeb-Ahmed, S.T. Ince, and J.K. Paik, “Computational models for the structural crashworthiness analysis of a fixed-type offshore platform in collisions with an offshore supply vessel,” Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 154, no. June, p. 106868, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. 46. Livermore Software Technology, “LS-DYNA - KEYWORD USER’S MANUAL, VOLUME II Material Models,” 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. 47. Y.G. Ko, S.J. Kim, J.M. Sohn, and J.K. Paik, “A practical method to determine the dynamic fracture strain for the nonlinear finite element analysis of structural crashworthiness in ship–ship collisions,” Ships Offshore Struct., vol. 13, no. 4, 2018.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2017.1405584" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/17445302.2017.1405584</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. 48. J. Travanca and H. Hao, “Energy dissipation in high-energy ship-offshore jacket platform collisions,” Mar. Struct., vol. 40, pp. 1–37, 2015.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2014.10.008" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.marstruc.2014.10.008</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2021-0048 | Journal eISSN: 2083-7429 | Journal ISSN: 1233-2585
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 42 - 52
Published on: Jan 1, 2022
Published by: Gdansk University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Ship,
collision,
monopile,
failure,
crashworthiness
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other,
Geosciences,
Atmospheric science and climatology,
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2022 Karol Niklas, Alicja Bera, published by Gdansk University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 28 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)Next article