References
- 1. Revised MARPOL Annex VI: Regulations for the prevention of air pollution from ships and NOx technical code London: IMO Marine Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC), IMO, 2008
- 2. Z. Yang, Q. Tan, and P. Geng, ‘Combustion and emissions investigation on low-speed two-stroke marine diesel engine with low sulpur diesel fuel’, Polish Maritime Research. 2019, 26(1), 153-161.
- 3. L. Yang, Y. Cai, Y. Wei, and S. Huang, ‘Choice of technology for emission control in port areas: A supply chain perspective’, Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019, 240, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118105.10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118105
- 4. W. Zeńczak and A. K. Gromadzińska, ‘Preliminary analysis of the use of solid biofuels in a ship’s power system’, Polish Maritime Research. 2020, 27(4), 67-79.
- 5. S.-I. Park, S.-K. Kim, and J. K. Paik Freng, ‘Safety-zone layout design for a floating LNG-Fueled power plant in bunkering process’, Ocean Engineering. 2020, 196, DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106774.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106774
- 6. J. B. Guinée et al., ‘Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future’, Environmental Science & Technology. 2011, 45(1), 90.
- 7. F. Zheng, F. Gu, W. Zhang, and J. Guo, ‘Is bicycle sharing an environmental practice? Evidence from a life cycle assessment based on behavioural surveys’, Sustainability. 2019, 11(6), DOI: 10.3390/su11061550.10.3390/su11061550
- 8. A. Tomporowski, I. Piasecka, J. Flizikowski, R. Kasner, and K. Bieliński, ‘Comparison analysis of blade life cycles of land-based and offshore wind power plants’, Polish Maritime Research. 2018, 25(97), 225-233, DOI: 10.2478/pomr-2018-0046.10.2478/pomr-2018-0046
- 9. X. Wu et al., ‘Comparative life cycle assessment and economic analysis of typical flue-gas cleaning processes of coal-fired power plants in China’, Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017, 142, 3236-3242, DOI: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2016.10.146.
- 10. T. A. S. Lopes, L. M. Queiroz, E. A. Torres, and A. Kiperstok, ‘Low complexity waste-water treatment process in developing countries: A LCA approach to evaluate environmental gains’, Sci Total Environ. 2020, 720, 137593, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137593.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13759332146399
- 11. J. Ling-Chin and A. P. Roskilly, ‘A comparative life cycle assessment of marine power systems’, Energy Conversion & Management. 2016, 127, 477-493.
- 12. S. S. Hwang et al., ‘Life cycle assessment of alternative ship fuels for coastal ferry operating in Republic of Korea’, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2020, 8(9), DOI: 10.3390/jmse8090660.10.3390/jmse8090660
- 13. ISO 14041: Environmental management — life cycle assessment — goal and scope definition — inventory analysis, H. J. Klüppel, 1998.
- 14. ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessment, S. O. Ryding, 1999.
- 15. ISO 14043: Environmental management · life cycle assessment · life cycle interpretation, H. Lecouls, 1999.
- 16. H. E. Lindstad, C. F. Rehn, and G. S. Eskeland, ‘Sulphur abatement globally in maritime shipping’, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2017, 57, 303-313, DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.09.028.10.1016/j.trd.2017.09.028
- 17. S. R. Sharvini, Z. Z. Noor, C. S. Chong, L. C. Stringer, and D. Glew, ‘Energy generation from palm oil mill effluent: A life cycle assessment of two biogas technologies’, Energy. 2020, 191, 116513.1-116513.8, DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116513.10.1016/j.energy.2019.116513
- 18. Lamas et al., ‘Numerical model of SO2 scrubbing with seawater applied to marine engines’, Polish Maritime Research. 2016, 23(90), 42-4710.1515/pomr-2016-0019
- 19. D. Flagiello, A. Erto, A. Lancia, and F. Di Natale, ‘Experimental and modelling analysis of seawater scrubbers for sulphur dioxide removal from flue-gas’, Fuel. 2018, 214, 254-263, DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.098.10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.098
- 20. A. Pajdak, ‘The effect of structure modification of sodium compounds on the SO2 and HCl removal efficiency from fumes in the conditions of circulating fluidised bed’, Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly. 2017, 31(3), 261-273, DOI: 10.15255/cabeq.2015.2305.10.15255/CABEQ.2015.2305
- 21. Y. Zhu et al., ‘Shipboard trials of magnesium-based exhaust gas cleaning system’, Ocean Engineering. 2016, 128, 124-131, DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.10.004.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.10.004
- 22. Q. Liu, M. Sun, T. Zhang, and Y. Zhu, ‘Enhanced oxidation of MgSO3 during desulphurisation by a novel spray method in magnesium-based seawater exhaust gas clean system’, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. 2017, 231(4), 871-876, DOI: 10.1177/1475090216687437.10.1177/1475090216687437
- 23. M. Goedkoop, R. Heijungs, M. Huijbregts, A. De Schryver, J. Struijs, and R. Van Zelm, (2009), ‘ReCiPe 2008 - A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level’, Report I: Characterisation. Vol. 1. Ministerie van VROM. Den Haag|
- 24. M. A. J. Huijbregts et al., ‘ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level’, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2016, 22(2), 138-147, DOI: 10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y.10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y
- 25. Y. H. Dong and S. T. Ng, ‘Comparing the midpoint and endpoint approaches based on ReCiPe—a study of commercial buildings in Hong Kong’, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2014, 19(7), 1409-1423, DOI: 10.1007/s11367-014-0743-0.10.1007/s11367-014-0743-0
- 26. W. Shi et al., ‘Environmental effect of current desulfphurisation technology on fly dust emission in China’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017, 72, 1-9, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.033.10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.033