Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Study of a New Type of Flettner Rotor in Merchant Ships Cover

Study of a New Type of Flettner Rotor in Merchant Ships

Open Access
|Apr 2021

References

  1. 1. L. Zhen, Y. W. Wu, S. A. Wang, et al. ‘Green technology adoption for fleet deployment in a shipping network’. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 139 (2020), 388-410.
  2. 2. A. Halff, L. Younes, T. Boersma. ‘The likely implications of the new IMO standards on the shipping industry’. Energy Policy, 126 (2019), 277–286.
  3. 3. Y. P. Yuan, J. X. Wang, X. P. Yan, et al. ‘A review of multi-energy hybrid power system for ships’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 132 (2020), 110081.10.1016/j.rser.2020.110081
  4. 4. P. Cheng, N. Liang, R. Y. Li, et al. ‘Analysis of Influence of Ship Roll on Ship Power System with Renewable Energy’. Energies 2020, 13, 1, doi:10.3390/en13010001.10.3390/en13010001
  5. 5. Y. Y. Xie, W. Q. Guo, Q. W. Wu, et al. ‘Robust MPC-based bidding strategy for wind storage systems in real-time energy and regulation markets’. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 124 (2021), 106361.10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106361
  6. 6. Y. Wang. ‘The working principle and practical application of rotor sail’. Shanghai Energy Conservation, 2018 (11), doi:10.13770/j.cnki.issn2095-705x.2018.11.010.
  7. 7. L. Talluri, D.K. Nalianda, E. Giuliani. ‘Techno economic and environmental assessment of Flettner rotors for marine propulsion’. Ocean Engineering, 154 (2018), 1-15.
  8. 8. K. Roncin, M. Behrel, P. Iachkine, et al. ‘Benchmark Sea Trials on a 6-Meter Boat Powered by Kite’. Applied Science, 2020, 10, 6148; doi:10.3390/app10186148.10.3390/app10186148
  9. 9. R. H. Lu and J. W. Ringsberg. ‘Ship energy performance study of three windassisted ship propulsion technologies including a parametric study of the Flettner rotor technology’. Ships and Offshore Structures, doi: 10.1080/17445302.2019.1612544.10.1080/17445302.2019.1612544
  10. 10. G. Bordogna, S. Muggiasca, S. Giappino, et al. ‘Experiments on a Flettner rotor at critical and supercritical Reynolds numbers’. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 188 (2019), 19-29.
  11. 11. A. De Marco, S. Mancini, C. Pensa, et al. ‘Flettner Rotor Concept for Marine Applications: A Systematic Study’. International Journal of Rotating Machinery, doi:10.1155/2016/3458750.10.1155/2016/3458750
  12. 12. A. De Marco, S. Mancini, C. Pensa, et al. ‘Marine application of Flettner rotors: numerical study on a systematic variation of geometric factor by DOE approach,’ in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering (MARINE’15), Rome, Italy, June 2015.
  13. 13. A. Thom. ‘Effects of discs on the air forces on a rotating cylinder,’ Reports & Memoranda 1623, Aerospace Research Council, 1934.
  14. 14. G. Bordogna, S. Muggiasca, S. Giappino, et al. ‘The effects of the aerodynamic interaction on the performance of two Flettner rotors’. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104024.10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104024
  15. 15. S.J. Karabelas, B.C. Koumroglou, C.D. Argyropoulos, et al. ‘High Reynolds number turbulent flow past a rotating cylinder’. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36 (2012), 379-398.
  16. 16. T. Craft, N. Johnson, B. Launder. ‘Back to the Future? A Re-examination of the Aerodynamics of Flettner-Thom Rotors for Maritime Propulsion’. Flow Turbulence Combust, doi: 10.1007/s10494-013-9486-4.10.1007/s10494-013-9486-4
  17. 17. M. Traut, P. Gilbert, C. Walsh, et al. ‘Propulsive power contribution of a kite and a Flettner rotor on selected shipping routes’. Applied Energy, 113 (2014), 362-372.
  18. 18. S. Salter, G. Sortino, J. Latham. ‘Sea-going hardware for the cloud albedo method of reversing global warming’. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, (2008), 366, 3989-4006, doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0136.10.1098/rsta.2008.013618757273
  19. 19. C. Badalamenti, S. A. Prince. ‘Effects of endplates on a rotating cylinder in crossflow,’ in Proceedings of the 26th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, August 2008.10.2514/6.2008-7063
  20. 20. F. Tillig, J. W. Ringsberg, et al. ‘Design, operation and analysis of wind-assisted cargo ships’. Ocean Engineering, 211 (2020), 107603.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107603
  21. 21. X. Y. Lu. ‘Study on aerodynamic Performance of Vertical Magnus Wind Turbine’. University of Xiang Tan, May 2019.
  22. 22. A. Sedaghat, I. Samani, M. Ahmadi-Baloutaki, et al. ‘Computational study on novel circulating aerofoils for use in Magnus wind turbine blades’. Energy, 91 (2015), 393-403.
  23. 23. A. Sedaghat. ‘Magnus type wind turbines: Prospectus and challenges in design and modelling’. Renewable Energy, 62 (2014), 619-628.10.1016/j.renene.2013.08.029
  24. 24. J. Seifert. ‘A review of the Magnus effect in aeronautics’. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 55 (2012), 17-45.10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.07.001
  25. 25. X. Y. Liu, Y. X. Wang, J. J. Liang et al. ‘CFD Analysis of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Ship’s Wind-Assisted Rotor Sail. Navigation of China’, doi: 1000-4653 (2019) 04-0046-05.
  26. 26. G. Dong, P. T. Lee. ‘Environmental effects of emission control areas and reduced speed zones on container ship operation’. Journal of Cleaner Production, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122582.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122582
  27. 27. N. R. Ammar, I. S. Seddiek. ‘Enhancing energy efficiency for new generations of containerized shipping’. Ocean Engineering, 215 (2020), 107887.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107887
  28. 28. D. Wang, P. L.-F. Liu. ‘An ISPH with k–ε closure for simulating turbulence under solitary waves’. Coastal Engineering, 157 (2020), 103657.10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103657
  29. 29. B. J. Guo, S. Steen. ‘Comparison of numerical methods for wave generation by VOF-based numerical wave tank’. Proceedings of the ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. OMAE 2011-49777.
  30. 30. D. Moreira, N. Mathias, T. Morais. ‘Dual flapping foil system for propulsion and harnessing wave energy: A 2D parametric study for unaligned foil configurations’. Ocean Engineering, 215 (2020), 107875.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107875
  31. 31. M. Terziev, T. Tezdogan, A. Incecik. ‘Modelling the hydrodynamic effect of abrupt water depth changes on a ship travelling in restricted waters using CFD’. Ships and Offshore Structures, doi: 10.1080/17445302.2020.1816731.10.1080/17445302.2020.1816731
  32. 32. I. Razgallah, S. Kaidi, H. Smaoui, et al. ‘The impact of free surface modelling on hydrodynamic forces for ship navigating in inland waterways: water depth, drift angle, and ship speed effect’. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0566-y.10.1007/s00773-018-0566-y
  33. 33. D. J. Wang, K. Liu, P. Huo, et al. ‘Motions of an unmanned catamaran ship with fixed tandem hydrofoils in regular head waves’. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0583-x.10.1007/s00773-018-0583-x
  34. 34. B. S. Zhang, B. W. Song, Z. Y. Mao, et al. ‘Hydrokinetic energy harnessing by spring-mounted oscillators in FIM with different cross sections: From triangle to circle’. Energy, 189 (2019), 116249.10.1016/j.energy.2019.116249
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2021-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2083-7429 | Journal ISSN: 1233-2585
Language: English
Page range: 28 - 41
Published on: Apr 30, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Boyang Li, Rui Zhang, Yajing Li, Baoshou Zhang, Chao Guo, published by Gdansk University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.