Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Prediction of Hull Gesture and Flow Around Ship Based on Taylor Expansion Boundary Element Method Cover

The Prediction of Hull Gesture and Flow Around Ship Based on Taylor Expansion Boundary Element Method

By: Jiaye Gong and  Yunbo Li  
Open Access
|Jul 2019

References

  1. 1. Chen J.K., Duan W.Y., Zhao B.B., Ma Q.W. : Time domain hybrid TEBEM for 3D hydrodynamics of ship with large flare at forward speed. The 32nd International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, Dalian, China,, 2017, pp. 23-26.
  2. 2. Dai, Y. : Potential flow theory of ship motions in waves. National Defense Industry Publication, Beijing, , 2008. 11-33.
  3. 3. Dawson C.W.: A practical computer method for solving ship-wave problems. In: Proceedings of Second International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, pp. 30-38.
  4. 4. Doctors L.J., 2006. A numerical study of the resistance of transom-stern monohulls. In: Fifth International Conference on High-Performance Marine Vehicles, 1977, pp. 1-14.
  5. 5. Doctors L.J., Macfarlane G.J., Young R. : A study of transom-stern ventilation. In: International Shipbuilding Progress, 54, 2007, pp. 145-163.10.1179/str.2007.54.3.005
  6. 6. Duan W.Y. : Taylor expansion boundary element method for floating body hydrodynamics. In: 27th International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, 2012. Copenhagen, Danmark.
  7. 7. Duan W.Y., Chen, J.K., Zhao, B.B. : Second-order Taylor expansion boundary element method for the second-order wave radiation problem. Applied Ocean Research, 52, 2015, pp. 12-26.10.1016/j.apor.2015.04.011
  8. 8. IHI, SRI, U. of Tokyo and Yokohama N.U. : Cooperative experiments on Wigley parabolic models in Japan, 1983.
  9. 9. Guha A., Falzaranoa J. : Application of multi-objective genetic algorithm in ship hull optimization. Ocean System Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 2 (2015), pp. 91-107.10.12989/ose.2015.5.2.091
  10. 10. Larsson L., Stern F., Visonneau M.: A workshop on numerical ship hydrodynamics. Gothenburg, Sweden, 2010.
  11. 11. Lu Y., Chang X., Hu A.K.: A hydrodynamic optimization design methodology for a ship bulbous bow under multiple operating conditions. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 10, 2016, No. 1, pp. 330–345.10.1080/19942060.2016.1159987
  12. 12. Minchev A., Schmidt M., Schnack S. : Contemporary bulk carrier design to meet IMO EEDI requirements. Third International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Launceston, Tasmania, 2013.
  13. 13. Nakos, D. E.: Ship wave patterns and motions by a three dimensional Rankine panel method. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1990.
  14. 14. Peng H., Ni S., Qiu W.: Wave pattern and resistance prediction for ships of full form. Ocean Engineering, 87, 2014, pp. 162-173.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.06.004
  15. 15. Raven H.C. :. Nonlinear ship wave calculations using the rapid method. In: Sixth International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Iowa City, 1994
  16. 16. Raven H.C.: A solution method for the nonlinear ship wave resistance problem. A Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor., Delft University of Technology, 1996.
  17. 17. Sherbaz S.: Ship Trim Optimization for Reducing Resistance by CFD Simulations. A Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor, Harbin Engineering University, 2014.10.1155/2014/603695
  18. 18. Sun J.L., Tu H.W., Chen Y.N., Xie D., Zhou J.J.: A study on trim optimization for a container ship based on effects due to resistance. Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 60, 2016, No. 1, pp. 30–4710.5957/JOSR.60.1.150022
  19. 19. Tarafder M.S., Alia M.T., Nizamb M.S. : Numerical prediction of wave-making resistance of pentamaran in unbounded water using a surface panel method. Procedia Engineering, 56, 2013, pp. 287-296.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.120
  20. 20. Takeshi H., Hino T., Hinatsu M., Tsukada Y., Fujisawa J.: ITTC Cooperative Experiments on a Series 60 Model at Ship Research Institute-Flow Measurements and Resistance Test, 1987
  21. 21. Tarafder M.S., Suzuki K. : Numerical calculation of free-surface potential flow around a ship using the modified Rankine source panel method. Ocean Engineering, 35, 2008, pp. 536-544.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.11.004
  22. 22. Tarafder M.S., Suzuki K.: Wave-making resistance of a catamaran hull in shallow water using a potential-based panel method. Journal of Ship Research, 52(1), 2008, pp. 16-29.10.5957/jsr.2008.52.1.16
  23. 23. Toda Y., Stern F., Longo J. : Mean-flow measurements in the boundary layer and wake and wave field of a Series 60 CB=0.6 ship model for Froude Numbers 0.16 and 0.316. IIHR Report, No. 352, 1991.10.5957/jsr.1992.36.4.360
  24. 24. Zhang B.J. The optimization of the hull form with the minimum wave making resistance based on Rankine source method. Journal of hydrodynamics, 21(2), 2009, pp. 277-284.10.1016/S1001-6058(08)60146-8
  25. 25. Zhang B.J., Miao A.: The design of a hull form with the minimum total resistance. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 23(5), 2015, pp. 591-597
  26. 26. Zhang B.J., Miao A. : Research on design method of the full form ship with minimum thrust deduction factor, China Ocean Eng., 29(2), 2015, pp. 301-31010.1007/s13344-015-0021-3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2019-0039 | Journal eISSN: 2083-7429 | Journal ISSN: 1233-2585
Language: English
Page range: 198 - 211
Published on: Jul 12, 2019
Published by: Gdansk University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Jiaye Gong, Yunbo Li, published by Gdansk University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.