Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Determination of the Effects of the Pre-Outfitting and Pre-Piping Assembly Operations on Shipyard Productivity Cover

Determination of the Effects of the Pre-Outfitting and Pre-Piping Assembly Operations on Shipyard Productivity

Open Access
|Apr 2013

References

  1. 1. Frankel E.G.: Impact of technological change on shipbuildingproductivity, Journal of Ship Production, 1, 3, 174-183, 1985.10.5957/jsp.1985.1.3.174
  2. 2. Inozu B., et al.: New horizons for shipbuilding processimprovement, Journal of Ship Production, 22, 2, 87-98, 2006.10.5957/jsp.2006.22.2.87
  3. 3. Eker E.: The application of the process improvement concept onthe paint works, MSc Thesis, ITU Institute of Science, Istanbul, 1999.
  4. 4. Hardwick M., Kassel B., Crump B. and Garret S.: Improvingshipyard manufacturing processes using STEP-NC, Journal of Ship Production, 21, 3, 170-176, 2005.10.5957/jsp.2005.21.3.170
  5. 5. DiBarra C.: 5S-A tool for culture change in shipyards, Journal of Ship Production, 18, 3, 143-151, 2002.10.5957/jsp.2002.18.3.143
  6. 6. Odabasi A.Y., Alkaner S., Olcer A. and Sukas N.: Reengineeringof small and medium-sized ship production facilities: Anexample for Turkish Shipbuilding industry, Journal of Ship Production, 13, 1, 8-15, 1997.10.5957/jsp.1997.13.1.8
  7. 7. Odabasi A.Y., et al.: Development and evaluation of MarmaraShipyard’s expansion program, Contract Report, Istanbul, 1993.
  8. 8. Larson T., and Tice J.: Lean and EMS Integration Workshop, Environmental Technologies, Ship Production Panels, USA, 2005.
  9. 9. Lamb T.: Simulation-based performance improvement forshipbuilding processes, Journal of Ship Production, Vol. 22, No. 2, May, pp.49-65, 2006.10.5957/jsp.2006.22.2.49
  10. 10. Shin J.G.: A modeling and simulation of production process insubassembly lines at a shipyard, Journal of Ship Production, Vol.20, No.2, May, pp.79-83, 2004.10.5957/jsp.2004.20.2.79
  11. 11. Shin J.G.: A concept and framework for a shipyard layout designbased on simulation, Journal of Ship Production, Vol.25, No.3, August, pp.126-135, 2009.10.5957/jsp.2009.25.3.126
  12. 12. Alkaner S.: The Modelling and Analysis of Ship Production withSimulation: Case Study, PhD Thesis, ITU Institute of Science, Istanbul, 1998.
  13. 13. Greenwood A.G., Hill H.W.: Simulation Optimization DecisionSupport System for Ship Panel Shop Operations, Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 2078-2086, 2005.
  14. 14. Kelton W.D., Sadowski R.P. and Sturrock D.T.: Simulation withArena, Third edition, McGraw-Hill, 1998.
  15. 15. Fafandjel N., et al.: Procedure for measuring shipbuildingprocess optimization results after using modular outfittingconcept, Urednistvo Casopisa Strojartvo, 50, 3, 141-150, 2008.
  16. 16. Yu H. and Ishida K.: The evaluation of the effectivenessof modular outfitting of engine room machines, Fourth International Conference on Marine Technology, 23-25 May, Poland, 391-399, 2001.
  17. 17. Baade R., et al.: Modular outfitting, Journal of Ship Production, 14, 3, 170-179, 1998.10.5957/jsp.1998.14.3.170
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2013-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2083-7429 | Journal ISSN: 1233-2585
Language: English
Page range: 59 - 69
Published on: Apr 12, 2013
Published by: Gdansk University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2013 Murat Ozkok, I. Hakki Helvacioglu, published by Gdansk University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.