Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Factors Influencing Work-Related Attitudes of Top Managers: An Expert Perspective Cover

Factors Influencing Work-Related Attitudes of Top Managers: An Expert Perspective

Open Access
|Jan 2024

References

  1. Alparslan, A. (2006). Grundzüge der Prinzipal-Agent-Theorie. In Adem Alparslan (Ed.), Strukturalistische Prinzipal-Agent-Theorie. Wiesbaden: DUV.
  2. Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496. https://doi.org/10.2307/258555
  3. Bergh, D. D., Ketchen, D. J., Orlandi, I., Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Boyd, B. K. (2019). Information Asymmetry in Management Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Opportunities. Journal of Management, 45(1), 122–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318798026
  4. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419
  5. Döring, N., & Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial-und Humanwissenschaften (5. vollständig überarbeitete, aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage). Springer-Lehrbuch. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5
  6. Dunk, A. S. (1992). The Effect of Budget Emphasis and Information Asymmetry on the Relation between Budgetary Participation and Slack. The Accounting Review, 68(2), 400–410. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/248408
  7. Edmondson, A. C., Roberto, M. A., & Watkins, M. D. (2003). A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: managing unstructured task streams. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00021-3
  8. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Agency and Institutional Theory explanations: the case of Retail sales. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 488–511.
  9. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/258191
  10. Enns, H. G., Huff, S. L., & Golden, B. R. (2001). How CIOs obtain peer commitment to strategic IS proposals: Barriers and facilitators. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 10(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(01)00041-5
  11. Guillemette, M. G., & Paré, G. (2012). Transformation of the Information Technology Function in Organizations: A Case Study in the Manufacturing Sector. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L’administration, 29(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.224
  12. Gurbaxani, V., & Kemerer, C. F. (1990). An Agency Theory view of the Management of end-user computing. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Copenhagen.
  13. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  14. Kraus, R., & Kreitenweis, T. (Eds.) (2020). Führung messen. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60518-9
  15. Mertens, P., & Knolmayer, G. (1995). Organisation der Informationsverarbeitung: Grundlagen, Aufbau, Arbeitsteilung (2., überarb. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Gabler.
  16. Park, S. M. (2010). The Effects of Personnel Reform Systems on Georgia State Employees’ Attitudes. Public Management Review, 12(3), 403–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030903286631
  17. Pratt, J. W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1985). Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Harward Business School Press.
  18. Roscher, B. E. (2021). Understanding the theoretical foundations of CIO impact on organisatioal effectiveness: prior and planed research. In Proceedings of the 15th CER Comparative European Research Conference: International Scientific Conference for Ph.D. Students of EU Countries (pp. 44–48). London: Sciemcee Publishing.
  19. Shafagatova, A., van Looy, A., & Maleki Shamasbi, S. (2023). Uncovering the Combined Impact of Process Characteristics and Reward Types on Employees’ Job Satisfaction: A European Quantitative Study. SAGE Open, 13(1), 215824402311601. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231160125
  20. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics. American Economic Review, 92(3), 460–501. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260136363
  21. Vanneste, B. S., Puranam, P., & Kretschmer, T. (2014). Trust over time in exchange relationships: Meta-analysis and theory. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), 1891–1902. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2198
  22. Zeffane, R., & Melhem, S. B. (2018). Do feelings of trust/distrust affect employees’ turnover intentions? An exploratory study in the United Arab Emirates. Middle East J. Of Management, 5(4), 385. https://doi.org/10.1504/MEJM.2018.10016479
Language: English
Page range: 31 - 43
Submitted on: Oct 4, 2023
Accepted on: Dec 6, 2023
Published on: Jan 22, 2024
Published by: Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Bjarne Erik Roscher, Signe Balina, published by Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.