Avoidant Addresses in Japanese Families Reflect Family Conflicts
By: Kenji Yokotani
Open Access
|Jun 2013
References
- Brown, R. & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In A.S. Thomas (Ed.), Style and Language (pp. 253-276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Crozier, W.R. & Dimmock, P.S. (1999). Name-calling and nicknames in a sample of primary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 505-516.
- Crozier, W.R. & Skliopidou, E. (2002). Adult recollections of name-calling at school. Educational Psychology, 22, 113-124
- Dickey, E. (1997). Forms of address and terms of reference. Journal of Linguistics, 33, 255-274.
- Durkheim, E. (1915). The elementary forms of the religious life (trans. by J.W. Swain). London: Allen and Unwin (Original work published 1912).
- Edgar, D. (2004). Globalization and Western bias in family sociology. In J. Scott, J. Treas, & M. Richards (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology ofFamilies (pp. 3-16). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Ervin-Tripp, S. (1972). On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In J.J. Gumpez & D.H. Hymes (Eds), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnographyof Communication (pp. 213-250). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Fauchier, A. & Margolin, G. (2004). Affection and conflict in marital and parentchild relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30 (2), 197-211.
- Forgatch, M.S., Patterson, G.R., Degarmo, D.S., & Beldavs, Z.G. (2009). Testing the Oregon delinquency model with 9-year follow-up of the Oregon divorce study. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 637-660.
- Harris, C.L., Ayciceg, I., & Gleason, J.B. (2003). Taboo words and reprimands elicit greater autonomic reactivity in a first language than in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 561-579.
- Kapfere, B. (1969). Norms and the manipulation of relationships in a work context. In J.C. Mitchell (Ed.), Social Networks in Urban Situations (pp.181-244). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
- Koo, J.H. (1992). The term of address ‘you’ in South Korea today. Korea Journal, 32 (1), 27-42.
- Lévi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship (trans. by J.H. Bell, J.R. Sturmer, & R. Needham). Boston: Beacon Press (Original work published 1967).
- Little, C.B. & Gelles, R. (1975). The social psychological implications of form of address. Sociometry, 38 (4), 573-586.
- Luong, H.V. (1988). Discursive practices and power structure: Person-referring forms and sociopolitical struggles in colonial Vietnam. American Ethnologist, 15 (2), 239-253.
- Margolin, G., Christensen, A., & John, R.S. (1996). The continuance and spillover of everyday tensions in distressed and nondistressed families. Journal of FamilyPsychology, 10, 304-321.
- Mbaya, M. (2002). Linguistic taboo in African marriage context: A study of the Oromo Laguu. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 11 (2), 224-235.
- McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). “What’s in a name?” Social labeling and gender practices. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender (pp. 69-97). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Patterson, G.R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia Publishing Company.
- Peng, F.C.C. (1974). Communicative distance. Language Sciences, 31, 32-38.
- Peng, F.C.C. (1977). Urbanization and language science: The Japanese case. In F.C.C. Peng (Ed.), Kankyo to kotoba [Environment and language] (pp. 1-26). Hiroshima: Bunka Hyoron Shuppan.
- Romney, A.K. & Moore, C.C. (1998). Toward a theory of culture as shared cognitive structures. Ethos, 26 (3), 314-337.
- Sakurai, M. (1984). On the vocabulary and kinship terminology of the imperial family of Japan. Language Sciences, 6 (1), 53-72.
- Suzuki, K. (1993). Results and comments about questionnaire investigation [in Japanese]. Tozainanboku, 1993, 112-121.
- Suzuki, T. (1987). Reflections on Japanese language and culture. Tokyo: Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies, Keio University.
- Taylor, A. (2002). The handbook of family dispute resolution: Mediation theory andpractice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass library of conflict resolution.
- Tin, L-G. (2008). Who is Afraid of Blacks in France? The Black Question: The Name Taboo, the Number Taboo. French Politics, Culture and Society, 26 (1), 32-44.
- Widmer, E., Romney, A.K., & Boyd, J. (1999). Cognitive aspects of step- terms in American kinship. American Anthropologist, 101 (2), 374-378.
- Yokotani, K. (2008). An empirical study about deviant family nicknames and family violence: Focused on the deviant family nicknames [in Japanese]. JapaneseJournal of Family Psychology, 22 (1), 14-27.
- Yokotani, K. & Hasegawa, K. (2009). Definition of deviant family nicknames [in Japanese]. Annual Report of Graduate School of Education, Tohoku University, 58 (1), 197-205.
- Yokotani, K. & Hasegawa, K. (2010a). Reliability and validity of the deviant family nicknames as family functioning assessment [in Japanese]. Japanese Journalof Family Psychology, 24 (1), 30-41.
- Yokotani, K. & Hasegawa, K. (2010b). Discourse modality of family nicknames: Comparison between unbound family nicknames and the other family nicknames [in Japanese]. Annual Report of Graduate School of Education, TohokuUniversity, 59 (1), 275-292.
- Yokotani, K. & Hasegawa, K. (2011). Children’s nickname toward their parents and their attachment styles [in Japanese]. Japanese Journal of Family Psychology, 25 (1), 45-55.
Language: English
Page range: 65 - 77
Published on: Jun 1, 2013
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Related subjects:
© 2013 Kenji Yokotani, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.