Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Diagnostic performance of machine learning algorithms in breast ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis Cover

Diagnostic performance of machine learning algorithms in breast ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering
Volume 32 (2026): Issue 3 (September 2026)
By: ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Sep 2026
Read online
References

References

  1. Xue P, Wang J, Qin D, et al. Deep learning in image-based breast and cervical cancer detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. npj Digit Med. 2022;5(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00559-z
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Lee CF, Lin J, Huang YL, et al. Deep learning-based breast MRI for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Imaging. 2025;25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-025-00863-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Interlenghi M, Salvatore C, Magni V, et al. A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses. Diagnostics. 2022;12(1):187. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010187
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Russo AG, Murtas R, Ballotari P, et al. Analisi dei fattori predittivi della mancata adesione allo screening organizzato per i tumori del colon retto e della mammella nel periodo pre-pandemico (2018-2019) in Lombardia. E&P. 2024;48(2):118-129. https://doi.org/10.19191/EP24.2.A720.039
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Lu Y, Yang F, Tao Y, An P. An XGBoost Machine Learning Based Model for Predicting Ki-67 Value ≥ 15% in T2NXM0 Stage Primary Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Clinical Data and Delta-Radiomic Features on Ultrasound Images and Overall Survival Analysis: A 5-Year Postoperative Follow-Up Study. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024;23. https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338241265989
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Wang SR, Tian F, Zhu T, et al. Machine learning-driven ultrasound radiomics for assessing axillary lymph node burden in breast cancer. Front Endocrinol. 2025;16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1548888
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Rana SP, Dey M, Tiberi G, et al. Machine Learning Approaches for Automated Lesion Detection in Microwave Breast Imaging Clinical Data. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46974-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Gagliardi M, Ruga T, Zumpano E, Vocaturo E. Breast Cancer classification via Deep Learning approaches. S Reports. 2024;1(4). https://doi.org/10.69848/sreports.v1i4.4992
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Xiang H, Wang X, Xu M, et al. Deep Learning-assisted Diagnosis of Breast Lesions on US Images: A Multivendor, Multicenter Study. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. 2023;5(5). https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.220185
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Tanaka H, Chiu SW, Watanabe T, Kaoku S, Yamaguchi T. Computer-aided diagnosis system for breast ultrasound images using deep learning. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64(23):235013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab5093
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Romeo V, Cuocolo R, Apolito R, et al. Clinical value of radiomics and machine learning in breast ultrasound: a multicenter study for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(12):9511-9519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08009-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Zhao C, Xiao M, Jiang Y, et al. Feasibility of computer-assisted diagnosis for breast ultrasound: the results of the diagnostic performance of S-detect from a single center in China. CMAR. 2019;11:921-930. https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s190966
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Misra S, Yoon C, Kim K, et al. Deep learning‐based multimodal fusion network for segmentation and classification of breast cancers using B‐mode and elastography ultrasound images. Bioeng Transl Med. 2022;8(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10480
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Lu G, Tian R, Yang W, et al. Deep learning radiomics based on multimodal imaging for distinguishing benign and malignant breast tumours. Front Med. 2024;11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1402967
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Liang F, Song Y, Huang X, et al. Assessing breast disease with deep learning model using bimodal bi-view ultrasound images and clinical information. iScience. 2024;27(7):110279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.110279
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Hassan W, Hossain M. Deep Learning for Breast Mass Discrimination: Integration of B-Mode Ultrasound & Nakagami Imaging with Automatic Lesion Segmentation. Published online September 15, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.14.25335722
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Yan L, Liang Z, Zhang H, et al. A domain knowledge-based interpretable deep learning system for improving clinical breast ultrasound diagnosis. Commun Med. 2024;4(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00518-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Xu Z, Zhong S, Gao Y, et al. Optimizing breast lesions diagnosis and decision-making with a deep learning fusion model integrating ultrasound and mammography: a dual-center retrospective study. Breast Cancer Res. 2025;27(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02033-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Zhang X, Li H, Wang C, et al. Evaluating the Accuracy of Breast Cancer and Molecular Subtype Diagnosis by Ultrasound Image Deep Learning Model. Front Oncol. 2021;11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.623506
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Xing B, Gu C, Fu C, Zhang B, Tan Y. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound S-Detect technology in evaluating BI-RADS-4 breast nodules ≤ 20 mm and > 20 mm. BMC Cancer. 2025;25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14760-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Tsuyuzaki S, Fujioka T, Yamaga E, et al. Evaluation of AI diagnostic systems for breast ultrasound: comparative analysis with radiologists and the effect of AI assistance. Jpn J Radiol. 2025;43(10):1643-1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01809-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Amir T, Coffey K, Sevilimedu V, Fardanesh R, Mango VL. A role for breast ultrasound Artificial Intelligence decision support in the evaluation of small invasive lobular carcinomas. Clinical Imaging. 2023;101:77-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.05.005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Yuan WH, Hsu HC, Chen YY, Wu CH. Supplemental breast cancer-screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2020;123(4):673-688. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0928-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Eisemann N, Bunk S, Mukama T, et al. Nationwide real-world implementation of AI for cancer detection in population-based mammography screening. Nat Med. 2025;31(3):917-924. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03408-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Lee SE, Yoon JH, Son NH, Han K, Moon HJ. Screening in Patients With Dense Breasts: Comparison of Mammography, Artificial Intelligence, and Supplementary Ultrasound. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2024;222(1). https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.23.29655
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Lin X, Liao T, Yang Y, et al. Value of deep learning model for predicting Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 and 4A lesions on mammography. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025;15(5):4047-4058. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-1523
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. He P, Chen W, Bai MY, et al. Deep Learning–Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Lesion Classification on Ultrasound: A Prospective Multi-center Study of Radiologists Without Breast Ultrasound Expertise. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2023;221(4):450-459. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.23.29328
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Hayashida T, Odani E, Kikuchi M, et al. Establishment of a deep‐learning system to diagnose BI‐RADS4a or higher using breast ultrasound for clinical application. Cancer Science. 2022;113(10):3528-3534. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.15511
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Eun NL, Lee E, Park AY, Son EJ, Kim JA, Youk JH. Artificial intelligence for ultrasound microflow imaging in breast cancer diagnosis. Ultraschall Med. 2024;45(04):412-417. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2230-2455
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Guldogan N, Taskin F, Icten GE, et al. Artificial Intelligence in BI-RADS Categorization of Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: Can We Omit Excessive Follow-ups and Biopsies? Academic Radiology. 2024;31(6):2194-2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.11.031
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Berg WA, López Aldrete AL, Jairaj A, et al. Toward AI-supported US Triage of Women with Palpable Breast Lumps in a Low-Resource Setting. Radiology. 2023;307(4). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.223351
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Gu Y, Xu W, Lin B, et al. Deep learning based on ultrasound images assists breast lesion diagnosis in China: a multicenter diagnostic study. Insights Imaging. 2022;13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01259-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Shen Y, Shamout FE, Oliver JR, et al. Artificial intelligence system reduces false-positive findings in the interpretation of breast ultrasound exams. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26023-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Qiu S, Zhuang S, Li B, Wang J, Zhuang Z. Prospective assessment of breast lesions AI classification model based on ultrasound dynamic videos and ACR BI-RADS characteristics. Front Oncol. 2023;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1274557
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Jin ZY, Li JK, Niu RL, et al. Application of an artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system for breast ultrasound: a prospective study. Gland Surg. 2024;13(12):2221-2231. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-213
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Qu C, Xia F, Chen L, Li HJ, Li WM. Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence in Minimal Breast Lesions Based on Real-Time Dynamic Ultrasound Imaging. IJGM. 2024;Volume 17:4061-4069. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s479969
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Çelebi F, Tuncer O, Oral M, Duymaz T, Orhan T, Ertaş G. Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Breast Ultrasound: A Comparative Analysis of Decision Support Among Radiologists With Various Levels of Expertise. EJBH. 2025;21(1):33-39. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2024.2024-9-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Li H, Zhao J, Jiang Z. Deep learning-based computer-aided detection of ultrasound in breast cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Radiology. 2024;79(11):e1403-e1413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.08.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Kwon M ri, Youn I, Lee MY, Lee HA. Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence–Based Computer-Aided Detection Software for Automated Breast Ultrasound. Academic Radiology. 2024;31(2):480-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.09.013
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Zhang N, Li XT, Ma L, Fan ZQ, Sun YS. Application of deep learning to establish a diagnostic model of breast lesions using two-dimensional grayscale ultrasound imaging. Clinical Imaging. 2021;79:56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.03.024
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Lai YC, Chen HH, Hsu JF, Hong YJ, Chiu TT, Chiou HJ. Evaluation of physician performance using a concurrent-read artificial intelligence system to support breast ultrasound interpretation. The Breast. 2022;65:124-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.07.009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Sun Y, Qu Y, et al. Deep learning model improves radiologists’ performance in detection and classification of breast lesions. Chinese Journal of Cancer Research. 2021;33(6):682-693. https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.06.05
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Du Y, Ma J, Wu T, et al. Downgrading Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories in ultrasound using strain elastography and computer-aided diagnosis system: a multicenter, prospective study. British Journal of Radiology. 2024;97(1162):1653-1660. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae136
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Tian H, Cai L, Gui Y, et al. Two-stage augmentation for detecting malignancy of BI-RADS 3 lesions in early breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2025;25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13960-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Yang Y, Zhong Y, Li J, et al. Deep learning combining mammography and ultrasound images to predict the malignancy of BI-RADS US 4A lesions in women with dense breasts: a diagnostic study. International Journal of Surgery. 2024;110(5):2604-2613. https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000001186
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Ma B, Wu G, Zhu H, et al. The Prediction Model of High-Frequency Ultrasound Combined with Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Scoring System Improved the Diagnosis of Sclerosing Adenosis and Early Breast Cancer. BCTT. 2025;17:145-155. https://doi.org/10.2147/bctt.s483496
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Nakai E, Miyagi Y, Suzuki K, et al. Artificial intelligence as a second reader for screening mammography. Radiology Advances. 2024;1(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/radadv/umae011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Chang YW, Ryu JK, An JK, et al. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer screening in mammography (AI-STREAM): preliminary analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort study. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57469-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. van Winkel SL, Rodríguez-Ruiz A, Appelman L, et al. Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(11):8682-8691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07992-w
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Brejnebøl MW, Lenskjold A, Ziegeler K, et al. Interobserver Agreement and Performance of Concurrent AI Assistance for Radiographic Evaluation of Knee Osteoarthritis. Radiology. 2024;312(1). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233341
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Choi EJ, Lee EH, Kim YM, et al. Interobserver agreement in breast ultrasound categorization in the Mammography and Ultrasonography Study for Breast Cancer Screening Effectiveness (MUST-BE) trial: results of a preliminary study. Ultrasonography. 2019;38(2):172-180. https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.18012
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Ramli Hamid MT, Ab Mumin N, Abdul Hamid S, et al. Comparative analysis of diagnostic performance in mammography: A reader study on the impact of AI assistance. Arita Y, ed. PLoS One. 2025;20(5):e0322925. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322925
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Brunetti N, Calabrese M, Martinoli C, Tagliafico AS. Artificial Intelligence in Breast Ultrasound: From Diagnosis to Prognosis—A Rapid Review. Diagnostics. 2022;13(1):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010058
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Goh S, Goh RSJ, Chong B, et al. Challenges in Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Screening Programs: Systematic Review and Framework for Safe Adoption. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e62941. https://doi.org/10.2196/62941
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. Chen J, Pan T, Zhu Z, et al. A deep learning-based multimodal medical imaging model for breast cancer screening. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99535-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. El Arab RA, Al Moosa OA. Systematic review of cost effectiveness and budget impact of artificial intelligence in healthcare. npj Digit Med. 2025;8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01722-y
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2026-0022 | Journal eISSN: 1898-0309 (formerly 1425-4689) | Journal ISSN: 1425-4689
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 206 - 226
Submitted on: Jun 30, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 26, 2026
Published online: Sep 30, 2026
Published in print: Sep 1, 2026
Published by: Polish Society of Medical Physics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
deep learning,
convolutional neural networks,
specificity,
radiologists,
screening,
sensitivity
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Biomedical engineering,
Physics,
Technical and applied physics,
Medical physics

© 2026 Gianluca Sellaro, Pasquale Pellegrino, Francesco Spinelli, Daniela Bernardi, published by Polish Society of Medical Physics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 32 (2026): Issue 3 (September 2026)
Previous article