References
- Polish National Cancer Registry. https://onkologia.org.pl/
- Huang TC, Chou KT, Yang SN, Chang CK, Liang JA, Zhang G. Fractionated changes in prostate cancer radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography. Medical Dosimetry. 2015;40(3):222-225. doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2014.12.003
- de Crevoisier R, Tucker SL, Dong L, et al. Increased risk of biochemical and local failure in patients with distended rectum on the planning CT for prostate cancer radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2005;62(4):965-973. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.032
- Heemsbergen WD, Hoogeman MS, Witte MG, Peeters STH, Incrocci L, Lebesque JV. Increased Risk of Biochemical and Clinical Failure for Prostate Patients with a Large Rectum at Radiotherapy Planning: Results from the Dutch Trial of 68 GY Versus 78 Gy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2007;67(5):1418-1424. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.014
- Valicenti RK, Michalski JM, Bosch WR, et al. Is weekly port filming adequate for verifying patient position in modern radiation therapy? International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 1994;30(2):431-438. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(94)90025-6
- de Boer HCJ, Heijmen BJM. A protocol for the reduction of systematic patient setup errors with minimal portal imaging workload. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2001;50(5):1350-1365. doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01624-8
- Dąbrowski A, Kukołowicz PF, Sadowska E. Quantitative evaluation of setup deviations during the course of pelvic irradiation with 4 field box technique. Nowotwory. 2001;51(2):123-128
- Hurkmans CW, Remeijer P, Lebesque JV, Mijnheer BJ. Set-up verification using portal imaging; review of current clinical practice. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2001;58(2):105-120. doi:10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00260-7
- Bel A, van Herk M, Bartelink H, Lebesque JV. A verification procedure to improve patient set-up accuracy using portal images. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 1993;29(2):253-260. doi:10.1016/0167-8140(93)90255-7
- Bijhold J, Lebesque JV, Hart AAM, Vijlbrief RE. Maximizing setup accuracy using portal images as applied to a conformal boost technique for prostatic cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 1992;24(4):261-271. doi:10.1016/0167-8140(92)90233-k
- Stroom JC, Olofsen-van Acht MJJ, Quint S, et al. On-line set-up corrections during radiotherapy of patients with gynecologic tumors. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2000;46(2):499-506. doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00386-7
- de Boer HCJ, Heijmen BJM. eNAL: An Extension of the NAL Setup Correction Protocol for Effective Use of Weekly Follow-up Measurements. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2007;67(5):1586-1595. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.050
- Dąbrowski A, Zielińska-Dąbrowska S, Kuszewski T, Lis K. Daily patient geometry correction: application of NAL and eNAL protocols. Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering. 2020;26(4):181-184. doi:10.2478/pjmpe-2020-0021
- Kukolowicz P, Mietelska M, Kiprian D. Effectiveness of the No action level protocol for head & neck patients – Time considerations. Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy. 2020;25(5):828-831. doi:10.1016/j.rpor.2020.04.005
- Martens D, Luesink M, Huizenga H, Pasma KL. eNAL++: a new and effective off‐line correction protocol for rotational setup errors when using a robotic couch. J Applied Clin Med Phys. 2015;16(6):177-185. doi:10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5583
- Huang TC, Chou KT, Yang SN, Chang CK, Liang JA, Zhang G. Fractionated changes in prostate cancer radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography. Medical Dosimetry. 2015;40(3):222-225. doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2014.12.003
- Ahmad SS, Duke S, Jena R, Williams MV, Burnet NG. Advances in radiotherapy. BMJ. 2012;345(dec04 1):e7765-e7765. doi:10.1136/bmj.e7765
- Connell PP, Hellman S. Advances in Radiotherapy and Implications for the Next Century: A Historical Perspective. Cancer Research. 2009;69(2):383-392. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-6871
- Antolak JA, Rosen II, Childress CH, Zagars GK, Pollack A. Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 1998;42(3):661-672. doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00248-x
- de Crevoisier R, Melancon AD, Kuban DA, et al. Changes in the Pelvic Anatomy After an IMRT Treatment Fraction of Prostate Cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2007;68(5):1529-1536. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.069
- McDermott LN, Wendling M, Sonke JJ, van Herk M, Mijnheer BJ. Anatomy changes in radiotherapy detected using portal imaging. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2006;79(2):211-217. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2006.04.003
- Noble DJ, Yeap PL, Seah SYK, et al. Anatomical change during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer, and its effect on delivered dose to the spinal cord. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2019;130:32-38. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2018.07.009
- Lim-Reinders S, Keller BM, Al-Ward S, Sahgal A, Kim A. Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2017;99(4):994-1003. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.04.023
- Maruoka S, Yoshioka Y, Isohashi F, et al. Correlation between patients’ anatomical characteristics and interfractional internal prostate motion during intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. SpringerPlus. 2015;4(1). doi:10.1186/s40064-015-1382-z
- Wong JR, Gao Z, Merrick S, et al. Potential for Higher Treatment Failure in Obese Patients: Correlation of Elevated Body Mass Index and Increased Daily Prostate Deviations From the Radiation Beam Isocenters in an Analysis of 1,465 Computed Tomographic Images. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2009;75(1):49-55. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.049
- Roeske JC, Forman JD, Mesina CF, et al. Evaluation of changes in the size and location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum during a course of external beam radiation therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 1995;33(5):1321-1329. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(95)00225-1
- Ma TM, Neylon J, Casado M, et al. Dosimetric impact of interfraction prostate and seminal vesicle volume changes and rotation: A post-hoc analysis of a phase III randomized trial of MRI-guided versus CT-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2022;167:203-210. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.037
- Zelefsky MJ, Crean D, Mageras GS, et al. Quantification and predictors of prostate position variability in 50 patients evaluated with multiple CT scans during conformal radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 1999;50(2):225-234. doi:10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00011-0
- de Muinck Keizer DM, Kerkmeijer LGW, Willigenburg T, et al. Prostate intrafraction motion during the preparation and delivery of MR-guided radiotherapy sessions on a 1.5T MR-Linac. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2020;151:88-94. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2020.06.044
- Tanabe Y, Ishida T, Eto H, Sera T, Emoto Y, Shimokawa M. Patient-specific radiotherapy quality assurance for estimating actual treatment dose. Medical Dosimetry. 2021;46(1):e5-e10. doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2020.08.003
- Tetar SU, Bruynzeel AME, Oei SS, et al. Magnetic Resonance-guided Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Final Results on Patient-reported Outcomes of a Prospective Phase 2 Study. European Urology Oncology. 2021;4(4):628-634. doi:10.1016/j.euo.2020.05.007
- Alongi F, Rigo M, Figlia V, et al. 1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted SBRT for prostate cancer: feasibility, preliminary clinical tolerability, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during treatment. Radiat Oncol. 2020;15(1). doi:10.1186/s13014-020-01510-w
- Cuccia F, Corradini S, Mazzola R, et al. MR-Guided Hypofractionated Radiotherapy: Current Emerging Data and Promising Perspectives for Localized Prostate Cancer. Cancers. 2021;13(8):1791. doi:10.3390/cancers13081791
- Yan D, Vicini F, Wong J, Martinez A. Adaptive radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 1997;42(1):123-132. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/42/1/008