References
- Hernandez V, et al. What is plan quality in radiotherapy? The importance of evaluating dose metrics, complexity, and robustness of treatment plans. Radiother Oncol. 2020;153:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.038
- Jaffray D. Image-guided radiotherapy: from current concept to future perspectives. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9:688-699. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.194
- McDonald BA, et al. Dose accumulation for MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy: From practical considerations to state-of-the-art clinical implementation. Front Oncol. 2023;12:1086258. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1086258
- Cheung J, et al. Dose Recalculation and the Dose-Guided Radiation Therapy (DGRT) Process Using Megavoltage Cone-Beam CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74(2):583-592. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.034
- Glide-Hurst CK, et al. Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART) Strategies and Technical Considerations: A State of the ART Review From NRG Oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;109(4):1054-1075. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.021
- Aristophanous M, et al. Clinical Experience With an Offline Adaptive Radiation Therapy Head and Neck Program: Dosimetric Benefits and Opportunities for Patient Selection. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024;119(5):1557-1568. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.016
- Green OL, et al. Practical Clinical Workflows for Online and Offline Adaptive Radiation Therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019;29(3):219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.02.004
- Lu L, et al. A Review of Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy. Appl Rad Oncol. 2024;5(1): (online ahead of print). doi: 10.37549/ARO-D-24-00037
- Kisling K et al. Clinical commissioning of an adaptive radiotherapy platform: Results and recommendations. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022;23(12):e13801. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13801.
- Hindmarsh J, et al. A dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy treatment delivery with real-time adaptation and no motion correction. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025;34:100741. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100741
- Czajkowski P, et al. Registration methods in radiotherapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2019;24:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.09.004
- Lavrova E, et al. Adaptive Radiation Therapy: A Review of CT-based Techniques. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2023;5(4):e230011. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230011
- Posiewnik M, et al. A review of cone-beam CT applications for adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Phys Med. 2019;59:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.02.014
- Ruchala K, et al. Megavoltage CT on a tomotherapy system. Phys Med Biol. 1999;44(10):2597-2621. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/10/316
- Tegtmeier RC, et al. Characterization of imaging performance of a novel helical kVCT for use in image-guided and adaptive radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022;23(6):e13648. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13648
- Ng J, et al. MRI-LINAC: A transformative technology in radiation oncology. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1117874. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1117874
- Oderinde OM, et al. The technical design and concept of a PET/CT linac for biology-guided radiotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021;29:106-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.04.003
- Onal C, et al. Dosimetric evaluation of ultra fractionated dose escalation with simultaneous integrated boost to intraprostatic lesion using 1.5-Tesla MR-Linac in localized prostate cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2024;29(1):10-20. doi: 10.5603/rpor.99358.
- Ladbury C, et al. Biology-Guided Radiation Therapy: An Evolving Treatment Paradigm. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2023;32(3):553-568. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.02.006
- Datta A, et al. Delivering Functional Imaging on the MRI-Linac: Current Challenges and Potential Solutions. Clin Oncol. 2018; 30(11):702-710. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.08.005
- Wu C, et al. Real-time 4D MRI using MR signature matching (MRSIGMA) on a 1.5T MR-Linac system. Phys Med Biol. 2023;68(18): (epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf3cc
- Chen GP, et al. Clinical Implementation and Initial Experience of Real-Time Motion Tracking With Jaws and Multileaf Collimator During Helical Tomotherapy Delivery. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021;11(5):e486–e495. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.01.010
- Giacometti V, et al. An evaluation of techniques for dose calculation on cone-beam computed tomography. Br J Radiol. 2019; 92(1096):20180383. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180383
- Richter A, et al. Investigation of the usability of cone-beam CT data sets for dose calculation. Radiat Oncol. 2008;3:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-3-42
- Hu Y, et al. Synthetic CT generation based on CBCT using improved vision transformer CycleGAN. Sci Rep. 2024;14:11455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61492-7
- Hsu SH, et al. Synthetic CT generation for MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:969463. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.969463
- Acquah IK, et al. A systematic review of deep learning techniques for generating synthetic CT images from MRI data. Pol J Med Phys Eng. 2025;31(1):20-38. doi: 10.2478/pjmpe-2025-0003
- Simon A, et al. Roles of deformable image registration in adaptive RT: From contour propagation to dose monitoring. Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:5215-5218. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319567
- Brock KK, et al. Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 132. Med Phys. 2017;44(7):e43-e76. doi: 10.1002/mp.12256
- Latifi K, et al. Practical quantification of image registration accuracy following the AAPM TG-132 report framework. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018; 19(4):125-133. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12348
- Zhong H, et al. Deformable dose accumulation is required for adaptive radiotherapy practice. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024;25(8):e14457. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14457
- Lim SY, et al. Dose accumulation of daily adaptive plans to decide optimal plan adaptation strategy for head-and-neck patients treated with MRLinac. Med Dosim. 2022;47(1):103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.08.005
- Klein EE, et al. Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009 36(9):4197-4212. doi: 10.1118/1.3190392
- de Pooter J, et al. Reference dosimetry in MRI-linacs: evaluation of available protocols and data to establish a Code of Practice. Phys Med Biol. 2021;66(5):05TR02. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab9efe
- Schreiner LJ. End-to-end QA in image-guided and adaptive radiation therapy. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1305:012062. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1305/1/012062
- Nishioka S, et al. Identifying risk characteristics using failure mode and effect analysis for risk management in online MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022;23:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.06.002
- Wegener S, et al. Re-evaluation of the prospective risk analysis for AI-driven CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy after one year of clinical experience. Z Med Phys. 2024; 34(3):397-407. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2024.05.001
- Zhao X, et al. Do we need patient-specific QA for adaptively generated plans? Retrospective evaluation of delivered online adaptive treatment plans on Varian Ethos. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023;24(2):e13876. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13876
- Olaciregui-Ruiz I, et al. Automatic dosimetric verification of online adapted plans on the Unity MR-Linac using 3D EPID dosimetry. Radiother Oncol. 2021;157:241-246. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.037
- Tan X, et al. Fractional dose verification of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer based on exit fluences and log files. J Rad Res Appl Sci. 2023;16(1):100489. doi: 10.1016/j.jrras.2022.100489