Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Are the bone density measurements around dental implants varied with different angles of CBCT view? Cover

Are the bone density measurements around dental implants varied with different angles of CBCT view?

Open Access
|Jun 2025

References

  1. Jurić B, Matijaš T. The role of CBCT in the field of dental implantology. Radiol vjesn (Online). 2023;47(1):16-27. doi:10.55378/rv.47.1.2
  2. Jain A, Shil M, Sreepradha C, Rai S, Kaur I, Banka A. A Review on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and its Application in Dentistry. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2023;16(Suppl 1):S38-S40. doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_741_23
  3. Lechner J, Zimmermann B, Schmidt M, von Baehr V. <p>Ultrasound Sonography to Detect Focal Osteoporotic Jawbone Marrow Defects: Clinical Comparative Study with Corresponding Hounsfield Units and RANTES/CCL5 Expression</p> CCIDE. 2020;Volume 12:205-216. doi:10.2147/ccide.s247345
  4. Apostolopoulou A. In vivo measurement of mandibular bone mineral density in normal dental subjects by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Bone. 1996;19(3):130S. doi:10.1016/8756-3282(96)89261-1
  5. Ito Y, Fujita H, Kanou M, et al. Rapid and easy histological evaluation of alveolar human bone quality at dental implant sites using a nondecalcified frozen cryofilm section technique: A technical report. Implant Dentistry, 2015. 24(4): p. 477-479. doi:10.1097/id.0000000000000272
  6. Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clinical Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(1):79-84. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001079.x
  7. Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, et al. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2006;21(2):290-207.
  8. Turkyilmaz I, Tumer C, Ozbek EN, Tözüm TF. Relations between the bone density values from computerized tomography, and implant stability parameters: a clinical study of 230 regular platform implants. J Clinic Periodontology. 2007;34(8):716-722. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2007.01112.x
  9. de Oliveira RCG, Leles CR, Normanha LM, Lindh C, Ribeiro-Rotta RF. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2008;105(2):231-238. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.007
  10. Fuh LJ, Huang HL, Chen CS, et al. Variations in bone density at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2010;37(5):346-351. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02061.x
  11. Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 2: Clinical Applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(7):1285-1292. doi:10.3174/ajnr.a1654
  12. Jaju P, Jaju S. Clinical utility of dental cone-beam computed tomography: current perspectives. CCIDE. Published online April 2014:29. doi:10.2147/ccide.s41621
  13. Alshomrani F. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-Based Diagnosis of Dental Bone Defects. Diagnostics. 2024;14(13):1404. doi:10.3390/diagnostics14131404
  14. Akyalcin S, Schaefer JS, English JD, Stephens CR, Winkelmann S. A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of buccal bone thickness following maxillary expansion. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43(2):85. doi:10.5624/isd.2013.43.2.85
  15. Roemer FW, Engelke K, Li L, Laredo JD, Guermazi A. MRI underestimates presence and size of knee osteophytes using CT as a reference standard. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2023;31(5):656-668. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2023.01.575
  16. Hsu JT, Chang HW, Huang HL, Yu JH, Li YF, Tu MG. Bone density changes around teeth during orthodontic treatment. Clin Oral Invest. 2010;15(4):511-519. doi:10.1007/s00784-010-0410-1
  17. Aranyarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, et al, Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2005;20(3):416-424.
  18. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, et al. Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomo-graphic scanning of the maxillofacial region: an in vitro study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2009;107(3):420-425. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.049
  19. Lee S, Gantes B, Riggs M, et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 3. Bone quality evaluation during osteotomy and implant placement. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2007;22(2):208-212.
  20. Campos MJ da S, de Albuquerque EG, Pinto BCH, et al. The role of orthodontic tooth movement in bone and root mineral density: A study of patients submitted and not submitted to orthodontic treatment. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18(12):CR752-CR757. doi:10.12659/msm.883604
  21. Salimov F, Tatli U, Kürkçü M, Akoğlan M, Öztunç H, Kurtoğlu C. Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values derived from cone beam computed tomography and implant stability parameters: a clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Res. 2013;25(9):1016-1021. doi:10.1111/clr.12219
  22. Alves LD. Angled dental implants: implications for clinical practice and biomechanical considerations. ISJM. 2024;3(1). doi:10.56238/isevmjv3n1-026
  23. Fakhar HB, Abbaszadeh A. Effect of mandibular plane angle on image dimensions in linear tomography. Journal of Dental Medicine. 2011;24(1):42-49.
  24. Lukas C. Modeling the influence of bone mineralization and remodeling on the structure of bone. Published online December 20, 2012. doi:10.18452/16648
  25. Dolgalev AA, Danaev AB, Yusupov RD, Hossain SJ, Gabrielyan RG, Zolotaev KE. Objective assessment of measurement error in significant cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. Medicinskij alfavit. 2022;(7):65-68. doi:10.33667/2078-5631-2022-7-65-68
  26. Petrikowski CG, Pharoah MJ, Schmitt A. Presurgical radiographic assessment for implants. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1989;61(1):59-64. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(89)90110-8
  27. Genisa M, Ahmad Rajion Z, Mohamad D, Pohchi A, Abdul Kadir MR, Shuib S. Effect of Different Angle Scanning on Density Estimation based on Hounsfield Unit on CT and CBCT. JSM. 2015;44(9):1331-1337. doi:10.17576/jsm-2015-4409-16
  28. Hassan TAL, Mohammed HB. Effect of Implant Surface Modification on Bone Mineral Density and Survival Rate in the Maxilla After a Short Period Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2021;33(1):e49-e52. doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000007908
  29. Silva IM de CC, Freitas DQ de, Ambrosano GMB, Bóscolo FN, Almeida SM. Bone density: comparative evaluation of Hounsfield units in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography. Braz oral res. 2012;26(6):550-556. doi:10.1590/s1806-83242012000600011
  30. Servais JA, Gaalaas L, Lunos S, Beiraghi S, Larson BE, Leon-Salazar V. Alternative cone-beam computed tomography method for the analysis of bone density around impacted maxillary canines. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2018;154(3):442-449. doi:10.1016/j. ajodo.2018.01.008
  31. Carr J, Pedagandham SP, Giugni A, et al. Bone mineral density in osseointegration implant surgery: A review of current studies (Review). Biomed Rep. 2024;21(2). doi:10.3892/br.2024.1809
  32. Lerebours C, Weinkamer R, Roschger A, Buenzli PR. Mineral density differences between femoral cortical bone and trabecular bone are not explained by turnover rate alone. Bone Reports. 2020;13:100731. doi:10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100731
  33. Liu J, Chen HY, DoDo H, et al. Efficacy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Evaluating Bone Quality for Optimum Implant Treatment Planning. Implant Dentistry. 2017;26(3):405-411. doi:10.1097/id.0000000000000542
  34. Morar L, Băciuț G, Băciuț M, et al. Analysis of CBCT Bone Density Using the Hounsfield Scale. Prosthesis. 2022;4(3):414-423. doi:10.3390/prosthesis4030033
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2025-0015 | Journal eISSN: 1898-0309 | Journal ISSN: 1425-4689
Language: English
Page range: 141 - 145
Submitted on: Dec 13, 2024
|
Accepted on: Apr 17, 2025
|
Published on: Jun 25, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 May Fadheel Estephan, published by Polish Society of Medical Physics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.