References
- Siiskonen T, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Dabinc J, et al. Establishing the European diagnostic reference levels for interventional cardiology. Phys Med. 2018;54:42-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.09.012
- Ho TL, Shieh SH, Lin CL, Shen WC, Kao CH. Risk of cancer among cardiologists who frequently perform percutaneous coronary interventions: a population-based study. Eur J Clin Invest. 2016;46:527-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12628
- Purohit E, Karimipour D, Madder RD. Multiple cutaneous cancers in an interventional cardiologist: Predominance in unprotected skin nearest the radiation source. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021;28:206-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2021.01.029
- Srimahachota S, Udayachalerm W, Kupharang T, et al. Radiation skin injury caused by percutaneous coronary intervention, report of 3 cases. Int J Cardiol. 2012;154:e31-e33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.05.016
- Lai CC, Wei KC, Chen WY, et al. Risk Factors For Radiation-Induced Skin Ulceration in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of Chronic Total Occluded Lesions: A 2-Year Observational Study. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8408. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08945-4
- Tseng YT, Yu YC, Cheng IN, et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Related Radiation Ulcer: Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention Strategy. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023;39:480-487. https://doi.org/10.6515/acs.202305_39(3).20221219a
- ICRP 2017. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. ICRP Publication 135. Ann ICRP 46(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645317717209
- Aroua A, Rickli H, Stauffer JC, et al. How to set up and apply reference levels in fluoroscopy at a national level. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1621-1633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0463-3
- Bogaert E, Bacher K, Lemmens K, et al. A large-scale multicentre study of patient skin doses in interventional cardiology: dose-area product action levels and dose reference levels. Br J Radiol. 2009;82:303-312. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/29449648
- Hart D, Hillier MC, Wall BF. National reference doses for common radiographic, fluoroscopic and dental X-ray examinations in the UK. Br J Radiol. 2009;82: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/12568539
- Brnić Z, Krpan T, Faj D, et al. Patient radiation doses in the most common interventional cardiology procedures in Croatia: first results. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2010;138:180-186. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncp237
- Miller DL, Hilohi CM, Spelic DC. Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology in the U.S.: Advisory data sets and possible initial values for U.S. reference levels. Med Phys. 2012;39:6276-6286. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4754300
- Zotova R, Vassileva J, Hristova J, Pirinen M, Järvinen H. A national patient dose survey and setting of reference levels for interventional radiology in Bulgaria. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:1240-1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2386-5
- Simantirakis G, Koukorava C, Kalathaki M, et al. Reference levels and patient doses in interventional cardiology procedures in Greece. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:2324-2332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2813-2
- Crowhurst JA, Whitby M, Thiele D, et al. Radiation dose in coronary angiography and intervention: initial results from the establishment of a multi-centre diagnostic reference level in Queensland public hospitals. J Med Radiat Sci. 2014;61:135-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.67
- Säteilyturvakeskus (STUK) Päätös 15/3020/2016. Potilaan säteilyaltistuksen vertailutasot kardiologisessa radiologiassa. Helsinki, Finland, 2016; http://www.stuk.fi/documents/88234/1106801/Decision-15-3020-2015-Reference-levels-for-the-patientsradiation-exposure-20122016.pdf/18940d29-67bb-eb75-66ae-ae037b699779 [retrieved January 22, 2018].
- Georges JL, Belle L, Etard C, et al. Radiation Doses to Patients in Interventional Coronary Procedures—Estimation of Updated National Reference Levels by Dose Audit. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2017;175:17-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw261
- Widmark A. Technical Report: Diagnostic reference level (DRL) in Norway 2017. Results, revision and establishment of new DRL. NRPA Report 2018:3. Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority. Østerås 2018; https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29964.21120
- Kim JS, Lee BK, Ryu DR, et al. A multicentre survey of local diagnostic reference levels and achievable dose for coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention procedures in Korea. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2019;187:378-382. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncz178
- Schegerer A, Loose R, Heuser LJ, Brix G. Diagnostic Reference Levels for Diagnostic and Interventional X-Ray Procedures in Germany: Update and Handling. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2019;191:739-751. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0824-7603
- Pace E, Cortis K, Debono J, Grech M, Caruana CJ. Establishing local and national diagnostic and interventional cardiology and radiology reference levels in a small European state: the case of Malta. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2020;191:261-271. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaa152
- Sánchez R, Vañó E, Fernández Soto JM, et al. Updating national diagnostic reference levels for interventional cardiology and methodological aspects. Phys Med. 2020;70:169-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.01.014
- Subban V, Amelot S, Victor SM, et al. Radiation doses during cardiac catheterisation procedures in India: a multicentre study. Asia Intervention. 2020;6: 25-33. https://doi.org/10.4244/AIJ-D-18-00044
- Yap EML, Magno LP, Macaraeg CA, et al. Radiation dose in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: Establishment of diagnostic reference levels at the Philippine Heart Center. Interv Cardiol Rev. 2021;16:e13. https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2021.16.PO2
- Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA). Diagnostic Reference Levels: Guidance on the establishment, use and review of diagnostic reference levels for medical exposure to ionising radiation. Updated October 2022; https://www.hiqa.ie/sites/default/files/202211/Diagnostic%20Reference%20Levels_Undertaking%20guidance_Oct%202022.pdf
- Srimahachota S, Krisanachinda A, Roongsangmanoon W, et al. Establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in Thailand. Phys Med. 2022;96:46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.02.013
- Smith IR, Rivers JT. Measures of Radiation Exposure in Cardiac Imaging and the Impact of Case Complexity. Heart Lung Circ. 2008;17:224-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2007.10.004
- Miller DL, Balter S, Wagner LK, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for recording patient radiation dose in the medical record. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:423-429. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000126814.97605.C6
- Larrazet F, Dibie A, Philippe F, Palau R, Klausz R, Laborde F. Factors influencing fluoroscopy time and dose-area product values during ad hoc one-vessel percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Brit J Radiol. 2003;76:473-477. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/21553230
- Kuipers G, Delewi R, Velders XL, et al. Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Angiograms Performed by the Radial Compared With the Femoral Route. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5:752-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.03.020
- Delewi R, Hoebers LP, Remunddal T, et al. Clinical and Procedural Characteristics Associated With Higher Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:501-506. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000220
- Faroux L, Blanpain T, Nazeyrollas P, et al. Trends in Patient Exposure to Radiation in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Over a 10-Year Period. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120:927-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.021
- Zanca F, Collard C, Alexandre N, et al. Patient exposure data and operator dose in coronary interventional procedures: Impact of body-mass index and procedure complexity. Phys Med. 2020;76:38-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.05.006
- Koh Y, Vogrin S, Noaman S, et al. Effect of Different Anthropometric Body Indexes on Radiation Exposure in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterisation and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Tomography. 2022;8:2256-2267. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8050189
- Stocker TJ, Abdel-Wahab M, Möllmann H, et al. Trends and predictors of radiation exposure in percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECTION VIII study. EuroIntervention. 2022;18:e324-e332. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00856
- Bernardi G, Padovani R, Morocutti G, et al. Clinical and Technical Determinants of the Complexity of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Procedures: Analysis in Relation to Radiation Exposure Parameters. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;51:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-726X(200009)51:1<1::AID-CCD1>3.0.CO;2-K
- Balter S, Miller DL, Vano E, et al. A pilot study exploring the possibility of establishing guidance levels in x-ray directed interventional procedures. Med Phys. 2008;35:673-680. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2829868
- Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronaryangioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). Circulation. 1988;78:486-502. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.78.2.486
- Fetterly KA, Lennon RJ, Bell MR, Holmes DR Jr, Rihal CS. Clinical determinants of radiation dose in percutaneous coronary interventional procedures: influence of patient size, procedure complexity, and performing physician. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:336-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.014
- Jarvinen H, Farah J, Siiskonen T, et al. Feasibility of setting up generic alert levels for maximum skin dose in fluoroscopically guided procedures. Phys Med. 2018;46:67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.01.010
- Neill J, Douglas H, Richardson G, et al. Comparison of Radiation Dose and the Effect of Operator Experience in Femoral and Radial Arterial Access for Coronary Procedures. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:936-940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.002
- Verdoia M, Pipan P, Viola O, et al. Impact of Different Measures of Body Size on the Radiation Dose During Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results from a Large Single Center Cohort. Angiology. 2022;73:478-484. https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197211053133
- Saunamaki KI. Radiation protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: special focus on the role of the operator. Interv Cardiol. 2010;2:667-672. https://doi.org/10.2217/ica.10.63
- Sadick V, Reed W, Collins L, Sadick N, Heard R, Robinson J. Impact of biplane versus single-plane imaging on radiation dose, contrast load and procedural time in coronary angioplasty. Brit J Radiol. 2010;83:379-393. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/21696839
- Georges JL, Livarek B, Gibault-Genty G, et al.Reduction of radiation delivered to patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures. Effect of a programme for dose reduction based on radiation-protection training. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;102:821-827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2009.09.007
- Roongsangmanoon W, Srimahachota S, Krisanachinda A, Rehani M. Radiation doses to patients in coronary interventions in a hospital in Thailand. Asian Biomed. 2012;6:565-571.
- Fazel R, Curtis J, Wang Y, et al. Determinants of Fluoroscopy Time for Invasive Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from the NCDR®. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:1091-1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.24996
- Nikolsky E, Pucelikova T, Mehran R, et al. An evaluation of fluoroscopy time and correlation with outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2007;19:208-213.
- Chon MK, Chun KJ, Lee DS, et al. Radiation reduction during percutaneous coronary intervention: A new protocol with a low frame rate and selective fluoroscopic image storage. Medicine. 2017;96:30(e7517). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007517
- Bousis C, Kosovitsas T, Karanikis P, Kotsia A, Tzima E, Pappa E. Dose area product reduction through a practice implementing low frame rate fluoroscopy and increased collimation during single vessel percutaneous coronary interventions. Radiat Prot Environ. 2024; 47:121-128. https://doi.org/10.4103/rpe.rpe_13_24
- Boland JE, Wang LW, Love BJ, Wynne DG, Muller DWM. Radiation dose during percutaneous treatment of structural heart disease. Heart Lung Circ. 2014;23:1075-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2014.04.258
- Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2009;157:132-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.023
- Delichas MG, Psarrakos K, Hadjiioannou K, et al. The dependence of patient dose on factors relating to the technique and complexity of Interventional Cardiology procedures. Phys Med. 2005;21:153-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1120-1797(05)80004-3
- Üreyen CM, Coşansu K, Vural MG, et al. Is trans-radial approach related to an increased risk of radiation exposure in patients who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention? (The SAKARYA study). Anatol J Cardiol. 2019;22:5-12. https://doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2019.06013