Hippocampus, spare or not to spare? Normal Tissue Complication Probability considerations

Mężeński, Piotr; Peszyńska-Piorun, Magdalena

doi:10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0022

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to use the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model to calculate and compare neurocognitive function (NCF) impairment in the two types of dose distributions in Volumetric Arc Whole-brain radiotherapy (VMAT WBRT).

Methods: The total dose prescribed to the Planning Target Volume (PTV) was 25 Gy and 30 Gy in 10 fractions. During the optimization of the Volumetric Arc Therapy Hippocampal-Avoidant WBRT (VMAT HA-WBRT) plan, the left and right hippocampus the D₁₀₀ < 9 Gy, and the point dose D_max < 16 Gy were minimalized based on RTOG0933 criteria. As an alternative 59 plans for non-hippocampus sparing, 25 Gy, and 59 plans for 30 Gy VMAT WBRT plans were prepared. To calculate the probability of NCF impairment, the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) normal tissue complication probability model was used.

Results: The probability of NCF impairment in the HA-WBRT VMAT was equal to 38%, and it was significantly lower compared to 90% in the 25 Gy WBRT VMAT and 97% in the 30 Gy WBRT VMAT (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The probability of NCF impairment was 51-59 percentage points lower in VMAT HA-WBRT compared to VMAT WBRT plans. To achieve a 5% probability of NCF impairment, the D₄₀ value should be reduced to a value of approximately 1 Gy. However, due to the complicated nature and types of NFC impairment, further analysis and strategies are needed to optimize dose distribution.

References

Gondi V, Tolakanahalli R, Mehta MP, et al. Hippocampal-Sparing Whole-Brain Radiotherapy: A “How-To” Technique Using Helical Tomotherapy and Linear Accelerator–Based Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2010;78(4):1244-1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.039
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marsh JC, Gielda BT, Herskovic AM, Abrams RA. Cognitive Sparing during the Administration of Whole Brain Radiotherapy and Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation: Current Concepts and Approaches. Journal of Oncology. 2010;2010:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/198208
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pokhrel D, Sood S, McClinton C, et al. Treatment planning strategy for whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing and simultaneous integrated boost for multiple brain metastases using intensity-modulated arc therapy. Medical Dosimetry. 2016;41(4):315-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2016.08.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tallet AV, Azria D, Barlesi F, et al. Neurocognitive function impairment after whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases: actual assessment. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717x-7-77
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Harth S, Abo-Madyan Y, Zheng L, et al. Estimation of intracranial failure risk following hippocampal-sparing whole brain radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2013;109(1):152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.09.009
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ahmad S, Kendall E, Algan O. Comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy for whole brain hippocampal sparing treatment plans based on radiobiological modeling. J Med Phys. 2018;43(1):16. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_85_17
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gondi V, Pugh SL, Tome WA, et al. Preservation of Memory With Conformal Avoidance of the Hippocampal Neural Stem-Cell Compartment During Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases (RTOG 0933): A Phase II Multi-Institutional Trial. JCO. 2014;32(34):3810-3816. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.57.2909
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deasy JO. Comments on the use of the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model to describe tissue response to nonuniform irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2000;47(5):1458-1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00500-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kutcher GJ, Burman C. Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: The effective volume method gerald. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 1989;16(6):1623-1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(89)90972-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Källman P, Ågren A, Brahme A. Tumour and Normal Tissue Responses to Fractionated Non-uniform Dose Delivery. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 1992;62(2):249-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553009214552071
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Langendijk JA, Lambin P, De Ruysscher D, Widder J, Bos M, Verheij M. Selection of patients for radiotherapy with protons aiming at reduction of side effects: The model-based approach. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2013;107(3):267-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.05.007
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gondi V, Hermann BP, Mehta MP, Tomé WA. Hippocampal Dosimetry Predicts Neurocognitive Function Impairment After Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Benign or Low-Grade Adult Brain Tumors. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2012;83(4):e487-e493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.021
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hacker VL, Jones C. Detecting feigned impairment with the word list recognition of the Wechsler Memory Scale–3rd edition. Brain Injury. 2009;23(3):243-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050902748315
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kazda T, Jancalek R, Pospisil P, et al. Why and how to spare the hippocampus during brain radiotherapy: the developing role of hippocampal avoidance in cranial radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717x-9-139
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tofilon PJ, Fike JR. The Radioresponse of the Central Nervous System: A Dynamic Process. Radiation Research. 2000;153(4):357-370. https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2000153[0357:trotcn]2.0.co;2)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Merchant TE, Kiehna EN, Kun LE, et al. Phase II trial of conformal radiation therapy for pediatric patients with craniopharyngioma and correlation of surgical factors and radiation dosimetry with change in cognitive function. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2006;104(2):94-102. https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2006.104.2.5
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hsiao KY, Yeh SA, Chang CC, Tsai PC, Wu JM, Gau JS. Cognitive Function Before and After Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Prospective Study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2010;77(3):722-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.080
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marks LB, Yorke ED, Jackson A, et al. Use of Normal Tissue Complication Probability Models in the Clinic. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2010;76(3):S10-S19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1754
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lawrence YR, Li XA, el Naqa I, et al. Radiation Dose–Volume Effects in the Brain. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2010;76(3):S20-S27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.091
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marsh JC, Godbole R, Diaz AZ, Gielda BT, Turian JV. Sparing of the hippocampus, limbic circuit and neural stem cell compartment during partial brain radiotherapy for glioma: A dosimetric feasibility study. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology. 2011;55(4):442-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02282.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mayo C, Yorke E, Merchant TE. Radiation Associated Brainstem Injury. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2010;76(3):S36-S41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.078
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mayo C, Martel MK, Marks LB, Flickinger J, Nam J, Kirkpatrick J. Radiation Dose–Volume Effects of Optic Nerves and Chiasm. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2010;76(3):S28-S35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1753
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Acharya MM, Lan ML, Kan VH, et al. Consequences of ionizing radiation-induced damage in human neural stem cells. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2010;49(12):1846-1855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.08.021
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eriksson PS, Perfilieva E, Björk-Eriksson T, et al. Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med. 1998;4(11):1313-1317. https://doi.org/10.1038/3305
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barani IJ, Benedict SH, Lin PS. Neural Stem Cells: Implications for the Conventional Radiotherapy of Central Nervous System Malignancies. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2007;68(2):324-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.033
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Niyazi M, Andratschke N, Bendszus M, et al. ESTRO-EANO guideline on target delineation and radiotherapy details for glioblastoma. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2023;184:109663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109663
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Hippocampus, spare or not to spare? Normal Tissue Complication Probability considerations

Abstract

Paradigm

My account