Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Insights into patient awareness and preferences in medical imaging procedures involving ionizing radiation Cover

Insights into patient awareness and preferences in medical imaging procedures involving ionizing radiation

Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering
Volume 30 (2024): Issue 3 (September 2024)
By: Stanislava Mavrodinova and  Yanita Chernogorova  
Open Access
|Sep 2024

References

  1. Abalo KD, Rage E, Leuraud K, et al. Early life ionizing radiation exposure and cancer risks: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatric Radiology. 2020;51(1):45-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04803-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Buchberger B, Scholl K, Krabbe L, Spiller L, Lux B. Radiation exposure by medical X-ray applications: Strahlenbelastung durch Röntgenanwendung in der Medizin. GMS German Medical Science. 2022;20:1-8. https://doi.org/10.3205/000308
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Kidoń J, Polaczek-Grelik K, Wojciuch L. Local diagnostic reference levels and effective doses: single institution levels for interventional cardiology procedures for adult patients. Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering. 2022;28(2):77-83. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2022-0009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Annals of the ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Editorial. Annals of the ICRP. 2007;37(6):3-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2008.08.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Wrixon AD. New ICRP recommendations. Journal of Radiological Protection. 2008;28(2):161-168. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/28/2/r02
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Preston DL, Shimizu Y, Pierce DA, Suyama A, Mabuchi K. Studies of Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors. Report 13: Solid Cancer and Noncancer Disease Mortality: 1950–1997. Radiation Research. 2003;160(4):381-407. https://doi.org/10.1667/rr3049
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Cléro E, Vaillant L, Hamada N, et al. History of radiation detriment and its calculation methodology used in ICRP Publication 103. Journal of Radiological Protection. 2019;39(3):R19-R36. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ab294a
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. ICRP Publication 152: Radiation Detriment Calculation Methodology. Annals of the ICRP. 2022;51(3):9-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466453221080101
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Cho K-W, Cantone M-C, Kurihara-Saio C, et al. ICRP Publication 138: Ethical Foundations of the System of Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP. 2018;47(1):1-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645317746010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Bastiani L, Paolicchi F, Faggioni L, et al. Patient Perceptions and Knowledge of Ionizing Radiation From Medical Imaging. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(10):e2128561-e2128561. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28561
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Ria F, Bergantin A, Vai A, et al. Awareness of medical radiation exposure among patients: A patient survey as a first step for effective communication of ionizing radiation risks. Physica Medica. 2017;43:57-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.10.014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Rehani MM, Nacouzi D. Higher patient doses through X-ray imaging procedures. Physica Medica. 2020;79:80-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Vassileva J, Holmberg O. Radiation protection perspective to recurrent medical imaging: what is known and what more is needed? The British Journal of Radiology. 2021;94(1126):20210477. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210477
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Pankowski P, Małgorzata Wrzesień. Analysis of the frequency and type of CT examinations performed in Poland in 2022. Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering. 2024;30(1):11-17. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Zeng Y, Wan Y, Yuan Z, Fang Y. Healthcare-Seeking Behavior among Chinese Older Adults: Patterns and Predictive Factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(6):2969. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062969
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Morrison KE, Colón-González FJ, Morbey RA, et al. Demographic and socioeconomic patterns in healthcare-seeking behaviour for respiratory symptoms in England: a comparison with non-respiratory symptoms and between three healthcare services. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):e038356. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038356
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Frane N, Bitterman A. Radiation Safety and Protection. PubMed. Published May 23, 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557499/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Takakuwa KM, Estepa AT, Shofer FS. Knowledge and Attitudes of Emergency Department Patients Regarding Radiation Risk of CT: Effects of Age, Sex, Race, Education, Insurance, Body Mass Index, Pain, and Seriousness of Illness. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2010;195(5):1151-1158. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.09.3847
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Alrasheed AA, Alammar AM. What Patients Want to Know About CT Radiation Exposure Harm and What Doctors Actually Tell Them: A Gap in Patient-Doctor Communication. Research Square (Research Square). Published online February 19, 2024. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3956987/v1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Glaser J, Nouri S, Fernandez A, et al. Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review. Medical Decision Making. 2020;40(2):0272989X1989634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x19896348
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Silbert BS, Scott DA. Informed Consent in Patients With Frailty Syndrome. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2020;130(6):1474-1481. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000004629
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Picano E. Informed consent and communication of risk from radiological and nuclear medicine examinations: how to escape from a communication inferno. BMJ. 2004;329(7470):849-851. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7470.849
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Brink JA, Goske MJ, Patti JA. Informed Decision Making Trumps Informed Consent for Medical Imaging with Ionizing Radiation. Radiology. 2012;262(1):11-14. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11111421
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Davies EM, Bridges AJ, Chung EM. Does radiology require informed consent for radiation risk? The British Journal of Radiology. 2021;94(1127). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210620
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Varkey B. Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice. Medical Principles and Practice. 2020;30(1):17-28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. O’Keefe K. An exploration of radiographer decision-making regarding rejected or sub-optimal plain x-ray images. eprints.qut.edu.au. Published February 28, 2023. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/238332/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Mettler FA, Mahesh M, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, et al. Patient Exposure from Radiologic and Nuclear Medicine Procedures in the United States: Procedure Volume and Effective Dose for the Period 2006–2016. Radiology. 2020;295(2):418-427. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020192256
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Brambilla M, Vassileva J, Kuchcinska A, Rehani MM. Multinational data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent radiological procedures: call for action. European Radiology. 2019;30(5):2493-2501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06528-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Martin CJ, Harrison JD, Rehani MM. Effective dose from radiation exposure in medicine: Past, present, and future. Physica Medica. 2020;79:87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.020
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0013 | Journal eISSN: 1898-0309 | Journal ISSN: 1425-4689
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 108 - 119
Submitted on: Mar 25, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 15, 2024
Published on: Sep 5, 2024
Published by: Polish Society of Medical Physics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
radiation protection,
X-ray imaging,
patient awareness
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Biomedical engineering,
Physics,
Technical and applied physics,
Medical physics

© 2024 Stanislava Mavrodinova, Yanita Chernogorova, published by Polish Society of Medical Physics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 30 (2024): Issue 3 (September 2024)Next article