Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Automation of slice thickness measurements in computed tomography images of AAPM CT performance phantom using a non-rotational method Cover

Automation of slice thickness measurements in computed tomography images of AAPM CT performance phantom using a non-rotational method

Open Access
|Aug 2022

References

  1. 1. Kalender WA. X-ray computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(13):R29-R43. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/13/r03
  2. 2. Aweda MA, Arogundade RA. Patient dose reduction methods in computerized tomography procedures: A review. Int J Phys Sci. 2007;2(1):1-9.10.9734/PSIJ/2017/30833
  3. 3. Anam C, Budi WS, Haryanto F, Fujibuchi T, Dougherty G. A novel multiple-windows blending of CT images in red-green-blue (RGB) color space: Phantoms study. Scientific Visualization. 2019;11(5):56-69. https://doi.org/10.26583/sv.11.5.06
  4. 4. Mansour Z, Mokhtar A, Sarhan A, Ahmed MT, El-Diasty T. Quality control of CT image using American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2016;47(4):1665-1671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2016.08.016
  5. 5. Elnour H, Hassan HA, Mustafa A, Osman H, Alamri S, Yasen A. Assessment of Image Quality Parameters for Computed Tomography in Sudan. Open Journal of Radiology. 2017;7(1):75-84. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojrad.2017.71009
  6. 6. Ford JM, Decker SJ. Computed tomography slice thickness and its effects on three dimensional reconstruction of anatomical structures. Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging. 2016;4:43-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2015.10.004
  7. 7. Vermiglio G, Acri G, Testagrossa B, Causa F, Tripepi M. Procedures for evaluation of slice thickness in medical imaging systems. In: Eldin AB, editor. Modern Approaches To Quality Control. IntechOpen, London; 2011:383-404. https://doi.org/10.5772/23693
  8. 8. Makmur IWA, Setiabudi W, Anam C. Evaluasi ketebalan irisan (slice thickness) pada pesawat CT-scan single slice. Jurnal Sains dan Matematika. 2013;21:42-47.
  9. 9. Morsbach F, Zhang YH, Martin L, Lindqvist C, Brismar T. Body composition evaluation with computed tomography: Contrast media and slice thickness cause methodological errors. Nutrition. 2019;59:50-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2018.08.00130419500
  10. 10. McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, McNitt-Gray MF, et al. The phantom portion of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Computed Tomography (CT) accreditation program. Practical tips, artifact, example, and pitfalls to avoid. Med Phys 2004;31(9):2423-2442. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.176963215487722
  11. 11. An HJ, Son J, Jin H, Sung J, Chun M. Acceptance test and clinical commissioning of CT simulator. Progress in Medical Physics. 2019;30(4):160-166. https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2019.30.4.160
  12. 12. Husby E, Svendsen ED, Andersen HK, Martinsen ACT. 100 days with scans of the same Catphan phantom on the same CT scanner. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18(6):224-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12186568991428921910
  13. 13. Sofiyatun S, Anam C, Zahro UM, Rukmana DA, Dougherty G. An automated measurement of image slice thickness of computed tomography. Atom Indonesia. 2021;47(2):121-128. https://doi.org/10.17146/aij.2021.1111
  14. 14. Lasiyah N, Anam C, Hidayanto E, Dougherty G. Automated procedure for slice thickness verification of computed tomography images: Variations of slice thickness, position from iso-center and reconstruction filter. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021;22(7):313-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13317829268734109738
  15. 15. Widyanti ER, Anam C, Hidayanto E, Haekal M. The impact of noise on the results of automated slice sensitivity profile measurements in computed tomography. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies. 2021;26(2):657-663. https://doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v26.2.3110
  16. 16. Anam C. Types of statistical tests for analysis of research results. Berkala Fisika. 23(4):115-117.
  17. 17. Sunardi H, Zulkifli Z, Antony F. Geometric transformation of rotation of digital imagery to obtain optimal compression using lossless and lossy methods (In Bahasa Indonesia). Jurnal Informatika Global. 2021;12(1):15-22.
  18. 18. International Atomic Energy Agency. Quality assurance programme for computed tomography: Diagnostic and therapy applications, IAEA-Human health series No. 19. IAEA, Vienna; 2012.
  19. 19. Greene TC, Rong XJ. Evaluation of techniques for slice sensitivity profile measurement and analysis. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15(2):281-294. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4042587547524710429
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2022-0016 | Journal eISSN: 1898-0309 | Journal ISSN: 1425-4689
Language: English
Page range: 133 - 138
Submitted on: May 12, 2022
Accepted on: Jul 21, 2022
Published on: Aug 23, 2022
Published by: Polish Society of Medical Physics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Angelita D Ximenes, Choirul Anam, Eko Hidayanto, Ariij Naufal, Dito A Rukmana, Geoff Dougherty, published by Polish Society of Medical Physics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.