Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Normal tissue objective (NTO) tool in Eclipse treatment planning system for dose distribution optimization Cover

Normal tissue objective (NTO) tool in Eclipse treatment planning system for dose distribution optimization

Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. 1. Miranda-Filho A, Piñeros M, Soerjomataram I, Deltour I, Bray F. Cancers of the brain and CNS: global patterns and trends in incidence. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(2):270-280. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/now166.546429227571887
  2. 2. National Brain Tumor Society. Current treatments for brain tumors. Natl. Brain Tumor Soc. 2017. Accessed from National brain tumor society. Current Treatments for Brain Tumors. https://braintumor.org/wp-content/assets/2017_NBTS_CurrentTreatmentOptions_083017.Pdf
  3. 3. Anam C, Soejoko DS, Haryanto F, Yani S, Dougherty G. Electron contamination for 6 MV photon beams from an Elekta linac: Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of Physics and Its Applications. 2020;2(2):97-101. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpa.v2i2.7771
  4. 4. Rusthoven KE, Pugh TJ. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for inoperable lung cancer. JAMA. 2010;303(23):2354-2355. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.77720551403
  5. 5. Lorentini S, Amelio D, Giri MG, et al. IMRT or 3D-CRT in glioblastoma? A dosimetric criterion for patient selection. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013;12(5):411-420. https://doi.org/10.7785/tcrt.2012.50034
  6. 6. Dunlop A, Welsh L, McQuaid D, et al. Brain-sparing methods for IMRT of head and neck cancer. PloS One. 2015;10(3):e0120141. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120141436453625781636
  7. 7. Herman TDLF, Ahmad S, Vlachaki MT. Intensity modulated radiation therapy versus three dimensional conformal radiation therapy for treatment of high grade glioma: a radiobiological modeling study. J Xray Sci Technol. 2010;18(4):393-402. https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-2010-027021045276
  8. 8. Yani S, Budiansah I, Pratama SH, Rhani MF, Anam C, Haryanto F. Evaluation of the dosimetric characteristics of 10 MV flattened and unflattened photon beams in a heterogeneous phantom. Int J Radiat Res. 2021;19(4):835-841. https://doi.org/10.29242/ijrr.19.4.835
  9. 9. Corkum MT, Mitchell S, Venkatesan V, Read N, Warner A, Palma DA. Does 5 + 5 equal better radiation treatment plans in head and neck cancers? Advances in Radiation Oncology. 2019;4(4):683-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.06.001681753331673661
  10. 10. Xhaferllari I, Wong E, Bzdusek K, Lock M, Chen JZ. Automated IMRT planning with regional optimization using planning scripts. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14(1):176-191. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.4052571404823318393
  11. 11. Wang D, Denittis A, Hu Y. Strategies to optimize stereotactic radiosurgery plans for brain tumors with volumetric-modulated arc therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020;21(3):45-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12818707538732043810
  12. 12. Jiménez-Puertas S, Sánchez-Artuñedo D, Hermida-López M. Assessment of the Monitor Unit Objective tool for VMAT in the Eclipse treatment planning system. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018;23(2):121-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2018.02.001
  13. 13. Fogliata A, Reggiori G, Stravato A, et al. RapidPlan head and neck model: The objectives and possible clinical benefit. Radiat Oncol. 2017;12(1):73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0808-x
  14. 14. Fogliata A, Thompson S, Stravato A, Tomtis S, Scorsetti M, Cozzi L. On the gEUD biological optimization objective for organs at risk in Photon Optimizer of Eclipse treatment planning system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19(1):106-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12224
  15. 15. Varian Medical System. Eclipse photon and electron algorithms reference guide. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. 2015. 3100 Hansen Way Palo Alto, CA 94304-1038 United States of America
  16. 16. Marks LB, Yorke ED, Jackson A, et al. Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3):S10-S19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1754
  17. 17. Antero AJ, Marika PK. Spatially-variant normal tissue objective for radiotherapy. Varian Medical Systems Int Ag (Ch). 2013; EP2038010. https://www.freepatentsonline.com/EP2038010B1.html
  18. 18. Cao T, Dai Z, Ding Z, Li W, Quan H. Analysis of different evaluation indexes for prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy plans: conformity index, homogeneity index and gradient index. Precision Radiation Oncology. 2019;3(3):72-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro6.1072
  19. 19. Lomax NJ, Scheib SG. Quantifying the degree of conformity in radiosurgery treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55(5):1409-1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(02)04599-6
  20. 20. Shaw E, Kline R, Gillin M, et al. Radiation therapy oncology group: Radiosurgery quality assurance guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;27(5):1231-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(93)90548-A
  21. 21. Paddick I, Lippitz B. A simple dose gradient measurement tool to complement the conformity index. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:194-201. https://doi.org/10.3171/sup.2006.105.7.19418503356
  22. 22. Ohtakara K, Hayashi S, Hoshi H. Dose gradient analyses in linac-based intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery using paddick’s gradient index: Consideration of the optimal method for plan evaluation. J Radiat Res. 2011;52(5):592-599. https://doi.org/10.1269/jrr.1100521768752
  23. 23. Sheng, K., Molloyb, J. A., Larnera, J. M., Reada P. W., 2007, A dosimetric comparison of non-coplanar IMRT versus Helical Tomotherapy for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer, Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 82(2), pp. 174-178, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.01.00817275112
  24. 24. Rosenwald JC, Gaboriaud G, Pontvert D. La radiothhrapie conformationnelle principes et classification. Cancer/Radiothérapie. 1999;3(5):367-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1278-3218(00)87975-5
  25. 25. Shaw E, Scott C, Souhami L, et al. Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47(2):291-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00507-6
  26. 26. Caldeira A, Trinca WC, Flores TP, et al. The influence of normal tissue objective in the treatment of prostate cancer. J Med Imag Radiat Sci. 2020;51(2):312-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2020.02.00632327305
  27. 27. Bell J P, Patel P, Higgins K, McDonald MW, Roper J. Fine-tuning the normal tissue objective in Eclipse for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. Med Dosim.2018;43(4):344-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2017.11.00429277249
  28. 28. Xu L, Xu Y, Chen X, Xie X, Liang B, Dai J. A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(11):50-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12739683936531605454
  29. 29. Blonigen BJ, Steinmetz RD, Levin L, et al. Irradiated volume as a predictor of brain radionecrosis after linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77(4):996-1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.00619783374
  30. 30. Ernst-Stecken A, Ganslandt O, Lambrecht U, Sauer R, Grabenbauer G. Phase II trial of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: results and toxicity. Radiother Oncol. 2006;81(1):18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2006.08.02416978720
  31. 31. Gong Y, Wang J, Bai S, Jiang X, Xu F. Conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT): A safe and effective treatment for cancer spinal metastasis. Radiat Oncol. 2008;3(11):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-3-11237379218426607
  32. 32. Eric JH. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, protons, and the risk of second cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.02716618572
  33. 33. Kry SF, Salehpour M, Followill DS, et al. The calculated risk of fatal secondary malignancies from intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62(4):1195-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.05315990025
  34. 34. Van Timmeren JE, Ehrbar S, Chamberlain M, et al. Single-isocenter versus multiple-isocenters for multiple lung metastases: evaluation of lung dose. Radiother Oncol. 2022;166:189-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.03034864135
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2022-0012 | Journal eISSN: 1898-0309 | Journal ISSN: 1425-4689
Language: English
Page range: 99 - 106
Submitted on: Dec 28, 2021
Accepted on: May 11, 2022
Published on: Jun 21, 2022
Published by: Polish Society of Medical Physics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Liza Indrayani, Choirul Anam, Heri Sutanto, Rinarto Subroto, Geoff Dougherty, published by Polish Society of Medical Physics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.