Dosimetric impact of FFF over FF beam using VMAT for brain neoplasms treated with radiotherapy

Manna, Sumanta; Kombathula, Sri Harsha; Gayen, Sanjib; Varshney, Sonal; Pareek, Puneet

doi:10.2478/pjmpe-2021-0023

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to assess the dosimetric impact of FFF beam plans on high-grade brain neoplasms using the VMAT technique when compared with FF beam plans.

Material and Methods: Thirty patients with high-grade brain neoplasms, who had received radiotherapy using VMAT technique retrospectively were selected for this study. All the patients were planned for VMAT using 6MV_FF beam and the same plan was re-optimized using 6MV_FFF beam keeping the same dose constraint. Radiotherapy dose distribution on planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR), target conformity index (CI), Homogeneity Index (HI), Low dose volume in the patient (V₅, V₁₀, V₂₀, and V₃₀), and Integral dose to the whole body in both plans were compared.

Results: The PTV coverage and OAR’s showed no significant differences in dose distribution between the FFF and FF beam VMAT planning. There was a reduction of the average maximum dose in the right eye, left eye, right optic nerve, and left optic nerve using FFF beams. The reduction in average low dose volume was observed in V₅, V₁₀, V₂₀, V₃₀, and Mean Dose. Also, a significant reduction was observed in the integral dose to the whole body using the FFF beam.

Conclusions: Using FFF beams with VMAT is doable for the treatment of high-grade brain neoplasms, and the delivery mode of the FFF beam in VMAT may yield similar results to FF beam which should be confirmed in a large scale prospective clinical trial.

References

1. Fazekas JT. Treatment of grades I and II brain astrocytomas. the role of radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 1977;2(7-8):661-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(77)90045-110.1016/0360-3016(77)90045-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Stupp R, Weller M, Belanger K, et al. Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352(10):987-96. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa04333010.1056/NEJMoa043330
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. The Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1023-1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-310.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Wagner D, Christiansen H, Wolff H, Vorwerk H. Radiotherapy of malignant gliomas: Comparison of volumetric single arc technique (RapidArc), dynamic intensity-modulated technique and 3D conformal technique. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2009;93(3):593-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2009.10.00210.1016/j.radonc.2009.10.00219897266
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Hrbacek J, Lang S, Klöck S. Commissioning of Photon Beams of a Flattening Filter-Free Linear Accelerator and the Accuracy of Beam Modeling Using an Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2011;80(4):1228-1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.05010.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.05021129855
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Georg D, Knöös T, McClean B. Current status and future perspective of flattening filter free photon beams. Med Phys. 2011; 38 (3):15. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.355464310.1118/1.355464321520840
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Kry SF, Vassiliev ON, Mohan R. Out-of-field photon dose following removal of the flattening filter from a medical accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(8):2155-2166. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/8/00310.1088/0031-9155/55/8/00320305334
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Gasic D, Ohlhues L, Brodin NP, et al. A treatment planning and delivery comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with or without flattening filter for gliomas, brain metastases, prostate, head/neck and early stage lung cancer. Acta Oncologica. 2014;53(8):1005-1011. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2014.92557810.3109/0284186X.2014.92557824937551
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Baic B, Kozłowska B, Kwiatkowski R, Dybek M. Clinical advantages of using unflattened 6-MV and 10-MV photon beams generated by the medical accelerator Elekta Versa HD based on their dosimetric parameters in comparison to conventional beams. Nukleonika. 2019;64(3):77-86. https://doi.org/10.2478/nuka-2019-001010.2478/nuka-2019-0010
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Spruijt KH, Dahele M, Cuijpers JP, et al. Flattening Filter Free vs Flattened Beams for Breast Irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2013;85(2):506-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.04010.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.04022672750
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Treutwein M, Hipp M, Koelbl O, Dobler B. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning for prostate cancer with flattened beam and flattening filter free linear accelerators. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18(5):307-314. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.1216810.1002/acm2.12168
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Tamilarasu S, Saminathan M, Sharma S, Pahuja A, Dewan A. Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19(3). https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.3.639
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. ICRU Report 50: Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy; International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). Journal of the ICRU. 1993;os-26(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru_os26.1.iii10.1093/jicru_os26.1.iii
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. ICRU Report 62: Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy (Supplement to ICRU Report 50); International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). Journal of the ICRU. 1999;os-32(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru_os32.1.iii10.1093/jicru_os32.1.iii
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Niyazi M, Brada M, Chalmers AJ, et al. ESTRO-ACROP guideline “target delineation of glioblastomas.” Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2016;118(1):35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.12.00310.1016/j.radonc.2015.12.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. London Cancer Brain and Spine Pathway Board Neuro-oncology Guidelines, May 2014 (http://www.londoncancer.org/media/84343/london-cancer-neuro-oncology-radiotherapy-guidelines-2013-final-v1-0.pdf)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Eekers DB, in ’t Ven L, Roelofs E, et al. The EPTN consensus-based atlas for CT- and MR-based contouring in neuro-oncology. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2018;128(1):37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2017.12.01310.1016/j.radonc.2017.12.013
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Xiao Y, Kry SF, Popple R, et al. Flattening filter-free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2015;16(3):12-29. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.521910.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5219
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Meshram MN, Pramanik S, Ranjith CP, Gopal SK, Dobhal R. Dosimetric properties of equivalent-quality flattening filter-free (FFF) and flattened photon beams of Versa HD linear accelerator. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2016;17(3):358-370. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.617310.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6173
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. ICRU Report 83: Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon-Beam Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT); International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). Journal of the ICRU. 2010;10(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru_ndq00110.1093/jicru_ndq001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Wu Q, Mohan R, Morris M, Lauve A, Schmidt-Ullrich R. Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas. I: dosimetric results. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2003;56(2):573-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(02)04617-510.1016/S0360-3016(02)04617-5
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Riet A van’t, Mak ACA, Moerland MA, Elders LH, van der Zee W. A conformation number to quantify the degree of conformality in brachytherapy and external beam irradiation: Application to the prostate. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 1997;37(3):731-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00601-310.1016/S0360-3016(96)00601-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Aoyama H, Westerly DC, Mackie TR, et al. Integral radiation dose to normal structures with conformal external beam radiation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2006;64(3):962-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.00510.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.00516458781
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Sun W, Chen L, Yang X, Wang B, Deng X, Huang X. Comparison of treatment plan quality of VMAT for esophageal carcinoma with: flattening filter beam versus flattening filter free beam. J Cancer. 2018;9(18):3263-3268. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.2604410.7150/jca.26044616069230271485
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Reggiori G, Mancosu P, Castiglioni S, et al. Can volumetric modulated arc therapy with flattening filter free beams play a role in stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver lesions? A volume-based analysis: SBRT with FFF VMAT for liver metastasis. Med Phys. 2012;39(2):1112-1118. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.367985810.1118/1.367985822320821
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Lang S, Shrestha B, Graydon S, et al. Clinical application of flattening filter free beams for extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2013;106(2):255-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2012.12.01210.1016/j.radonc.2012.12.01223395063
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Dang TM, Peters MJ, Hickey B, Semciw A. Efficacy of flattening-filter-free beam in stereotactic body radiation therapy planning and treatment: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017;61(3):379-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.1258310.1111/1754-9485.1258328116813
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Jia F, Xu D, Yue H, Wu H, Li G. Comparison of Flattening Filter and Flattening Filter-Free Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:8500-8505. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.91021810.12659/MSM.910218627672130472719
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Ong CL, Dahele M, Cuijpers JP, Senan S, Slotman BJ, Verbakel WFAR. Dosimetric Impact of Intrafraction Motion During RapidArc Stereotactic Vertebral Radiation Therapy Using Flattened and Flattening Filter-Free Beams. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2013;86(3):420-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.12.02810.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.12.02823523183
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Kragl G, af Wetterstedt S, Knäusl B, et al. Dosimetric characteristics of 6 and 10MV unflattened photon beams. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2009;93(1):141-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2009.06.00810.1016/j.radonc.2009.06.00819592123
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Titt U, Vassiliev ON, Pönisch F, Dong L, Liu H, Mohan R. A flattening filter free photon treatment concept evaluation with Monte Carlo: FFF Monte Carlo simulation. Med Phys. 2006;33(6Part1):1595-1602. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.219832710.1118/1.219832716872067
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Lechner W, Kragl G, Georg D. Evaluation of treatment plan quality of IMRT and VMAT with and without flattening filter using Pareto optimal fronts. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2013;109(3):437-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.09.02010.1016/j.radonc.2013.09.02024183067
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Vassiliev ON, Titt U, Pönisch F, Kry SF, Mohan R, Gillin MT. Dosimetric properties of photon beams from a flattening filter free clinical accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(7):1907-1917. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/7/01910.1088/0031-9155/51/7/01916552113
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Sun W, Chen L, Yang X, Wang B, Deng X, Huang X. Comparison of treatment plan quality of VMAT for esophageal carcinoma with: flattening filter beam versus flattening filter free beam. J Cancer. 2018;9(18):3263-3268. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.2604410.7150/jca.26044616069230271485
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. Ong CL, Dahele M, Cuijpers JP, Senan S, Slotman BJ, Verbakel WFAR. Dosimetric Impact of Intrafraction Motion During RapidArc Stereotactic Vertebral Radiation Therapy Using Flattened and Flattening Filter-Free Beams. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2013;86(3):420-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.12.02810.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.12.02823523183
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. Sørensen BS, Vestergaard A, Overgaard J, Præstegaard LH. Dependence of cell survival on instantaneous dose rate of a linear accelerator. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2011;101(1):223-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.06.01810.1016/j.radonc.2011.06.01821737168
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
37. Nakano H, Minami K, Yagi M, et al. Radiobiological effects of flattening filter–free photon beams on A549 non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Journal of Radiation Research. 2018;59(4):442-445. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rry04110.1093/jrr/rry041605421629850845
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
38. King RB, Hyland WB, Cole AJ, et al. An in vitro study of the radiobiological effects of flattening filter free radiotherapy treatments. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(5):N83-N94. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/5/N8310.1088/0031-9155/58/5/N8323399781
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
39. Lohse I, Lang S, Hrbacek J, et al. Effect of high dose per pulse flattening filter-free beams on cancer cell survival. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2011;101(1):226-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.07210.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.07221733592
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
40. Favaudon V, Caplier L, Monceau V, et al. Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor tissue in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(245):245ra93-245ra93. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.300897310.1126/scitranslmed.300897325031268
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Dosimetric impact of FFF over FF beam using VMAT for brain neoplasms treated with radiotherapy

Abstract

Paradigm

My account