Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of helical tomotherapy with multi-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment plans using simultaneous integrated boost in high-risk prostate cancer Cover

Comparison of helical tomotherapy with multi-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment plans using simultaneous integrated boost in high-risk prostate cancer

Open Access
|Jul 2021

References

  1. 1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7-30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.2159010.3322/caac.21590
  2. 2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancerstatistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality World wide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492. Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(4):313.10.3322/caac.21492
  3. 3. Kuban DA, Tucker SL, Dong L, et al. Long-termresults of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(1):67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.05410.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.054
  4. 4. Dearnaley DP, Jovic G, Syndikus I, et al. Escalated-dose versus control-dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: long-term results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(4):464-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70040-310.1016/S1470-2045(14)70040-3
  5. 5. Cilla S, Deodato F, Digesù C, Macchia G, Picardi V, Ferro M, Sallustio G, De Spirito M, Piermattei A, Morganti AG. Assessing the feasibility of volumetric-modulated arc therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-VMAT): An analysis for complex head-neck, high-risk prostate and rectal cancer cases. Med Dosim. 2014 Spring;39(1):108-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Dec 15. PMID: 24342167.10.1016/j.meddos.2013.11.001
  6. 6. Saracino B, Petrongari MG, Marzi S, et al. Intensity-modulated pelvic radiation therapy and simultaneous integrated boost to the prostate area in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: a preliminary report of disease control. Cancer Med. 2014;3(5):1313-1321. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.27810.1002/cam4.278
  7. 7. Pacelli R, Caroprese M, Palma G, et al. Technologicalevolution of radiationtreatment: Implications for clinical applications. Semin Oncol. 2019;46(3):193-201. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.07.00410.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.07.004
  8. 8. Cuccia F, Mazzola R, Arcangeli S, et al. Moderate hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for localized prostate cancer: preliminary report of an observational prospective study. Tumori. 2019;105(6):516-523. https://doi.org/10.1177/030089161986784610.1177/0300891619867846
  9. 9. Morikawa LK, Roach M. Pelvic nodal radiotherapy in patients with unfavorable intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: evidence, rationale, and future directions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80(1):6-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.07410.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.074
  10. 10. Lawton CA, Michalski J, El-Naqa I, et al. RTOG GU Radiation oncology specialists reachconsensus on pelvic lymph node volumes for high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74(2):383-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.00210.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.002
  11. 11. Liang J, Wu Q, Yan D. The role of seminal vesicle motion in target margin assessment for online image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(3):935-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.01910.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.019
  12. 12. Ramiandrisoa F, Duvergé L, Castelli J, et al. Détermination des marges du volume cible anatomoclinique au volume cible prévisionnel pour la radiothérapie du cancer prostatique [Clinical to planning target volume margins in prostate cancer radiotherapy]. Cancer Radiother. 2016 Oct;20(6-7):629-39. French. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canrad.2016.07.09510.1016/j.canrad.2016.07.095
  13. 13. Piotrowski T, Kaczmarek K, Bajon T, et al. Evaluation of image-guidance strategies for prostate cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2014;13(6):583-91. https://doi.org/10.7785/tcrtexpress.2013.60025810.7785/tcrtexpress.2013.600258
  14. 14. Gay HA, Barthold HJ, O’Meara E, et al. Pelvic normal tissue contouring guidelines for radiationtherapy: A RadiationTherapy Oncology Group consensus panel atlas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;83:e353-e362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.02310.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.023
  15. 15. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 83. Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). J ICRU 2010;10(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/ndq00210.1093/jicru/ndq002
  16. 16. Michalski JM, Gay H, Jackson A, Tucker SL, Deasy JO. Radiation dose-volume effects in radiation-induced rectal injury [published correction appears in Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Aug 1;104(5):1185]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl):S123-S129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.07810.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.078
  17. 17. Wolff D, Stieler F, Welzel G, et al. Volumetric modulated arctherapy (VMAT) vs. serial tomotherapy, step-and-shoot IMRT and 3D conformal RT for treatment of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93:226-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.01110.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.011
  18. 18. Shaw E, Kline R, Gillin M, et al. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: Radiosurgery quality assurance guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;27:1231-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(93)90548-a10.1016/0360-3016(93)90548-A
  19. 19. Feuvret L, Noël G, Mazeron JJ, Bey P. Conformity index: a review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64(2):333-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.02810.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.028
  20. 20. Kataria T, Sharma K, Subramani V, et al. Homogeneity Index: An objective tool for assessment of conformal radiation treatments. J Med Phys. 2012;37(4):207-213. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.10360610.4103/0971-6203.103606
  21. 21. Ning ZH, Mu JM, Jin JX, et al. Single arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy is sufficient for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison with dual arc VMAT and dynamic MLC and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:237. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-23710.1186/1748-717X-8-237
  22. 22. Skórska M, Piotrowski T. Optimization of treatment planning parameters used in tomotherapy for prostate cancer patients. Phys Med. 2013;29(3):273-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.03.00710.1016/j.ejmp.2012.03.007
  23. 23. Cao D, Holmes TW, Afghan MK, Shepard DM. Comparison of plan quality provided by intensity-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69(1):240-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.07310.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.073
  24. 24. Tsai CL, Wu JK, Chao HL, et al. Treatment and dosimetric advantages between VMAT, IMRT, and helical tomotherapy in prostate cancer. Med Dosim. 2011;36(3):264-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2010.05.00110.1016/j.meddos.2010.05.001
  25. 25. Rong Y, Tang G, Welsh JS, et al. Helical tomotherapy versus single-arc intensity-modulated arctherapy: a collaborative dosimetric comparison between two institutions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81(1):284-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.05910.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.059
  26. 26. Ishii K, Ogino R, Okada W, et al. A dosimetric comparison of RapidArc and IMRT with hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost to the prostate for treatment of prostate cancer. Br J Radiol. 2013;86(1030):20130199. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.2013019910.1259/bjr.20130199
  27. 27. Davidson MT, Blake SJ, Batchelar DL, et al. Assessingthe role of volumetricmodulatedarctherapy (VMAT) relative to IMRT and helical tomotherapy in the management of localized, locally advanced, and post-operative prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80(5):1550-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.02410.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.024
  28. 28. Pasquier D, Cavillon F, Lacornerie T, et al. A dosimetric comparison of tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer with pelvic nodal radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85(2):549-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.04610.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.046
  29. 29. Servagi-Vernat S, Giraud P, Fenoglietto P, et al. Apport de la RCMI rotationnelle et de la tomothérapiehélicoïdaledans les cancers pelviens : étudedosimétrique prospective sur 51 patients [Impact of dynamic IMRT and tomotherapy in pelvic cancers: a prospective dosimetric study with 51 patients]. Cancer Radiother. 2014;18(2):111-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canrad.2013.12.00810.1016/j.canrad.2013.12.008
  30. 30. Abu-Gheida I, Reddy CA, Kotecha R, et al. Ten-Year Outcomes of Moderately Hypofractionated (70 Gy in 28 fractions) Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;104(2):325-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.09110.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.091
  31. 31. Widesott L, Pierelli A, Fiorino C, et al. Helical tomotherapy vs. intensity-modulated proton therapy for whole pelvis irradiation in high-risk prostate cancer patients: dosimetric, normal tissue complication probability, and generalized equivalent uniform dose analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80(5):1589-1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.00510.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.005
  32. 32. Barelkowski T, Wust P, Kaul D, et al. Image-guided dose-escalated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer with helical tomotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol. 2020;196(3):229-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-019-01562-210.1007/s00066-019-01562-2
  33. 33. Beck M, Wust P, Barelkowski T, et al. Risk adapted dose-intensified postoperative radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients using a simultaneous integrated boost technique applied with helical Tomotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2017;12(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0862-410.1186/s13014-017-0862-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2021-0017 | Journal eISSN: 1898-0309 | Journal ISSN: 1425-4689
Language: English
Page range: 143 - 149
Published on: Jul 1, 2021
Published by: Polish Society of Medical Physics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Hamit Başaran, Sibel Karaca, Timur Koca, Yasemin Örs Gündoğdu, published by Polish Society of Medical Physics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.