6. Messaoudi N, Bekka RE. Simulated surface EMG signal as a function of physiological and non-physiological parameters: Analyze and interpretation. 2015: The Fourth International Conference on Electrical Engineering, ICEE2015, Boumerdes, Algeria, Proceedings, IEEE Xplore. https://doi.org/10.1109/INTEE.2015.741680110.1109/INTEE.2015.7416801
7. Fuglevand A, Winter DA, Patla AE, Stashuk D, et al. Detection of motor unit action potentials with surface electrodes: influence of electrode size and spacing. Biol Cybern. 1992:67(2):143-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0020102110.1007/BF002010211627684
11. Messaoudi N, Bekka RE, Belkacem S, et al. Cross-Correlation coefficient as a means for estimating the effect of MVC level according to the fibres inclination’, The Fifth International Conference on Electrical Engineering. 2017: ICEE2017, Boumerdes, Algeria, Proceedings, IEEE Xplore. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEE-B.2017.819216610.1109/ICEE-B.2017.8192166
12. Beck TW, Housh TJ, Cramer JT, Weir JP, et al. The effects of inter-electrode distance over the innervation zone and normalization on the electromyographic amplitude and mean power frequency versus concentric, eccentric, and isometric torque relationships for the vastus lateralis muscle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009:19(2): 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.07.00710.1016/j.jelekin.2007.07.00717884581
13. Messaoudi N, Bekka RE. From single fibre action potential to surface electromyographic signal: A simulation study. Third International Conference, IWBBIO 2015, Granada, Spain, Proceedings, Part I, LNCS 9043, April 15-17, 2015:315–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16483-0_3210.1007/978-3-319-16483-0_32
16. Rosenfalck P. Intra and extracellular fields of active nerve and muscle fibres: A physico-mathematical analysis of different models. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1969:321:1-168.
18. Keenan KG, Valero-Cuevas FJ. Experimentally valid predictions of muscle force and EMG in models of motor-unit function are most sensitive to neural properties. J. Neurophysiol. 2007:98(3):1581-1590. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00577.200710.1152/jn.00577.200717615125
21. Messaoudi N, Bekka RE, Belkacem S, et al. Classification of the systems used in surface electromyographic signal detection according to the degree of isotropy. Adv Biomed Eng. 2018:7(1):107-116. https://doi.org/10.14326/abe.7.10710.14326/abe.7.107
23. Merletti R, Farina D. (edts) Surface Electromyography: physiology, engineering and applications, IEEE Press / J Wiley, USA, May 2016.10.1002/9781119082934
24. Afsharipour B, Soedirdjo S, Merletti R, et al. Two-dimensional surface EMG: The effects of electrode size, interelectrode distance and image truncation. Biomed Sig Process Control. 2019: 49(1):298-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2018.12.00110.1016/j.bspc.2018.12.001