Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Application of DQE for quantitative assessment of detectors to estimate AEC efficiency in digital mammography Cover

Application of DQE for quantitative assessment of detectors to estimate AEC efficiency in digital mammography

Open Access
|Mar 2021

References

  1. 1. García-Mollá R, Linares R, Ayala R. Study of DQE dependence with beam quality on GE essential mammography flat panel. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010;12(1):3176. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i1.317610.1120/jacmp.v12i1.3176571858821330969
  2. 2. Marshall NW, Monnin P, Bosmans H, Bochud FO, Verdun FR. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(14):4201-4220. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/14/00210.1088/0031-9155/56/14/00221701051
  3. 3. Gershan V, Ristova MM, Ivanovski Z. Evaluation of the Hologic Selenia FFDMsystem with tungsten tube. In: The First International Conference on Radiation and Dosimetry in Various Field of research, RAD 2012 Proceedings. 2012
  4. 4. Monnin P, Bosmans H, Verdun FR, Marshall N. A comprehensive model for quantum noise characterization in digital mammography. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:2083-2108. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/61/5/208310.1088/0031-9155/61/5/208326895467
  5. 5. Oberhofer N, Fracchetti A, Springeth M, Ehrenfried M. Digital mammography--DQE versus optimized image quality in clinical environment: an on site study. Proceedings Volume 7622, Medical Imaging 2010: Physics of Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.84415010.1117/12.844150
  6. 6. Ghetti C, Borrini A, Ortenzia O, Rossi R, Ordóñez, PL. Physical characteristics of GE Senographe Essential and DS digital mammography detectors. Med Phys. 2008:35:456-463. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.282818510.1118/1.282818518383665
  7. 7. NHS Breast Screening Programme Equipment Report. Technical evaluation of GE Healthcare Senographe Pristina digital breast tomosynthesis system. 2019. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/breast-screening-ge-senographe-pristina-dbt-system-evaluation
  8. 8. NHS Breast Screening Programme Equipment Report. Technical evaluation of Siemens Mammomat Inspiration digital breast tomosynthesis system − modified detector and software (VB60). 2018. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/breast-screening-siemens-mammomat-inspiration-vb60
  9. 9. NHS Breast Screening Programme Equipment Report. Technical Evaluation of Hologic 3Dimensions digital mammography system in 2D mode. 2019. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/breast-screening-hologic-3d-digital-mammography-system-in-2d-mode
  10. 10. Technical evaluation of Siemens Inspiration PRIME with VB30L software NHS Breast Screening Programme Equipment Report 1503. 2016. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/breast-screening-evaluation-of-siemens-inspiration-prime
  11. 11. Marshall NW. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:2441-63. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/10/00610.1088/0031-9155/51/10/00616675862
  12. 12. European Commission. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. Fourth edition, supplements, 2013.
  13. 13. International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical electrical equipment - Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices - Part 1-2: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency - Detectors used in mammography. IEC 62220-1-2:2007
  14. 14. Ayala R, Linares R, García-Mollá R. MIQuaELa, software for DQE measuring in digital radiography/mammography. In: Dössel O., Schlegel W.C. (eds) World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 25/2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03879-2_23010.1007/978-3-642-03879-2_230
  15. 15. Dance DR, Skinner CL, Young KC, Beckett JR, Kotre CJ. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys Med Biol. 2000;45:3225-40. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/30810.1088/0031-9155/45/11/30811098900
  16. 16. Chevalier M, Morán P, Ten JI, et al. Patient dose in digital mammography. Med Phys. 2004;31:2471-2479. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.178459110.1118/1.178459115487727
  17. 17. Salvagnini E, Bosmans H, Struelens L, Marshall NW. Effective detective quantum efficiency for two mammography systems: Measurement and comparison against established metrics. Med Phys. 2013;40:101916. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.482036210.1118/1.482036224089918
  18. 18. Salvagnini E, Bosmans H, Struelens L, Marshall N. Effective detective quantum efficiency (eDQE) and effective noise equivalent quanta (eNEQ) for system optimization purposes in digital mammography. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. 8313. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.91119310.1117/12.911193
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2021-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1898-0309 | Journal ISSN: 1425-4689
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 56
Published on: Mar 18, 2021
Published by: Polish Society of Medical Physics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:

© 2021 Ewa Fabiszewska, Anna Wysocka-Rabin, Magdalena Dobrzyńska, Witold Skrzyński, Katarzyna Pasicz, published by Polish Society of Medical Physics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.