Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of various common prostate IMRT techniques based on estimated tumor control and normal tissue complication probabilities in correlation with patients anatomical parameters derived from the CT scans Cover

Evaluation of various common prostate IMRT techniques based on estimated tumor control and normal tissue complication probabilities in correlation with patients anatomical parameters derived from the CT scans

Open Access
|Mar 2019

References

  1. [1] Center MM, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol. 2012;61(6):1079-1092.10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.05422424666
  2. [2] Khan FM, Gerbi BJ. Treatment planning in radiation oncology. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
  3. [3] Pan HY, Jiang J, Hoffman KE, et al. Comparative toxicities and cost of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, proton radiation, and stereotactic body radiotherapy among younger men with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(18):1823-1830.10.1200/JCO.2017.75.5371600810529561693
  4. [4] Mavroidis P, Komisopoulos G, Buckey C, et al. Radiobiological evaluation of prostate cancer IMRT and conformal-RT plans using different treatment protocols. Phys Med. 2017;40:33-41.10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.07.00328712717
  5. [5] Luxton G, Hancock SL, Boyer AL. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(1):267-284.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.02415093924
  6. [6] Deb P, Fielding AL. Radiobiological model comparison of 3D conformal radiotherapy and IMRT plans for the treatment of prostate cancer. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2009;32(2):51-61.10.1007/BF0317862919623855
  7. [7] Mesbahi A, Rasouli N, Mohammadzadeh M, et al. Comparison of Radiobiological Models for Radiation Therapy Plans of Prostate Cancer: Three-dimensional Conformal versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2018;8(3):1-12.10.31661/jbpe.v9i3Jun.655
  8. [8] Khan MI, Jiang R, Kiciak A, et al. Dosimetric and radiobiological characterizations of prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy: A single-institution review of ninety cases. J Med Phys. 2016;41(3):162-168.10.4103/0971-6203.189479501903427651562
  9. [9] Chow J, Jiang R, Kiciak A. Dose-volume consistency and radiobiological characterization between prostate IMRT and VMAT plans. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol. 2016;4(4).
  10. [10] Chow JC, Jiang R, Kiciak A, Markel D. Dosimetric comparison between the prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using the planning target volume (PTV) dose–volume factor. J Radiother Pract. 2016;15(3):263-268.10.1017/S1460396916000194
  11. [11] Schreibmann E, Xing L. Feasibility study of beam orientation class-solutions for prostate IMRT. Med Phys. 2004;31(10):2863-2870.10.1118/1.179757115543796
  12. [12] Schreibmann E, Lahanas M, Xing L, et al. Multiobjective evolutionary optimization of the number of beams, their orientations and weights for intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49(5):747-770.10.1088/0031-9155/49/5/00715070200
  13. [13] Yang R, Dai J, Yang Y, et al. Beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using mixed integer programming. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(15):3653-3666.10.1088/0031-9155/51/15/00416861772
  14. [14] Yuan L, Ge Y, Lee WR, et al. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans. Med Phys. 2012;39(11):6868-6878.10.1118/1.4757927
  15. [15] Wu B, Ricchetti F, Sanguineti G, et al. Patient geometry-driven information retrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control. Med Phys. 2009;36(12):5497-5505.10.1118/1.3253464
  16. [16] Källman P, Agren A, Brahme A. Tumour and normal tissue responses to fractionated non-uniform dose delivery. Int J Radiat Biol. 1992;62(2):249-262.10.1080/09553009214552071
  17. [17] Pollack A, Walker G, Horwitz EM, et al. Randomized trial of hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(31):3860-3868.10.1200/JCO.2013.51.1972
  18. [18] Sanchez-Nieto B, Nahum AE. BIOPLAN: software for the biological evaluation of radiotherapy treatment plans. Med Dosim. 2000;25(2):71-76.10.1016/S0958-3947(00)00031-5
  19. [19] Hodapp N. The ICRU Report 83: prescribing, recording and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Strahlenther Onkol. 2012;188(1):97-99.10.1007/s00066-011-0015-x22234506
  20. [20] Lee WR, Amin MB, Bruner DW, et al. A phase III randomized study of hypofractionated 3D-CRT/IMRT versus conventionally fractionated 3D-CRT/IMRT in patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer. Clinical Trial NCT00331773.
  21. [21] Pollack A, Hanlon AL, Horwitz EM, et al. Dosimetry and preliminary acute toxicity in the first 100 men treated for prostate cancer on a randomized hypofractionation dose escalation trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64(2):518-526.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.970189275416242256
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2019-0006 | Journal eISSN: 1898-0309 | Journal ISSN: 1425-4689
Language: English
Page range: 35 - 41
Submitted on: Jul 21, 2018
Accepted on: Jan 15, 2019
Published on: Mar 28, 2019
Published by: Polish Society of Medical Physics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Amin Banaei, Bijan Hashemi, Mohsen Bakhshandeh, Bahram Mofid, published by Polish Society of Medical Physics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.