Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The sensitivity of contact stresses in the mandibular premolar region to the shape of Zirconia dental implant: A 3D finite element study

Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering
Volume 24 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)
By:
Open Access
|Jun 2018

References

  1. [1] Misch CE. Dental Implant Prosthetics. St Louis: Mosby, 2005:322-347.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res. 1999;13:99-119.10.1177/08959374990130012301
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Geng JP, Ma QS, Xu W, et al. Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(3):233-239.10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01213.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Eraslan O, Inan O. The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: A 3-D finite element analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14(4):411-416.10.1007/s00784-009-0305-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Brånemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50(3):399-410.10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Natali AN, Pavan PG, Ruggero AL. Analysis of bone–implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006. 17(1):67-74.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01162.x16441786
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Faegh S, Chou HY, Muftu S. Load transfer along the bone-implant interface and its effects on bone maintenance. In: Turkyilmaz I (ed). Dental Implants: A Rapidly Evolving Practice. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech Publishing, 2011:163-190.10.5772/18433
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Kurniawan D, Nor FM, Lee HY, et al: Finite element analysis of bone implant biomechanics refinement through featuring various osseointegration conditions. Int J Oral Maxifollac Surg. 2012;41(9):1090-1096.10.1016/j.ijom.2011.12.02622260789
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Kong L, Hu K, Li D, et al. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(1):65-74.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Gultekin BA, Gultekin P, Yalcin S. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry. In: Ebrahimi F (ed). Finite Element Analysis: New Trends and Developments. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech Publishing, 2012:21-54.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Bona AD, Pecho OE, Alessandretti R. Zirconia as a Dental Biomaterial. Materials (Basel). 2015;8(8):4978-4991.10.3390/ma8084978545553228793485
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Apicella D, Joda T, Bonadeo G, et al. Case-specific finite element analysis of dental CAD/CAM prostheses to identify design flaws prior to manufacture. Am J Dent. 2016;29(6):339-344.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Shriram D, Praveen Kumar G, Cui F, et al. Evaluating the effects of material properties of artificial meniscal implant in the human knee joint using finite element analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1): 6011.10.1038/s41598-017-06271-3551968328729605
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Shriram D, Parween R, Lee YHD, et al. Effects of counteracting external valgus moment on lateral tibial cartilage contact conditions and tibial rotation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Bio Soc 2017; 2017:1625-1628.10.1109/EMBC.2017.803715029060194
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Shriram D, Kumar GP, Lee YHD, et al. Effect of posterior root tear of the lateral meniscus on the articular cartilage during the stance phase of gait cycle: a finite-element study. Proceedings of XXVI Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Winter W, Klein D, Karl M. Effect of model parameters on finite element analysis of micromotions in implant dentistry. J Oral Implantol 2013;39(1):23-29.10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-0022123402356
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, et al. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(2):129-136.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01800.x19709058
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Ao J, Li T, Liu Y, et al. Optimal design of thread height and width on an immediately loaded cylinder implant: A finite element analysis. Comput Biol Med. 2010;40(8):681-686.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.10.00720599193
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Liu TC, Chang CH, Wong TY, et al. Finite element analysis of mini screw implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141(4):468-476.10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.11.01222464529
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985:199-209.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] O’Mahony AM, Williams JL, Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(6):648-657.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120614.x11737110
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Dechow PC, Nail GA, Schwartz-Dabney CL, et al. Elastic properties of human supraorbital and mandibular bone. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1993;90(3):291-306.10.1002/ajpa.13309003048460653
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] O’Mahony AM, Williams JL, Katz JO, et al. Anisotropic elastic properties of cancellous bone from a human edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11(5):415-421.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005415.x11168233
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, et a:. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater. 2004;20(5):449-456.10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.00215081551
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Giannuzzi LA, Phifer D, Giannuzzi NJ, et al. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional analysis of bone/dental implant interfaces with the use of focused ion beam and electron microscopy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65(4):737-747.10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.02517368372
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2(3):120-128.10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00002.x11359256
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Li T, Kong L, Wang Y, et al. Selection of optimal dental implant diameter and length in type IV bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(10):1077-1083.10.1016/j.ijom.2009.07.00119656657
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Woodmansey KF, Ayik M, Buschang PH, et al. Differences in masticatory function in patients with endodontically treated teeth and single-implant-supported prostheses: A pilot study. J Endod 2009;35(1):10-14.10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Huang HL, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ, et al. Biomechanical simulation of various surface roughnesses and geometric designs on an immediately loaded dental implant. Comput Biol Med. 2010;40(5):525-532.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2010.03.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Mosavar A, Ziaei A, Kadkhodaei M. The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: A Finite Element Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30(6):1317-132610.11607/jomi.4091
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Froum SJ, Simon H, Cho SC, et al. Histologic evaluation of bone-implant contact of immediately loaded transitional implants after 6 to 27 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20(1):54-60.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Coelho PG, Marin C, Granato R, et al. Clinical device-related article histomorphologic analysis of 30 plateau root form implants retrieved after 8 to 13 years in function. A human retrieval study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;91(2):975-979.10.1002/jbm.b.31455
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Hansson S, Werke M. The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: The effect of thread size and thread profile: A finite element study. J Biomech 2003; 36:1247–1258.10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00164-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Misch CE, Strong T, Bidez MW. Scientific rationale for dental implant design. In: Misch CE (ed). Contemporary Implant Dentistry, ed 3. St Louis: Mosby, 2008:200-229.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Fuh LJ, Hsu JT, Huang HL, et al. Biomechanical investigation of thread designs and interface conditions of zirconia and titanium dental Implants with bone: Three-Dimensional Numeric Analysis Int.J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28(2):e64–e71.10.11607/jomi.213123527370
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2018-0008 | Journal eISSN: 1898-0309 | Journal ISSN: 1425-4689
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 55 - 63
Submitted on: Mar 13, 2018
Accepted on: May 23, 2018
Published on: Jun 26, 2018
Published by: Polish Society of Medical Physics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
dental implant,
finite element method,
osseointegration,
stress analysis,
thread profile
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Biomedical engineering,
Physics,
Technical and applied physics,
Medical physics

© 2018 Duraisamy Velmurugan, Masilamany Santha Alphin, Benedict Jain AR Tony, published by Polish Society of Medical Physics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 24 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)Next article