Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Kontrola Systemów Planowania Leczenia 3D W Radioterapii Wiązkami Zewnętrznymi Fotonów I Elektronów Cover

Kontrola Systemów Planowania Leczenia 3D W Radioterapii Wiązkami Zewnętrznymi Fotonów I Elektronów

Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering
Volume 20 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)
By: Marcin Dybek,  Janusz Winiecki,  Tomasz Iwanicki,  Marzena Janiszewska,  Damian Kabat,  Paweł Kukołowicz,  Marcin Litoborski,  Joanna Minczewska and  Maciej Raczkowski  
Open Access
|Jun 2014

References

  1. [1] AAPM, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Report 55: Radiation treatment planning dosimetry verification, Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 23. American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD, USA, 1995.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] AAPM, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Report 85: Tissue inhomogeneity corrections for megavoltage photon beams, Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 65, American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD, USA, 2004.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Brahme A, Chavaudra J, Landbeg T, McCullough E., Nusslin F.,Rawlinson A, Svensson G and Svensson H. Accuracy equirements and quality assurance of external beam therapy with photons and electrons. Acta Oncol Suppl 1, 1988.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Craig T, Brochu D, Van Dyk J. A quality assurance phantom for three-dimensional radiation treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44: 955-966, 1999.10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00070-X
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Fraass B, Doppke K, Hunt M, McCullough E, Nusslin F, Rawlinson A, Svensson G and Svensson H. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: Quality assurance for clinical adiotherapy treatment planning. Med Phys 25: 1773-1836, 1998.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] IAEA, International Atomic Energy Agency.Technical Report Series No. 430:Commissioning and quality assurance of computerized planning systems for radiation treatment of cancer. Vienna, Austria, 2004.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] IEC Report 62083: Medical electrical equipment - Requirements for the safety of radiotherapy treatment planning systems. International Electrotechnical Commision, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] IPEMB, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine and Biology. Report 68: A guide to commissioning and quality control of treatment planning systems. York, United Kingdom, 1996. 1
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Low DA, Wong JW and Purdy J A. A software tool for the quantitative evaluation of 3D dose calculation algorithms. Med Phys 25: 1830-1836, 1998.10.1118/1.598363
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Low DA, Harms WB, Mutic S, Purdy JA. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys 25: 656-661, 1998.10.1118/1.598248
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Low DA, Dempsey JF. Evaluation of the gamma dose distribition comparison method. Med. Phys. 30: 2455-2464, 2003.10.1118/1.1598711
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] McCullough E, Holmes TW. Acceptance testing of computerized radiation therapy treatment planning systems: Direct tilization of CT scandata. Med Phys 12: 237-242, 1985.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] McGee K P and Das IJ. Evaluation of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) used for clinical radiotherapy: a phantom study. Med Phys 22: 1815-1827, 1995.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Mijnheer B, Olszewska A, Fiorini C, Hartmann G, Knoos T, Rosenwald JC, Welleweerd H. Quality assurance of treatment planning systems - practical examples for non-IMRT photon beams. ESTRO (European Society for herapeutic adiology and Oncology), Booklet no. 7 (Physics for Radiotherapy), ESTRO, Brussels, 2004.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Mills MD, van ‘t Veld AA and Bruinvis IA, Influence of shape on the accuracy of grid-based volume computations, Med. hys. 22: 1377-85, 1995.10.1118/1.597619
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Monitor unit calculation for high energy photon beams.ESTRO Booklet No. 3. ESTRO, Brussels, Belgium, 1997.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] NCS, Netherlands Commissionon Radiation Dosimetry. Report 12: Recommendations for the determination and use of catter correction factors of megavoltage photon beams. Delft, The Netherlands,1998.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Netherlands Commission on Radiation Dosimetry, Subcommittee Treatment Planning Systems, Quality assurance of 3-D treatment planning systems for external photon and electron beams, 2005. (http://radiationdosimetry.org/files/documents/0000016/69-ncs-rapport-15-qa-3-d-tps-external-photonand-electron-beams.pdf)
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Panitsa E, Rosenwald JC, Kappas C. Quality conrol of dose volume histogram computation characteristics of 3D treatment planning systems. Phys. Med. Biol. 43: 2807-2816, 1998.10.1088/0031-9155/43/10/010
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Rosenow U, Dannhausen H-W, Luebbert K, Nusslin F, Richter J, Robrandt B,Seelentag W-W and Wendhausen H. Quality assurance in treatment planning. Report from the German Task Group. In: The Use of Computers In Radiation Therapy, North-Holland, Elsevier Science Publishers BV, pp. 45-58, 1987.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] SSRMP, Swiss Society for Radiobiology and Medical Physics. Report 7: Quality control of treatment planning systems or teletherapy. ISBN 3-908125-23-5, 1997.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Thomas SJ. Relative electron density calibration of CT scanners for radiotherapy treatment planning. Brit J Radiol 72: 781-786, 1999.10.1259/bjr.72.860.10624344
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Westermann CF, Mijnheer BJ, van Kleffens H J. Determination of theaccuracy of different computer planning systems for treatment with external photon beams. Radiother Oncol 1: 339-347, 1984. 10.1016/S0167-8140(84)80022-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Van Dyk J, Barnett RB, Cygler, JE and Shragge, PC. Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 26: 261-273, 1993.10.1016/0360-3016(93)90206-B
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] Venselaar JLM, Welleweerd J andMijnheer BJ. Tolerances for the accuracy of photon beam dose calculations of treatment planning systems. Radiother Oncol 60: 191-201, 2001.10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00377-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Venselaar JLM and Welleweerd J. Application of a test package in an intercomparison of the performance of treatment lanning systems used in a clinicalsetting. Radiother Oncol 60: 203-213, 2001.10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00304-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] Van ’t Veld AA. Analysis of accuracy in dose and position in calculations of a treatment planning system for blocked photon fields. Radiother Oncol 45: 245-251,1997. 10.1016/S0167-8140(97)00133-3
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2014-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1898-0309 | Journal ISSN: 1425-4689
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 32
Published on: Jun 17, 2014
Published by: Polish Society of Medical Physics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Biomedical engineering,
Physics,
Technical and applied physics,
Medical physics

© 2014 Marcin Dybek, Janusz Winiecki, Tomasz Iwanicki, Marzena Janiszewska, Damian Kabat, Paweł Kukołowicz, Marcin Litoborski, Joanna Minczewska, Maciej Raczkowski, published by Polish Society of Medical Physics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 20 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)