Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Coercive Mechanisms and Audit Documentation Quality in Integrated and Sustainability Reporting: A Comparative EU Analysis Cover

Coercive Mechanisms and Audit Documentation Quality in Integrated and Sustainability Reporting: A Comparative EU Analysis

Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Accountancy Europe. (2022). Public audit oversight: Streamlining European countries’ oversight regimes. Brussels: Accountancy Europe.
  2. APAS – Abschlussprüferaufsichtsstelle. (2024). Jahresbericht 2024. Berlin: BAFA/APAS.
  3. Backof, A. G., Bowlin, K., & Goodson, B. M. (2022). The importance of clarification of auditors’ responsibilities under the new audit reporting standards. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(4), 2284–2304.
  4. CEAOB – Committee of European Auditing Oversight Bodies. (2024). Report on the 2024 CEAOB Enforcement Questionnaire. Brussels: European Commission.
  5. Compagnie Nationale des Commissaires aux Comptes (CNCC). (2024). Rapport d’activité 2024. Paris: CNCC.
  6. DeFond, M. L., & Lennox, C. S. (2017). Do PCAOB inspections improve the quality of internal control audits? Journal of Accounting Research, 55(3), 591–627.
  7. Fuller, S. H., Heron, N. M., Riley, T. J., & Stuart, A. C. (2025). Current developments in sustainability assurance: Impact of emerging regulations. Current Issues in Auditing, pp. 1–13. American Accounting Association.
  8. Garefalakis, A., Sitzimis, I., Angelaki, E., Giannopoulos, P., & Kyriakogkonas, P. (2025). Audit quality indicators across jurisdictions: Regulatory diversity, ESG integration, and implications for public trust. Sustainability, 17(21), Article 9421.
  9. García‑Osma, B., Gisbert, A., & de las Heras, E. (2017). Public oversight systems for statutory auditors in the European Union. European Journal of Law & Economics, 44(3), 517–552.
  10. Gisbert, A., Navallas, B., Gómez‑Carrasco, P., & de las Heras, E. (2025). Implications of the EU regulation on public oversight systems for statutory auditors. Spanish Accounting Review, 28(1), 133–150.
  11. Haute Autorité de l’Audit (H2A). (2024). Rapport annuel 2024. Paris: H2A.
  12. IFIAR – International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators. (2024). Annual Inspection Findings Survey 2024. Tokyo: IFIAR.
  13. Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas (ICAC). (2024). Annual Activity Report 2024. Madrid: ICAC.
  14. Işık, B. K., & Vural, A. (2025). Preventing audit quality risks in independent audit: A road map in the light of theoretical approaches. International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences, 15(1), 135–156.
  15. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Owusu-Afriyie, R., Awunyo-Vitor, D., Gyimah, P., & Appiah, K. O. (2024). Monitoring and audit quality: Does quality standards compliance matter? Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), Article 2416095.
  17. Sirois, L.-P., Bédard, J., & Bera, P. (2018). The informational value of key audit matters in the auditor’s report: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. Accounting Horizons, 32(2), 141–162.
  18. Wirtschaftsprüferkammer (WPK). (2024). Bericht über die Berufsaufsicht 2024. Berlin: WPK.
Language: English
Page range: 335 - 349
Published on: Jul 15, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Alexandru Ioan MACA, Oana V. TIRDEA, Gina Elena ZLATE, Daniel BUDA, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.