Have a personal or library account? Click to login

From Life Space to Cyberspace: Reimagining Lewin’s and Bourdieu’s Field Theories for the Digital Era

Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. Adams, G. R. (1985). Identity and political socialization. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, (30), 61-77.
  2. Alvarez-Jimenez, A. (2012). Boundary agreements in the International Court of Justice’s case law, 2000–2010. European Journal of International Law, 23(2), 495-515.
  3. Armet, S. (2009). Religious socialization and identity formation of adolescents in high tension religions. Review of Religious Research, 50(3), 277-297.
  4. Ayob, S. M., Yee, C. H., Muhamad, N. D., & Jusoh, A. (2005, November). A new hybrid multilevel inverter topology with harmonics profile improvement. In 2005 International Conference on Power Electronics and Drives Systems (Vol. 2, pp. 999-1002). IEEE.
  5. Barker, R. G. (1963). Kurt Lewin Memorial Award Address – 1963. On the Nature of the Environment. Journal of Social Issues, 19(4), 16.
  6. Bilberg, A., & Malik, A. A. (2019). Digital twin driven human–robot collaborative assembly. CIRP Annals, 68(1), 499-502.
  7. Bottero, W., & Crossley, N. (2011). Worlds, fields and networks: Becker, Bourdieu and the structures of social relations. Cultural Sociology, 5(1), 99-119.
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Social Science Information, 24(2), 195-220.
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14-25.
  10. Bourdieu, P., & Chartier, R. (1989). Gens à histoire, gens sans histoire: dialogue Bourdieu/Chartier. Politix. Revue des sciences sociales du politique, 2(6), 53-60.
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1994). The Field of Cultural Production. Columbia University Press.
  12. Bourdieu, P. (2003). The Formation of the Economic Habitus. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 150(5), 79-90.
  13. Burnes, B., & Cooke, B. (2013). K urt L ewin’s Field Theory: A Review and Re‐evaluation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 408-425.
  14. Chakraborty, R., & De, S. (2022). Camouflaged Protocols of Womanhood: Inherent Paradoxes of Bengal. Psychological Studies, 67(4), 488-500.
  15. Chandler, W. M. (1974). Peer-group socialization among German students. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 7(4), 687-700.
  16. Ciofu, I., Kondort, G., Pop, S., Cioc, R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Business Operations: Exploring Productivity and Acceptance. Analele Universității din Oradea. Seria Științe Economice, XXXIII(2), 263-274.
  17. Davis, J. (2013). Identity Invisibility and Social Forces. Lancaster University (United Kingdom).
  18. Deighton-Smith, N., & Bell, B. T. (2018). Objectifying fitness: A content and thematic analysis of #fitspiration images on social media. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(4), 467-483.
  19. De Vries, E. L.E. (2019). When more likes is not better: the consequences of high and low likes-to-followers ratios for perceived account credibility and social media marketing effectiveness. Marketing Letters, 30(3), 275-291.
  20. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
  21. Edelman, M. (1978). Space and the social order. Journal of Architectural Education, 32(2), 2-7.
  22. Farivar, S., Wang, F., & Turel, O. (2022). Followers’ problematic engagement with influencers on social media: An attachment theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 133, 107288.
  23. Fischer-Kattner, A. (2018). Violent Encounters at Ostend, 1601–1604: Patiality, Location, and Identity in Early Modern Siege Warfare. Comparativ, 28(2), 22-41.
  24. French, S. E., Coleman, B. R., & DiLorenzo, M. L. (2013). Linking racial identity, ethnic identity, and racial-ethnic socialization: A tale of three race-ethnicities. Identity, 13(1), 1-45.
  25. Gans, H. J. (2002). The sociology of space: a use–centered view. City & Community, 1(4), 329-339.
  26. Henle, M. (1978). Kurt Lewin as metatheorist. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), 233-237.
  27. Irgaliyev, A. (2024). Analysis of Digital Socialization Concepts: Indicators and Criteria of Digital Socialization. Journal of Psychology & Sociology, 90(3), 18.
  28. Kariel, H. S. (1956). Democracy unlimited: Kurt Lewin’s field theory. American Journal of Sociology, 62(3), 280-289.
  29. Kelly, I. (1987). Hong Kong: a political-geographic analysis. The Macmillan Press Ltd., Houndmills, Basingstoke.
  30. Kostromina, S., & Grishina, N. (2023). Psychology of Changeability: Basic Principles of Description of Processual Nature of Personality. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 57(2), 569-589.
  31. Langemeyer, I. (2023). Beyond the concept of “Gestalten”–Kurt Lewin and Lev Semënovic Vygotsky as methodologically related. Gestalt Theory, 45(3), 287-300.
  32. Lewin, K. (1936). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 84(5), 612-613.
  33. Lewin, K. (1937). Psychoanalysis and topological psychology. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 1(6), 202.
  34. Lewin, M. A. (1977). Kurt Lewin’s view of social psychology: The crisis of 1977 and the crisis of 1927. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(2), 159-172.
  35. Lewin, K. (1997). Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science. American Psychological Association.
  36. Lewin, K., & Blower, J. (2009). The landscape of war. Art in Translation, 1(2), 199-209.
  37. Martin, L.J. (2003). What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 1-49.
  38. Morehouse, B. (1995). A functional approach to boundaries in the context of environmental issues. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 10(2), 53-73.
  39. Oancea, M. (2024). AI and Deep Fake-Video and Audio Manipulation Techniques Capable of Altering the Political Process. Revista de Științe Politice / Revue des Sciences Politiques, (81), 70-82.
  40. Qi, Z. (2021). The Construction of a Learning Field Based on Lewin’s Equation for Behavior. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 9(6), 1-17.
  41. Rosch, E. (2002). Lewin’s field theory as situated action in organizational change. Organization Development Journal, 20(2), 8-14.
  42. Roşca, V. I. (2020). Kurt Lewin: His life and his approach to change management. Editura ASE, Bucharest.
  43. Roşca, V. I. (2020). Implications of Lewin’s field theory on social change. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence (Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 617-625).
  44. Skea, R. (2021). Leadership, Organizational Change and Sensemaking. Routledge.
  45. Szafraniec, K. (2017). The contemporary context of youth socialization: the specificity of post-communist countries. Polish Sociological Review, 198(2), 167-187.
  46. Teschendorf, B., & Nemshick, M. (2001). Faculty roles in professional socialization. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 15(1), 4-10.
  47. Weiss, P. (1992). Creative Ventures. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville.
  48. Wong, W. C. (2001). Co‐constructing the Personal Space‐ Time Totality: Listening to the Dialogue of Vygotsky, Lewin, Bronfenbrenner, and Stern. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31(4), 365-382.
Language: English
Page range: 1666 - 1675
Published on: Jul 24, 2025
Published by: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Vlad I. Roşca, Boris Dziura, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.