Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Features of an Internal Communication Platform for Corporate Employees. Meeting the Needs of Employees in a Hybrid Era

Open Access
|Jul 2024

References

  1. Babapour Chafi, M., Hultberg, A., & Bozic Yams, N. (2021). Post-pandemic office work: Perceived challenges and opportunities for a sustainable work environment. Sustainability, 14(1), 294.
  2. Chewning, L. V., Lai, C. H., & Doerfel, M. L. (2013). Organizational resilience and using information and communication technologies to rebuild communication structures. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(2), 237-263.
  3. Diener, E., Heintzelman, S. J., Kushlev, K., Tay, L., Wirtz, D., Lutes, L. D., & Oishi, S. (2017). Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian Psychology/psychologie canadienne, 58(2), p. 87.
  4. Dubey, A. D., & Tripathi, S. (2020). Analysing the sentiments towards work-from-home experience during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Innovation Management, 8(1), 13-19
  5. Ellis, R., Goodacre, T., Mortensen, N., Oeppen, R. S., & Brennan, P. A. (2022). Application of human factors at hybrid meetings: facilitating productivity and inclusivity. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 60(6), 740-745.
  6. Fayard, A. L., Weeks, J., & Khan, M. (2021). Designing the hybrid office. Harvard Business Review, 99(2), 114-123.
  7. Gabčanová, I. V. E. T. A. (2011). The employees–the most important asset in the organizations. Human Resources Management & Ergonomics, 5(1), 30-33.
  8. Gratton, L. (2021). How to do hybrid right. Harvard Business Review, 99(3), 66-74.
  9. Gupta, P., & Srivastava, R. K. (2011). Customer satisfaction for designing attractive qualities of healthcare service in India using Kano model and quality function deployment. MIT International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 1(2),p. 101-107.
  10. Halford, S. (2005). Hybrid workspace: Re- spatialisations of work, organisation, and management. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20(1), 19-33.
  11. Hon, A. H. (2012). When competency-based pay relates to creative performance: The moderating role of employee psychological need. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1), 130-138.
  12. Jiang, L., Clark, B. B., & Turban, D. B. (2023). Overcoming the challenge of exploration: How decompartmentalization of internal communication enhances the effect of exploration on employee inventive performance. Technovation, 119, 102611.
  13. Kensbock, J. M., Alkærsig, L., & Lomberg, C. (2022). The epidemic of mental disorders in business—How depression, anxiety, and stress spread across organizations through employee mobility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(1), 1-48.
  14. Lee, Y. (2023). ICT use, internal communication satisfaction, and engagement of working-from-home employees: The moderating role of affiliative tendency. Computers in human behavior, 138, 107472.
  15. Liu Y, Cherian, J., Ahmad, N., Han., H., de Vicente-Lama,M.,&Ariza-Montes, A. (2023). Internal corporate social responsibility and employee burnout: an employee management perspective from the healthcare sector. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 283-302.
  16. Moncarz, H. T., & Moncarz, H. T. (1997). Effective communication platforms. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  17. Morris, E. (2022). Hybrid Work Schedule and Employee Motivation (Doctoral dissertation, California State University, Northridge).
  18. Naqshbandi, M. M., Kabir, I., Ishak, N. A., & Islam, M. Z. (2023). The future of work: work engagement and job performance in the hybrid workplace. The Learning Organization.
  19. Nguyen My, L. (2017). The impact of employees motivation on organizational effectiveness.
  20. Prastitasari, D., Ekawati, A. D., Musofa, A., & Sudiarta, Y. (2023). What Influences the Comfort of Working from Home? A Lesson from the Covid-19 Pandemic. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 426, p. 02123). EDP Sciences.
  21. Sauerwein, E., Bailom, F., Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H. H. (1996, February). The Kano model: How to delight your customers. In International working seminar on production economics (Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 313-327).
  22. Sokolic, D. (2022). Remote work and hybrid work organizations. Economic and social development: Book of proceedings, 202-213.
  23. Torres, E. R., Cano, C. A. G., & Castillo, V. S. (2024). Application of gamification in work environment. Gamification and Augmented Reality, 2, 24-24.
  24. Weritz, P., Matute, J., Braojos, J., & Kane, J. (2022). How Much Digital is Too Much? A Study on Employees’ Hybrid Workplace Preferences.
  25. Witell, L., Löfgren, M., & Dahlgaard, J. J. (2013). Theory of attractive quality and the Kano methodology–the past, the present, and the future. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(11-12), 1241-1252.
  26. Zaumane, I., & Leščevica, M. (2023). Functional responsibility for internal communication management and its integration in contemporary businesses. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(5), 1492-1512.
  27. Zuckerman, M., Porac, J., Lathin, D., & Deci, E. L. (1978). On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically-motivated behavior. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 4(3), 443-446.
Language: English
Page range: 2997 - 3006
Published on: Jul 3, 2024
Published by: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Rebecca Chincea, Sabina Potra, Matei Tamasila, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.