Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Political Regime and Governance on climate Change. Evidence from the Western Balkan Economies

Open Access
|Jul 2024

References

  1. Alfthan, B., Krilasevic, E., Venturini, S., Bajrovic, S., Jurek, M., Schoolmeester, T., Sandei, P. C., Egerer, H., & Kurvits, T. (2015). Mountain Adaptation Outlook Series: Outlook on Climate Change Adaptation in the Western Balkan Mountains (United Nat). GRID-Arendal and Environmental Innovations Association. https://www.grida.no/publications/162
  2. Alola, A. A., & Ozturk, I. (2021). Mirroring risk to investment within the EKC hypothesis in the United States. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112890
  3. Banja, M., Đukanović, G., & Belis, C. A. (2020). Status of air pollutants and greenhouse gases in the Western Balkans -Benchmarking the accession process progress on environment. https://doi.org/10.2760/48321
  4. Bättig, M. B., & Bernauer, T. (2009). National institutions and global public goods: Are democracies more cooperative in climate change policy? International Organization, 63(2), 281–308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090092
  5. Beeson, M. (2016). Environmental Authoritarianism and China. In T. Gabrielson, C. Hall, J. M. Meyer, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory (Issue November 2018, pp. 1–15). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199685271.013.14
  6. Berishaj, V. (2021). Western Balkans Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Targets 2030. The Path to achieving climate neutrality by 2050. https://caneurope.org/can-europe-calls-western-balkan-leaders-to-set-ambitious-2030-targets-now-and-decarbonise-by-2050/
  7. Bernauer, T., & Koubi, V. (2009). Effects of political institutions on air quality. Ecological Economics, 68(5), 1355–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.003
  8. Beşe, E., & Kalayci, S. (2021). Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC): Empirical relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Evidence from 3 Developed Countries. Panoeconomicus, 68(4), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN180503004B
  9. Bieber, F. (2018). Patterns of competitive authoritarianism in the Western Balkans. East European Politics, 34(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1490272
  10. Bilgili, F., Koçak, E., & Bulut, Ü. (2016). The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 838–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080
  11. Boese, V. A., & Eberhardt, M. (2022). Which Institutions Rule? Unbundling the Democracy-Growth Nexus. In Working Paper (131; Varieties of Democracy Institute: Working Paper, Issue 131). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4032511
  12. Breitung, J. (2000). The Local Power Of Some Unit Root Test For Panel Data. In R. Baltagi, B.H., Fomby, T.B. and Carter Hill (Ed.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels (Advances in Econometrics, Vol.15) (Vol. 15, pp. 161–179). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6
  13. Breitung, J., & Das, S. (2005). Panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence. Statistica Neerlandica, 59(4), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2005.00299.x
  14. Carragher, A. (2021). The EU’s Green Agenda for the Western Balkans Packs a Risky Geopolitical Agenda. Carnegie Europe. https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/84879
  15. Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6
  16. Clulow, Z. (2019). Democracy, electoral systems and emissions: explaining when and why democratization promotes mitigation. Climate Policy, 19(2), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1497938
  17. Congleton, R. D. (1992). Political institutions and pollution control. Review of Economics & Statistics, 74(3), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109485
  18. Eren, M. (2022). Different impacts of democracy and income on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from a panel quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(47), 71439–71459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20805-x
  19. Fredriksson, P. G., & Neumayer, E. (2013). Democracy and climate change policies: Is history important? Ecological Economics, 95, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.08.002
  20. Fredriksson, P. G., & Wollscheid, J. R. (2014). Political Institutions, Political Careers and Environmental Policy. Kyklos, 67(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12043
  21. Freedom House. (2019). Freedom in the World 2019: Democracy in Retreat. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/Feb2019_FH_FITW_2019_Report_ForWeb-compressed.pdf
  22. Gilley, B. (2012). Authoritarian environmentalism and China’s response to climate change. Environmental Politics, 21(2), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.651904
  23. Global Carbon Budget. (2023). Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data. “Annual CO2 emissions (per capita) – GCB” [dataset]. Global Carbon Project, “Global Carbon Budget”; Various sources, “Population” [original data]. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions
  24. Grimm, S., & Mathis, O. Lou. (2015). Stability First, Development Second, Democracy Third: The European Union’s Policy towards the Post-Conflict Western Balkans, 1991–2010. Europe - Asia Studies, 67(6), 916–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2015.1055237
  25. Hannesson, R. (2022). Is There a Kuznets Curve for CO2-Emissions? Biophysical Economics and Sustainability, 7(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-022-00099-w
  26. Harris, R. D. F., & Tzavalis, E. (1999). Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed. Journal of Econometrics, 91(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00076-1
  27. Htike, M. M., Shrestha, A., & Kakinaka, M. (2022). Investigating whether the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis holds for sectoral CO2 emissions: evidence from developed and developing countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(11), 12712–12739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01961-5
  28. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
  29. Jahanger, A., Usman, M., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2021). Autocracy, democracy, globalization, and environmental pollution in developing world: Fresh evidence from STIRPAT model. Journal of Public Affairs, August. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2753
  30. Kacprzyk, A., & Kuchta, Z. (2020). Shining a new light on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions. Energy Economics, 87, 104704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104704
  31. Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2023). Worldwide Governance Indicators. The World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators
  32. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(02), 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046
  33. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido, P. (1999). Aggregating Governance Indicators. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2195. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.188548
  34. Kim, S., Baek, J., & Heo, E. (2019). A new look at the democracy-environment nexus: Evidence from panel data for high- and low-income countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(8), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082353
  35. Kneuer, M. (2012). Who is greener? Climate action and political regimes: Trade-offs for national and international actors. Democratization, 19(5), 865–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.709686
  36. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811581
  37. Lægreid, O. M., & Povitkina, M. (2018). Do Political Institutions Moderate the GDP-CO2 Relationship? Ecological Economics, 145(November 2017), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.014
  38. Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
  39. Lindvall, D. (2021). Democracy and the Challenge of Climate Change. In International IDEA Discussion Paper (3; International IDEA Discussion Paper). https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2021.88
  40. Lührmann, A., Maerz, S. F., Grahn, S., Alizada, N., Gastaldi, L., Hellmeier, S., Hindle, G., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020). Autocratzation Surges - Resistance Grows. Democracy Report 2020. https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/f0/5d/f05d46d8-626f-4b20-8e4e-53d4b134bfcb/democracy_report_2020_low.pdf
  41. Lv, Z. (2017). The effect of democracy on CO2 emissions in emerging countries: Does the level of income matter? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72(February 2016), 900–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.096
  42. Mitić, P., Fedajev, A., & Kojić, M. (2023). Exploring the Economy – Environment Interactions in the Western Balkans. Economic Analysis, 56(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.28934/ea.23.56.1.pp43-56
  43. Morgan, R., Beger, A., & Glynn, A. (2019). Varieties of Forecasts: Predicting Adverse Regime Transitions. In V-Dem (89; Issue 89). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3389194
  44. Muhammad, S., & Long, X. (2021). Rule of law and CO2 emissions: A comparative analysis across 65 belt and road initiative(BRI) countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123539
  45. Pata, U. K. (2018). Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.236
  46. Pavlović, D. (2019). When do neoliberal economic reforms cause democratic decline? Evidence from the post-communist Southeast Europe. Post-Communist Economies, 00(00), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2019.1607436
  47. Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel Conintegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Thoery, 20(3), 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073
  48. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156
  49. Povitkina, M. (2018). The limits of democracy in tackling climate change. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1444723
  50. Ridzuan, A. R., Kumaran, V. V., Fianto, B. A., Shaari, M. S., Esquivias, M. A., & Albani, A. (2022). Reinvestigating the Presence of Environmental Kuznets Curve in Malaysia: The Role of Foreign Direct Investment. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(5), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.13461
  51. Sanchez-Nicolas, E. (2021). Western Balkan coal plants causing thousands of deaths. Euobserver. https://euobserver.com/climate/152842
  52. Shahbaz, M., & Sinha, A. (2019). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(1), 106–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-09-2017-0249
  53. Sinha, A., Sedai, A. K., Kumar, A., & Nepal, R. (2021). Are autocracies bad for the environment? Global evidence from two centuries of data. In CAMA Working Paper (24/2021; CAMA Working Paper). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3791763
  54. The World Bank. (2023). World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files [GDP per capita (current US$)]. The World Bank Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD
  55. V-Dem data. (2023). V-Dem [Country-Year/Country-Date] Dataset v12. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds22.
  56. Von Stein, J. (2022). Democracy, Autocracy, and Everything in Between: How Domestic Institutions Affect Environmental Protection. British Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712342000054X
  57. Vuković, A., & Mandić, M. V. (2018). Study on climate change in the Western Balkans region (SEE2020 Series). ttps://www.rcc.int/download/pubs/2018-05-Study-on-Climate-Change-in-WB-2a-lowres.pdf/06af8f7432484a6ce384ebcb8c05e8d7.pdf
  58. Westerlund, J. (2005). New Simple Tests for Panel Cointegration. Econometric Reviews, 24(3), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930500243019
  59. WGI. (2019). WGI 2018. The World Bank Group. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home
  60. World Bank. (2022). Western Balkans Regular Economic Report. Beyond the Crises (Issue 22). http://hdl.handle.net/10986/38189
  61. World Bank. (2023). Western Balkans Regular Economic Report. Toward Sustainable Growth (Issue 24). http://hdl.handle.net/10986/40496
  62. You, W., Li, Y., Guo, P., & Guo, Y. (2020). Income inequality and CO2 emissions in belt and road initiative countries: the role of democracy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(6), 6278–6299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07242-z
  63. Zhang, J. (2021). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis on CO2 Emissions: Evidence for China. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14030093
Language: English
Page range: 1261 - 1276
Published on: Jul 3, 2024
Published by: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Eirini Triarchi, Dimitrios Kolias, Kostas Karamanis, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.