Innovation at the Board Level: Bibliometric Analysis over Three Decades
By:
References
- Aghimien, D., Aigbavboa, C., Oke, A., Thwala, W. & Moripe, P. (2022). Digitalization of construction organisations – a case for digital partnering. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(10), 1950-1959.
- Bacon, E., Williams, M.D., Davies, G., (2020). Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations. Journal of Business Research, 115, 307-316.
- Banholzer, M., Birshan, M., Doherty, R., and LaBerge, L. (2023). Mckinsey Innovation: Your solution for weathering uncertainty. Mckinsey. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/innovation-your-solution-for-weathering-uncertainty
- Belloc, F. (2012). Corporate governance and innovation: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(5), 835-864.
- Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., Lim, W.M. (2021a). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
- EY. (2024). Americas board priorities 2024, https://www.ey.com/en_us/board-matters/americas-board-priorities-2024
- Fauzi, M.A. (2022). Knowledge hiding behavior in higher education institutions: a scientometric analysis and systematic literature review approach. Journal of Knowledge Management, January.
- Griffin, D., Li, K., Xu, T. (2021). Board gender diversity and corporate innovation: International evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56 (1), 123-154.
- Kaur, V. (2019). Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities: The road ahead in gaining organisational competitiveness. Springer International Publishing.
- KPMG. (2023). CEO Outlook. https://kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2023/09/kpmg-global-ceo-outlook-survey.html#disruptivetechnology
- Kuzey, C., Fritz, M.M.C., Uyar, A., Karaman, A.S. (2022). Board gender diversity, CSR strategy, and eco-friendly initiatives in the transportation and logistics sector. International Journal of Production Economics, 247.
- Maier, D., Maier, A., Așchilean, I., Anastasiu, L., Gavriș, O. (2020). The Relationship between Innovation and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 12(10):4083.
- Nuveen. (2023). Aligning advocacy with actions Annual Stewardship Report 2022–2023. https://documents.nuveen.com/Documents/Nuveen/Viewer.aspx?uniqueid=3b093405-a8b6-40fc-b6e5-07aa4a41a427
- Orazalin, N., Mahmood, M. (2021). Toward sustainable development: Board characteristics, country governance quality, and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30 (8), 3569-3588.
- Parrilli, M.D., Radicic, D. (2020). STI and DUI innovation modes in micro-, small-, medium- and large-sized firms: distinctive patterns across Europe and the U.S.. European Planning Studies, 29 (2), 346-368.
- Păunescu, C., Argatu, R. (2020). Critical functions in ensuring effective business continuity management. Evidence from Romanian companies. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(2), 497-520.
- Păunescu, C., Matyus, E. (2020). Resilience measures to dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence from Romanian micro and small enterprises. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 15, 439-457.
- Qiu, L., Yu, R., Hu, F., Zhou, H., Hu, H. (2023). How can China's medical manufacturing listed firms improve their technological innovation efficiency? An analysis based on a three-stage DEA model and corporate governance configurations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194.
- Rebeiz, K.S., (2018). Relationship between boardroom independence and corporate performance: Reflections and perspectives. European Management Journal, 36 (1), 83-90.
- Robertson, J., Caruana, A., Ferreira, C. (2023). Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems, International Business Review, 32(2), 101866.
- Romanelli, P., Gonçalves, M.C.P., de Abreu Pestana, L.F. et al. (2021). Four challenges when conducting bibliometric reviews and how to deal with them. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 28, 60448–60458.
- Saleh, R.H., Durugbo, C.M. & Almahamid, S.M. (2023). What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 3013–3056
- Scherer, A.G., Voegtlin, C. (2020). Corporate governance for responsible innovation: Approaches to corporate governance and their implications for sustainable development. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34 (2), 182-208.
- Shafeeq Nimr Al-Maliki, H., Salehi, M., Kardan, B. (2023). The relationship between board characteristics and social responsibility with firm innovation. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 32(1), 113-129.
- Singh, A., Lim, W.M., Jha, S., Kumar, S., Ciasullo, M.V. (2023). The state of the art of strategic leadership, Journal of Business Research, 158 (C).
- Valero-Gil, J., Surroca, J. A., Tribo, J. A., Gutierrez, L., Montiel, I., (2023). Innovation vs. standardization: The conjoint effects of eco-innovation and environmental management systems on environmental performance. Research Policy, 52(4), 104737.
- Van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111 (2), 1053-1070.
- Waltman, L., Van Eck, N.J, Noyons, E.C.M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4 (4), 629–635.
- Xue, Y., Jiang, C., Guo, Y., Liu, J., Wu H., Hao Y. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility and High-quality Development: Do Green Innovation, Environmental Investment and Corporate Governance Matter?. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(11), 3191-3214.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2024-0090 | Journal eISSN: 2558-9652
Language: English
Page range: 1029 - 1044
Published on: Jul 3, 2024
Published by: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Related subjects:
© 2024 Gina Matei, Nicolae-Marius Vavura, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.