Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Role of an Integrated Quality Management System in Improving Performance in the Port Organization Cover

The Role of an Integrated Quality Management System in Improving Performance in the Port Organization

Open Access
|Jul 2023

References

  1. Akgul, B., (2017). Green Port / Eco Port Project - Applications and Procedures in Turkey. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 95 042063.
  2. Arvis, J.F., Vesin, V., Carruthers, R. and Ducruet, C. (2019). Maritime Networks, Port Efficiency, and Hinterland Connectivity in the Mediterranean. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
  3. Brătianu, C. (2015). Managementul cunoștințelor. Concepte fundamentale. București: Editura Universitară.
  4. Brooks M.R. and Pallis A.A. (2008). Assessing port governance models: Process and performance components. Maritime Policy and Management, 35(4), 411-432.
  5. European Commission. (n.d.). Safety and Environment. Retrieved from https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-modes/maritime/safety-and-environment_en.
  6. Hatami-Marbini, A., Saati, S., Tavana, M. (2010) An ideal-seeking fuzzy data envelopment analysis framework. Appl. Soft Comput., 10, 1062–1070.
  7. Lorencic, V., Twrdy, E., Lep, M. (2022). Cruise Port Performance Evaluation in the Context of Port Authority: An MCDA Approach. Sustainability, 14, 4181. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074181">https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074181.
  8. Melalla, O., Vyshka, E. & Lumi, D. (2016). Defining the most important port performance indicators: a case of albanian ports. Int. J. Econ., Commer. Manag. U K 3(10):808–819. Retrieved from http://ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/31049.pdf.
  9. Nicolae, F., Bucur, M., Cotorcea, A. (2018). Port performance evaluation. Case study: Ports in the Black Sea basin. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 172 012004
  10. Oprean, C., & Țîțu, M. (2008). Managementul calității în economia și organizația bazate pe cunoștințe. București: A.G.I.R.
  11. Quintano, C., Mazzocchi, P. & Rocca, A. (2020). A competitive analysis of EU ports by fixing spatial and economic dimensions. Journal of Shipping and Trade. Retrieved from https://jshippingandtrade.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41072-020-00075-x.
  12. Sav, G. T. (2013). Four-Stage DEA Efficiency Evaluations: Financial Reforms in Public University Funding. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5 (1), 24-33.
  13. Shetty, D.K., Dwarakish, G. (2018). Measuring port performance and productivity. ISH J Hydraul Eng 26(2):221–227.
  14. Touzinsky, K.F., Scully, B.M., Mitchell, K.N. & Kress, M.M. (2018) Using Empirical Data to Quantify Port Resilience: Hurricane Matthew and the Southeastern Seaboard, Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, Vol 144, No. 4.
  15. Vaggelas G.K. & Pallis A.A., (2018). Lessons learned from measuring shipping companies and other port users’ perceptions of port performance. International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) Conference 2018, Mombasa, Kenya.
  16. Wankhede, A. (2021). The ISPS Code for Ships – An Essential Quick Guide. Marine Insight. Retrieved from https://www.marineinsight.com/maritime-law/the-isps-code-for-ships-a-quick-guide/.
Language: English
Page range: 1286 - 1296
Published on: Jul 14, 2023
Published by: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2023 Andreea Maria Ungureanu, Cristian Vasile Doicin, Costel Stanca, Aurel Mihail Titu, published by The Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.