Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Determinants of Audit Quality and Connections with Economic Development and Education Cover

Determinants of Audit Quality and Connections with Economic Development and Education

Open Access
|Jul 2023

References

  1. Al-Qatamin, K. I., & Salleh, Z. (2020). Audit quality: A Literature overview and research synthesis. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 22(2), 56-66.
  2. Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary accounting research, 15(1), 1-24.
  3. Borisova, T. G., & Bekhteneva, R. A. (2015). Certified Public Accountant is unmatched advantage on the global job market. European Journal of Economic Studies, 5(2), 64-68.
  4. Bowlin, K. O., Hobson, J. L., & Piercey, M. D. (2015). The effects of auditor rotation, professional skepticism, and interactions with managers on audit quality. The Accounting Review, 90(4), 1363-1393.
  5. Brandon-Vagner C. P. A. (2018). Why the problem of premature sign-offs exists in auditing: a theoretical inquiry. The Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 14(1), 1-18.
  6. Caraiani, P., Dutescu, A., Hoinaru, R., & Stănilă, G. O. (2020). Production network structure and the impact of the monetary policy shocks: Evidence from the OECD. Economics Letters, 193(C).
  7. Cho, M., Kwon, S. Y., & Krishnan, G. V. (2021). Audit fee lowballing: Determinants, recovery, and future audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(4), 106787.
  8. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor independence, “low balling” and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 113-127.
  9. El Badlaoui, A., Cherqaoui, M., & Taouab, O. (2021). Output indicators of audit quality: A framework based on literature review. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(6), 1405-1421.
  10. Ferreira, L., & Hitchcock, D. B. (2009). A comparison of hierarchical methods for clustering functional data. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 38(9), 1925-1949.
  11. Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. D. (2009). Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521-1552.
  12. Guiral, A., Rodgers, W., Ruiz, E., & Gonzalo-Angulo, J. A. (2015). Can expertise mitigate auditors’ unintentional biases?. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 24(1), 105-117.
  13. Gundry, L. C., & Liyanarachchi, G. A. (2007). Time budget pressure, auditors’ personality type, and the incidence of reduced audit quality practices. Pacific Accounting Review, 19(2), 125-152.
  14. Haslam, C., Tsitsianis, N., Hoinaru, R., Andersson, T. & Katechos, G. (2016). Stress Testing International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Accounting for Stability and the Public Good in a Financialized World. Accounting, Economics and Law: A Convivium, 6(2), 93-118.
  15. Hoinaru, R. (2017). Follow the money. The impact of the illicit financial flows home and abroad. A common European-African perspective. Romanian Journal of Economics, 44(1), 53.
  16. Hoinaru, R., (2023). Financial reporting in Europe: Accounting for regulatory and technical challenges.
  17. Hurtt, K., Eining, M.M, & Plumlee, D. (2008). An Experimental Examination of Professional Skepticism. Working paper, Baylor University and The University of Utah.
  18. Irvine, J. (2016). Big six firms found wanting over audit quality. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Available at: https://economia.icaew.com/news/march-2016/bigsix-firms-found-wanting-over-audit-quality (accessed in 20.09.2022).
  19. Johnson, C.J. (2016). Organizational ethics: A practical approach. California: SAGE.
  20. Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L. B., & Velury, U. K. (2013). Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A journal of practice & theory, 32(Supplement 1), 385-421.
  21. Lambert, T. A., & Agoglia, C. P. (2011). Closing the loop: Review process factors affecting audit staff follow‐through. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(5), 1275-1306.
  22. Oprea, O., Hoinaru, R., Păcuraru-Ionescu, C. P., & Neamţu, D. (2022). Accounting for the future: practice, Artificial Intelligence and regulation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence (Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 817-826).
  23. Peecher, M. E., & Piercey, M. D. (2008). Judging audit quality in light of adverse outcomes: Evidence of outcome bias and reverse outcome bias. Contemporary accounting research, 25(1), 243-274.
  24. WEF (2020). The global Competitiveness Index 4.0. World Economic Forum. Available online at: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2020. Accessed in 11.11.2022.
  25. World Bank (2023). Indicator: Economy and Growth. World Bank Data. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/topic/economy-and-growth. Accessed in 03.03.2023.
Language: English
Page range: 741 - 751
Published on: Jul 14, 2023
Published by: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2023 Cătălin-Paul Păcuraru-Ionescu, Marius Cîmpan, Sorin Nicolae Borlea, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.