The Interplay Between Risk Framing, Attitude toward Policy, Negative Affect and Hard Policy Support
By:
References
- Akdemir, K. H. (2021). How do the main negative emotions affect people’s political decision process? : “Fear, anxiety and anger. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi (AID), 16(1).
- Attari, S. Z., Krantz, D. H., & Weber, E. U. (2019). Climate change communicators’ carbon footprints affect their audience’s policy support. Climatic Change, 154(3-4), 529–545.
- Attari, S. Z., Schoen, M., Davidson, C. I., DeKay, M. L., Bruine de Bruin, W., Dawes, R., & Small, M. J. (2009). Preferences for change: Do individuals prefer voluntary actions, soft regulations, or hard regulations to decrease fossil fuel consumption? Ecological Economics, 68(6), 1701–1710.
- Brosch, T. (2021). Affect and emotions as drivers of climate change perception and action: a review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 15-21.
- Buergin, R. (2022, August 13). Germany proposes cooler office temperatures to save gas. Bloomberg.com. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-13/germanyproposes-cooler-office-temperatures-to-conserve-gas
- Dietz, T., Dan, A., & Shwom, R. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences*. Rural Sociology, 72(2), 185–214.
- Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2015). What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate Policy, 16(7), 855–876.
- Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., & Lupia, A. (2006). The growth and development of experimental research in political science. American Political Science Review, 100(04), 627.
- EEA. (2021). EU achieves 20-20-20 climate targets, 55 % emissions cut by 2030 reachable with more efforts and policies. European Environment Agency. https://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/eu-achieves-20-20-20
- Gençöz, T. (2000). Pozitif ve negatif duygu ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15(46), 19–26.
- Gordon, C., & Arian, A. (2001). Threat and Decision Making. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(2), 196–215.
- Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 622–626.
- Infratest dimap. (2022). Weiterhin unterstützung für sanktionen gegen russland – trotz möglicher nachteile für Deutschland. Www.infratest-Dimap.de. https://www.infratest-dimap.de/umfragen-analysen/bundesweit/umfragen/aktuell/weiterhin-unterstuetzung-fuersanktionen-gegen-russland-trotz-moeglicher-nachteile-fuer-deutschland/
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350.
- Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1(1), 11–27.
- Lau, R. R. (2003). Models of decision making. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political psychology. (pp. 19–59). Oxford University Press.
- Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1-2), 45–72.
- Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286.
- Maes, J., Egoh, B., Willemen, L., Liquete, C., Vihervaara, P., Schägner, J. P., Grizzetti, B., Drakou, E. G., Notte, A. L., Zulian, G., Bouraoui, F., Luisa Paracchini, M., Braat, L., & Bidoglio, G. (2012). Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 31–39.
- Noll, B., Filatova, T., Need, A., & de Vries, P. (2023). Uncertainty in individual risk judgments is associated with vulnerability and curtailed climate adaptation. Journal of Environmental Management, 325, 116462.
- Nunnally, J. Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
- O’Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J., Yarnal, B., & Wiefek, N. (2002). Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 1–17.
- Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. The Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 93–114.
- Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322.
- Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). The rise of global warming skepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 1021–1032.
- Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2013). The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Analysis, 34(5), 937–948.
- Statista. (2022). Natural gas import share by country Germany 2020. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1331539/natural-gas-import-share-by-countrygermany/
- Stedman, R. C. (2004). Risk and climate change: Perceptions of key policy actors in canada. Risk Analysis, 24(5), 1395–1406.
- UNSMS Security Policy Manual. (2017). Section A: Security Risk Management. https://policy.un.org/sites/policy.un.org/files/files/documents/2020/Oct/spm_-_chapter_iv_-_section_a_-_security_risk_management_2.pdf
- Vainio, A., & Paloniemi, R. (2011). Does belief matter in climate change action? Public Understanding of Science, 22(4), 382–395.
- van Gelder, J.-L., de Vries, R. E., & van der Pligt, J. (2009). Evaluating a dual-process model of risk: Affect and cognition as determinants of risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22(1), 45–61.
- Wang, S., Leviston, Z., Hurlstone, M., Lawrence, C., & Walker, I. (2018). Emotions predict policy support: Why it matters how people feel about climate change. Global Environmental Change, 50, 25-40.
- Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.
- Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Grover, H., & Vedlitz, A. (2006). Climate Change Vulnerability and Policy Support. Society & Natural Resources, 19(9), 771–789.
- Silva, A. S., Campos-Silva, W. L., Gouvea, M. A., & Farina, M. C. (2019). Vignettes: A data collection technique to handle the differential operation of items in surveys. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 16, 16-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2558-9652
Language: English
Page range: 122 - 128
Published on: Jul 14, 2023
Published by: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2023 Berker Özcureci, Tuğba Tuğrul, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.