Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The Need of Venture Capital Investors in Life Sciences Clusters: a Comparison between Romania and Germany

Open Access
|Aug 2022

References

  1. Alberti, F. G., & Pizzurno, E. (2015). Knowledge exchanges in innovation networks: Evidence from an Italian aerospace cluster. Competitiveness review.10.1108/CR-01-2015-0004
  2. Allesch, J. (1993). The Role of Supporting Industries. In Abell, D. F., & Köllermeier, T. (Eds.). (1993). Dynamic Entrepreneurship in Central and Eastern Europe. Delwel Publishers.
  3. Bender, M. (2011). Spatial proximity in venture capital financing: A theoretical and empirical analysis of Germany. Springer Science & Business Media.
  4. Birch, K. (2017). Innovation, Regional Development, and the Life Sciences (I ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis Group
  5. Burger, M. J., Karreman, B., & van Eenennaam, F. (2015). The Competitive Advantage of Clusters Cluster organizations and greenfield FDI in the European life sciences industry. Geoforum, 65, 179-19110.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.019
  6. Carden, C., Chamberlain, T. & Hill, J. (2010). The brave new world of valuing life sciences and healthcare enterprises. Business Horizons, 53(2), 183-197.10.1016/j.bushor.2009.11.004
  7. Carrick, J. (2016). R&D resources development in life sciences ventures: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development10.1108/JSBED-04-2016-0054
  8. Caselli, S., & Negri, G. (2021). Private equity and venture capital in Europe: markets, techniques, and deals. Academic Press.
  9. Caselli, S., Gatti, S., & Perrini, F. (2009). Are venture capitalists a catalyst for innovation? European Financial Management, 15(1), 92-111.10.1111/j.1468-036X.2008.00445.x
  10. Cojanu, V., Petre, A. & Porumboiu, C. (2021). Emergence of Romanian Life Sciences Clusters in the Context of the New EU Industrial Strategy. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 21(1).
  11. Decarolis, D. M. & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The Impact of Stocks and Flows of Organizational Knowledge on Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation of The Biotechnology Industry. Strategic Management Journal (20), 953-968.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199910)20:10<;953::AID-SMJ59>3.0.CO;2-3
  12. Dessi, R., & Yin, N. (2012). The Impact of Venture Capital on innovation. Oxford Handbook of Venture Capital.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195391596.013.0023
  13. Dohse, D. (1998). The BioRegio-contest: a new approach to technology policy and its regional consequences. Kiel Working Paper (880)
  14. DTI&ECOTEC. (2004). A Practical Guide to Cluster Development. Department of Trade and Industry and ECOTEC Research&Consulting.
  15. Engel, D., & Keilbach, M. (2007). Firm-level implications of early-stage venture capital investment: An empirical investigation. Journal of Empirical Finance, 14(2), 150–167.10.1016/j.jempfin.2006.03.004
  16. Enriquez, J., & Goldberg, R. A. (2000). Transforming Life, Transforming Business: The Life- Science Revolution. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 96-96.
  17. Faria, A. P., & Barbosa, N. (2014). Does venture capital really foster innovation?. Economics Letters, 122(2), 129-131.10.1016/j.econlet.2013.11.014
  18. Fier, A., & Heneric, O. (2005). Public R&D Policy: The Right Turns of the Wrong. ZEW Discussion Papers (5-6).
  19. Harm, C. (1992). The financing of small firms in Germany (Vol. 899). World Bank Publications.
  20. Hellmann, T., & Puri, M. (2000). The interaction between product market and financing strategy: The role of venture capital. The review of financial studies, 13(4), 959–984.10.1093/rfs/13.4.959
  21. Jacobs, D., & Man, A.-P. D. (1996). Clusters, industrial policy and firm strategy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8(4), 425-438.10.1080/09537329608522461
  22. Jong, S. (2006). How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(2), 251-28310.1093/icc/dtj014
  23. Ketels, C. H., & Memedovic, O. (2008). From clusters to cluster-based economic development. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1(3), 375-392.10.1504/IJTLID.2008.019979
  24. Kiese, M. (2013). Regional Cluster Policies in Germany: A Multi-Level Governance Perspective on Policy Learning. European Review of Industrial Economics and Politics (5).
  25. Knop, L., Olko, S., & Stachowicz, J. (2011). Crises in the cluster life-cycle. In Management Knowledge and Learning-International Conference. V. Dermol, N. Trunk Širca, G. Dakovic, & U. Lindav, U. (Eds.). Celje, Econpapers (pp. 355-364).
  26. Kollermeier, T. (1993). The Eastern German Transition. In Abell, D. F., & Köllermeier, T. (Eds.). (1993). Dynamic Entrepreneurship in Central and Eastern Europe. Delwel Publishers.
  27. Kortum, S., Lerner, J. (2000). Assessing the contribution of venture capital. Journal of Economics, 31(4), 674-692.
  28. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics (1st ed.). London: Macmillan.
  29. Menzel, M.P. and Fornahl, D. (2007). Cluster life cycles: Dimensions and rationales of cluster development. Jena Economic Research Papers, 1-45.10.2139/ssrn.1025970
  30. Popov, A. & Roosenboom, P. (2009). Does private equity investment spur innovation? Evidence from Europe. sl: European Central Bank.
  31. Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and Competition, New Agendas for Companies, Governments, and Institutions. In M. Porter, E., On Competition. Harvard Business School Press.
  32. Storper, M. (1992). The Limits to Globalization: Technology Districts and International Trade. Economic geography, 68(1), 60-93.10.2307/144041
  33. Vicente, J. (2018). Economics of clusters: A brief history of cluster theory and policy. Springer.
  34. St. John, Caron, H., and Pouder, R.W. (2006). Technology clusters versus industry clusters: Resources, networks and regional advantages. Growth and Change, 37(2), 141-17110.1111/j.1468-2257.2006.00313.x
  35. Watt, A. (2008). The Impact of Private Equity on European Companies and workers: key issues and a Review of the evidence. Industrial Relations Journal, 39(6), 548-568.10.1111/j.1468-2338.2008.00505.x
  36. Romanian Government (2018). Document of industrial policy of Romania
  37. Romanian Government (1997). Green Cart. Regional development policy of Romania
  38. BVK (2021). The German Private Equity Market in 2020, https://www.bvkap.de/sites/default/iles/page/presentation_bvk_annual_statistics_2020.pdf
  39. European Investment Bank (2018). Financing the next wave of medical breakthroughts - What works and what needs fixing? Access-to-Finance Conditions for Life Sciences R&D. Retrieved from https://www.eib.org/attachments/pj/access_to_finance_conditions_for_life_sciences_r_d_en.pdf
  40. Invest Europe (2021). 2020 Central and Eastern Europe Private Equity Statistics, Retrieved from https://www.investeurope.eu/media/3983/invest-europe-cee-activity-report-2020.pdf
  41. KPMG. (2018). Site Selection for Life Sciences Companies in Europe. Retrieved from https://home.kpmg/be/en/home/insights/2019/05/site-selection-for-life-sciencescompanies.html
  42. The German biotechology industry (2020). Retreived from https://biotechnologie.de/statistics_articles/30-die-deutsche-biotechnologie-branche-2020
  43. World Health Organization (2005). Life Sciences Research: Opportunities and Risks for public health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/ethics/Life%20Science%20Research.pdf
Language: English
Page range: 1038 - 1046
Published on: Aug 8, 2022
Published by: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Cristina Porumboiu, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.